whitehall
Diamond Member
Half of the CNN former upper echelon is in jail or pending indictment or law suits, so the best news for the left is a lame law suit against Fox's Tucker. boo hoo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They also forget the recent ruling that saved the NY Slimes from Palin. That ruling was that they did in fact lie and slander her, but they called it an opinion. Same thing will apply here. Or else CNN, MSNBC, the Slimes, the Washington Compost, and every other leftist outlet would have to pay for their pushing of the debunked Russia Collusion hoax. Another nothing burger.So, this time the cancel culture is contending that Tucker Carlson should be taken seriously. ??
Also, wouldn’t it be a benefit to FOX News that one of its on-air staff HAD broadcast concerns about what Powell had claimed. You see, you jokers can’t have it both ways. If Fox News had acted with “malice,” you wouldn’t have heard ON Fox News such expressions of doubt about Ms. Powell’s claims and the absence of verification.
That's a shameless lie.That ruling was that they did in fact lie and slander her, but they called it an opinion.
Think you need to grow a brain. Was shown that Trump Jr. threw that Russian OBAMA PLANT out when he saw what was going on. She then ran right to Obozo. Plotting to does not equal did. Stay in the shallow end, you can’t handle the deep end yet. Maybe try to actually tell the truth. Oh, you don’t do that. You also don’t provide proof of any of your bullshit lies. See “justified lynchings”.Ummm?
The "whole thing"?
What about the meeting with Fredo Trump, Paul Monafort, et al, with that Russian attorney in Trump's own building? The meeting where they went to get dirt on Hilary......and when the meeting got reported in the press, they then claimed ..'Oh no, it was about adoptions of orphans'.
The same meeting that Steve Bannon called 'treasonous'?
"Steve Bannon, the former White House chief strategist, calls a meeting of Trump campaign officials with a Russian lawyer in Trump Tower during the presidential campaign "treasonous" and "unpatriotic."
Now, the good poster Justice Hammer, says that meeting and Bannon's comments were fake?
What about those 13 Russians?
Were they fake too?
"WASHINGTON (CBSNewYork/AP) -- Thirteen Russians and three Russian entities were charged Friday with an elaborate plot to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, federal prosecutors announced Friday.
---------------------------------------------------------
Methinks the poster Justice need do a little more due diligence.
This is, after all, Adult Swim.
One is expected to at least hold his own head above water.
Cry harder bitch. That was indeed the ruling. Run away like usual now retard.That's a shameless lie.
You cult pukes don't even remember how NOT to lie.
Not a chance! This is the Republican propaganda channel, and they will continue to spread their lies as long as they have a breath left.Its likely to cost them. And looking forward I would expect that the insurers will have a huge influence on the stations output. Maybe the crazy will be dialled down.
Go Trump, Biden sucks, and you're an idiot.Ummm?
The "whole thing"?
What about the meeting with Fredo Trump, Paul Monafort, et al, with that Russian attorney in Trump's own building? The meeting where they went to get dirt on Hilary......and when the meeting got reported in the press, they then claimed ..'Oh no, it was about adoptions of orphans'.
The same meeting that Steve Bannon called 'treasonous'?
"Steve Bannon, the former White House chief strategist, calls a meeting of Trump campaign officials with a Russian lawyer in Trump Tower during the presidential campaign "treasonous" and "unpatriotic."
Now, the good poster Justice Hammer, says that meeting and Bannon's comments were fake?
What about those 13 Russians?
Were they fake too?
"WASHINGTON (CBSNewYork/AP) -- Thirteen Russians and three Russian entities were charged Friday with an elaborate plot to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, federal prosecutors announced Friday.
---------------------------------------------------------
Methinks the poster Justice need do a little more due diligence.
This is, after all, Adult Swim.
