Is this deliberate misrepresentation, or do ya'll really not know what went down in Wisconsin? The conservative talking point is that Walker's bill was needed to close Wisconsin's deficit, and that the unions were demanding unsustainable benefits. But that simply is not true.
Unions conceded all spending cuts in the bill. They agreed to have their benefits cut. What they didn't want was to loose collective bargaining rights in the future... the right to have a say in future budget debates. At any time, Walker could have ended the stand off and moved on with a balanced budget, simply by agreeing to leave unions' collective bargaining rights untouched. The fact that he didn't shows where his true priorities are.
With the Democratic senators out of state, Walker didn't have a quorum, so he couldn't pass any budgetary bills. Than how did he pass the union busting law? He took everything budget related out of the bill, leaving in only the union busting part. So he didn't need a quorum any more, because the bill had nothing to do with the budget. This makes it clear... the parts that the unions were fighting against, the reason that the Democrats were out of state, had nothing to do with the budget.
Ryan inserted them into a budget bill because he wanted to make it appear that he needed to kill the unions to fix the budget.