Foster Family Loses License After Refusing to Accept LGBT Kids

[MayorQuimby]

Well, if accepting all children is a condition of maintaining their license, they technically were in breach of that. Fair or otherwise

It's not about accepting children for who they are, they haven't even met the kid yet, how would they know he/she was transgender? Rather, the issue is about the state forcing its political view on private citizens. It's telling the would-be foster parents that they have to be onboard with the radical transgender agenda, or lose their license. This is wrong.

 

[jotathought]

Where does it say to hate children?

Where does the state get the authority to punish families for not echoing its ideology?

 

[MisterBeale]

They won't accept gay kids? **** them then.

I read the video comments. That is basically the opinion of all those who bothered to leave one.

 

[braalian]

It's not about accepting children for who they are, they haven't even met the kid yet, how would they know he/she was transgender? Rather, the issue is about the state forcing its political view on private citizens. It's telling the would-be foster parents that they have to be onboard with the radical transgender agenda, or lose their license. This is wrong.

The rules are the rules. Presumably they agreed to the terms before they signed up to be foster parents

 

[MayorQuimby]

The rules are the rules. Presumably they agreed to the terms before they signed up to be foster parents

Those aren't any rules, they are rules that have nothing to do with being a good foster-parent and everything to do with advancing the state's radical transgender agenda.

 

[Eman623]

They won't accept gay kids? **** them then.

They are willing to accept any child.

 

[Eman623]

I read the video comments. That is basically the opinion of all those who bothered to leave one.

Those people clearly did not watch the video all the way to the end where the parents said they would accept any child into their home.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Those people clearly did not watch the video all the way to the end where the parents said they would accept any child into their home.

Yes. They are not objecting to the child, they are objecting to the state forcing its ideology on them.

 

[theHawk]

Like I said, they hate the idea of a challenge.

Seems like it’s a challenge to go against the pro-homo/tranny Agenda, as they are well funded and supported by the Corpo-state and will have their lives turned upside down, as what just happened.

It’s not challenging to push the homo-tranny agenda that is supported by every Dem run state and NGOs.

 

[ChristisKing]

Seems like it’s a challenge to go against the pro-homo/tranny Agenda, as they are well funded and supported by the Corpo-state and will have their lives turned upside down, as what just happened.

It’s not challenging to push the homo-tranny agenda that is supported by every Dem run state and NGOs.

I want to know why the people who removed this couple's license isn't as accepting of the parents' right to say no. If they're all about acceptance when are they going to start practicing what they preach and accept them for their religious beliefs?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Where does the state get the authority to punish families for not echoing its ideology?

If you won't accept all children you don't get to be foster parents.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They are willing to accept any child.

Evidently they aren't.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Are kids young enough to be placed in foster care old enough to even know if they’re LGBTQ?

Of course not.

This has nothing to do with the LG and Q, anyway. This is about foster parents being required by Massechesetts to encourage the transgender fad. Given that stance by Massechusetts all they would need to do to accommodate this loving family is not give them kids that are exressing that they are transgender.

This is about the left wanting to control everyone's lives, not just parents of transgender kids.

 

[jotathought]

If you won't accept all children you don't get to be foster parents.

Okay .. so that means that the State of Massachusetts gets to violate its own Foster Parents Bill of Rights, which they claim is "officially law." What exactly does "not to be discriminated against on the basis of religion, creed, ethnicity, national origin, age, or gender" mean?

Basic rights of foster parents:​

• To be treated with dignity and respect.
• To be free from all forms of discrimination in their role as a foster parent.
• To be free from any retaliation for asserting the rights outlined in this new law.
• To have information regarding the foster home (including all household members) be kept confidential.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Are kids young enough to be placed in foster care old enough to even know if they’re LGBTQ?

I second this. Due to the fact that they are in foster care, how they want to identify is most definitely not their top concern anyway.

God bless you and the couple always!!!

Holly

 

[Eman623]

If you won't accept all children you don't get to be foster parents.

They said in the video that they would accept any child.

 

[Moonglow]

Seems like it’s a challenge to go against the pro-homo/tranny Agenda, as they are well funded and supported by the Corpo-state and will have their lives turned upside down, as what just happened.

It’s not challenging to push the homo-tranny agenda that is supported by every Dem run state and NGOs.

You can't force people to be you.

 

[Eman623]

Evidently they aren't.

I invite you to watch the OP video and learn for yourself why they are being threatened with delicensing. Spoiler alert - it's not because they are refusing to accept certain children. In fact, they said the exact opposite - they would accept any child into their home.

 

[braalian]

I second this. Due to the fact that they are in foster care, how they want to identify is most definitely not their top concern anyway.

God bless you and the couple always!!!

Holly

I am firmly against the belief that LGBTQ people are “grooming” or recruiting children. That’s just fuckibg ridiculos.

But when it comes to teens and prepubescent kids stating they’re “trans”, I 100% believe the vast majority aren’t trans at all, as much as they’re just wanting to be different.

Be rebellious. Get attention. Make their parents uncomfortable. It’s fun to change their name and make mom and dad buy them new clothes. It’s fun for them to be a drama queen when strangers “misgender” them.

They’re teens, they LOVE the stupid-ass drama that goes along with suddenly being “trans”.

It reminds me of middle school kids deciding that they’re “goth”. They get to wear weird clothes and be melodramatic pain-in-the-asses for a few years. But they grow out of it. It’s a phase.

 

[Paddlefoot]

Its only Massachusetts buying votes with having that writing in a contract. Children aren't gay unless the parents say they are. Raise the children as you think you should.