One is expected to at least hold his own head above water.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Was shown that Trump Jr. threw that Russian OBAMA PLANT out when he saw what was going on. She then ran right to Obozo"
Tonight's reportage in the Washington Post offers an interesting perspective on the judge's ruling that the lawsuit by Smartamatic can proceed, and that there does appear to be a basis for arguing that Fox New did, indeed, act with malice.....which negates their 1st Amendment defense.
Here's a taster on the reportage: (underlining by my avatar)
"But perhaps the ruling’s most biting — and also potentially legally important — section involves (Tucker) Carlson.
In the course of laying out the legal requirements for Smartmatic to prove its case, the judge noted that the company must prove Fox met the standard of acting with “actual malice” — i.e. not merely promoting false claims, but doing so with malice.
And on that count, the judge says the best evidence that it did is Carlson.
That’s because Carlson, unlike the others, applied significant actual skepticism to the claims — and broadcast it.
It’s an episode many might have forgotten in the long ... run-up to the Jan. 6 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol. But there was a time in which none other than Carlson stepped forward to question the “stolen election” narrative that had taken hold in the Trump movement and in certain corners of his network. Carlson said on Nov. 19 that Powell’s claims were serious, but he also noted that she had yet to substantiate them. He said he had asked, over the course of a week, for the evidence and offered her his platform, but that she had declined.
(Tucker) Carlson said Powell “never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.” He said that when he invited her on his show, she became “angry and told us to stop contacting her.”
The episode alienated some Trump allies. But it also, in Cohen’s estimation, speaks to the possibility that Fox might meet the “actual malice” standard.
Here’s the section (with key parts bolded by us (WaPo)):
Should be an interesting case to monitor.
I hope it garners enough attention on this venue so that posters and lurkers can stay current on developments.
Take them to court.If FNC has to pay for a fake conspiracy theory, then CNN and PMSDNC have to pay for the fake Russia Russia Russia hoax perpetuated for the entire Trump presidency.
No.So, this time the cancel culture is contending that Tucker Carlson should be taken seriously. ??
Also, wouldn’t it be a benefit to FOX News that one of its on-air staff HAD broadcast concerns about what Powell had claimed. You see, you jokers can’t have it both ways. If Fox News had acted with “malice,” you wouldn’t have heard ON Fox News such expressions of doubt about Ms. Powell’s claims and the absence of verification.
You also don’t provide proof of any of your bullshit lies. See “justified lynchings”.
Jones lost.. BIGLYMaddow and Alex Jones used the same defense that Carlson used. If it worked for them it should work for Carlson and FOX. Nothing burger.
As is so often the case, you distort again, Farty.That's a shameless lie.
You cult pukes don't even remember how NOT to lie.
Go Trump, Biden sucks, and you're an idiot.
Take them to court.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
How did he harm them if he challenged the lawyer making the claim about her failure to support her allegations? Do you have clue one about this matter?No.
The company he harmed is taking him to court along with his masters at FAUX.
Hopefully a multi-billion dollar verdict will stop the lie factory.
It does not matter they are controlled opposition anyway.Jones lost.. BIGLY
Maddow won...BIGLY
Wonder who will own FOX when the case is done?
Go for it.Kyle be sayin' "No problem"
Kyle Rittenhouse announces initiative to challenge media in court - Washington Examiner
Kyle Rittenhouse announced a new initiative Monday aimed at challenging major media outlets in court. The Media Accountability Project will raise money for legal challenges against outlets Rittenhouse believes defamed him during his trial and hold them "accountable" more broadly. SARAH PALIN...www.washingtonexaminer.com
Figured out he is a dummy destined for ditch digging.Kyle be sayin' "No problem"
Kyle Rittenhouse announces initiative to challenge media in court - Washington Examiner
Kyle Rittenhouse announced a new initiative Monday aimed at challenging major media outlets in court. The Media Accountability Project will raise money for legal challenges against outlets Rittenhouse believes defamed him during his trial and hold them "accountable" more broadly. SARAH PALIN...www.washingtonexaminer.com