Former KY Official Who Denied Gay Couples Marriage Licences Faces $350,000.00 Payment.

[The Sage of Main Street]

Her evangelical allies will raise the money for her.

Pray. Then Pay. That's the Way. To Make Their Day.

Did the NRA raise money for Zimmerman's defense? Don't support any GOPer organization that doesn't practice what it preaches.

 

[0311]

Really. How do you KNOW that. Define "harmed". How do you feel when your rights are denied????

You're having shit fits because Trump's name is being taken off the ballot. Imagine what you'll do when he loses again.

How have you been harmed if you can't vote for Trump, A$$hat???

ONE MORE TIME:

The United States Government DOES NOT OVERSEE OR SUPERVISE STATE ELECTIONS!

The individual states, all fifty of them manage and oversee their elections. It is up to the individual states to decide who can appear on that individual states ballot. The Federal Government has zero over a states ballot.

States Rights Cons...you love States Rights. Live with it.

 

[0311]

Lerner failed to obey the law. She imposed her personally held political beliefs on people coming into her office to request a tax exempt status. Lerner had no right under the law to deny right wing organizations tax exempt status based on those political beliefs As an employee of the IRS official her duty to obey the law and enforce the law, NOT to impose her personal political beliefs on others.



And that makes what difference?



She was imposing her political agenda on others



My argument is very factual…they are exactly the same. Lefty Lerner targets conservatives and gets a top notch retirement with benefits, Kim Davis targets gay people and is forced to pay a fine

That’s called “two tiered justice”. You only say it’s not the same because you don’t want to admit to the fact that it happened…exactly as I had said..

Lerner WAS NOT AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. Nor did she impose her personal faith practice on anyone.

Davis WAS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. She had a duty and the obligation to uphold all Federal, State and Local Law. She failed to do so. She imposed her personal religious belief on persons based solely on their sexual preference. She did not have a right to do so. Discrimination based on sexual identity is Unconstitutional.

Lener was a civil servant. She held no elective office. Davis was an elected official....one is NOT the same as the other.

Davis swore an oath to support, protect and defend the laws of the United States, she failed to do so.

As an ELECTED OFFICIAL Davis swore uphold all laws, Federal, State and Local. She knowingly and willingly and intent to do the same violated her oath as an elected official.

Lener was Civil Servant. She got smaked down (as she shoud have) her actions.

One is NOT the same as the other. Elected Officials have to be held to a higher standard. Davis violated the 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause). She has to pay for what she did. Lener has already done so. You're false equivalency fails.

 

[bripat9643]

SCOTUS said they had a constitutional right to be married. She denied them that constitutional right.

She violated the constitution.

How could she violate a right until the SC ruled on the issue?

 

[bripat9643]

Obergefell v. Hodges - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In other words, exactly what I said,

 

[bripat9643]

So she's just an asshole. Either way, it's going to cost her, BIGLY.

Thoughts And Prayers.

Has a court ruled on this issue yet?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Lerner WAS NOT AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. Nor did she impose her personal faith practice on anyone.

Davis WAS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. She had a duty and the obligation to uphold all Federal, State and Local Law. She failed to do so. She imposed her personal religious belief on persons based solely on their sexual preference. She did not have a right to do so. Discrimination based on sexual identity is Unconstitutional.

Lener was a civil servant. She held no elective office. Davis was an elected official....one is NOT the same as the other.

Davis swore an oath to support, protect and defend the laws of the United States, she failed to do so.

As an ELECTED OFFICIAL Davis swore uphold all laws, Federal, State and Local. She knowingly and willingly and intent to do the same violated her oath as an elected official.

Lener was Civil Servant. She got smaked down (as she shoud have) her actions.

One is NOT the same as the other. Elected Officials have to be held to a higher standard. Davis violated the 14th Amendment (Equal Protection Clause). She has to pay for what she did. Lener has already done so. You're false equivalency fails.

It doesn’t matter if they were elected or not, that has nothing to do with the situation. BOTH were caught doing something that wronged other people, but the one (a lefty) who wronged conservatives got a free pass, the one (a righty?) who harmed gay people got a huge fine.

Are you going to suggest that what Lerner did was ok because she was not elected?

 

[Dragonlady]

asking the government for permission to get married is fascist,,

youre a fascist and dont even seee it,,

So now that you've lost the argument, you're just going for pissy insults and abuse - as usual.

Gee and Lois Lerner..who targeted conservative groups got off Scott free…and was allowed to retire…with a pension.

Funny how that works if you are on the left…

Everything about this post is a lie, started with Lois Lerner is a card carrying REPUBLICAN.

Not only did Lerner not "target conservative groups", she was looking for groups on both sides whose goal was "political" because partisan political groups are not allowed to have non-profit designations. The ONLY groups denied non-profit status by Lerner were Democrat's groups.

So of course, you lie about everything that happened so you can whine like a toddler over the false idea of conservatives being targeted.

That's what you do. Feign outrage over ever little thing.

 

[Dragonlady]

Has a court ruled on this issue yet?

Why don't you read the links provided and answer your own questions?

 

[0311]

Lerner failed to obey the law. She imposed her personally held political beliefs on people coming into her office to request a tax exempt status. Lerner had no right under the law to deny right wing organizations tax exempt status based on those political beliefs As an employee of the IRS official her duty to obey the law and enforce the law, NOT to impose her personal political beliefs on others.



And that makes what difference?



She was imposing her political agenda on others



My argument is very factual…they are exactly the same. Lefty Lerner targets conservatives and gets a top notch retirement with benefits, Kim Davis targets gay people and is forced to pay a fine

That’s called “two tiered justice”. You only say it’s not the same because you don’t want to admit to the fact that it happened…exactly as I had said..

LENER WAS NOT AN ELECTED OFFICIAL!!!!!


Elected Officials have to be held to higher a standard of conduct. Nor did Lener forced her private religious beliefs on others. Your argument remains invalid.

Davis deliberately denied Same Sex Couple a marriage licence because of her religion. She stated that fact clearly. As an ELECTED OFFICIAL Davis had both the duty andd the obligation to enforce the laws of Kentucky and the United States. She used her personal religious beliefs as weapon to deny individuals their marriage licence.

Lener fucked up, but she did NOT impose her religion on others.

 

[0311]

Everything about this post is a lie, started with Lois Lerner is a card carrying REPUBLICAN.

You know how facts create problems MAGA. This is lame ass whataboutery from a person who has no real argument left to make.

 

[Dragonlady]

Lerner failed to obey the law. She imposed her personally held political beliefs on people coming into her office to request a tax exempt status. Lerner had no right under the law to deny right wing organizations tax exempt status based on those political beliefs As an employee of the IRS official her duty to obey the law and enforce the law, NOT to impose her personal political beliefs on others.



And that makes what difference?



She was imposing her political agenda on others



My argument is very factual…they are exactly the same. Lefty Lerner targets conservatives and gets a top notch retirement with benefits, Kim Davis targets gay people and is forced to pay a fine

That’s called “two tiered justice”. You only say it’s not the same because you don’t want to admit to the fact that it happened…exactly as I had said..

No she didn't. Her job was to screen applicants for political activities, which she did by searching for certain buzz words in their applications, one of the being "conservative". It was her JOB, to keep political groups from getting non-profit status.

In fact, the ONLY groups refused charitable status were 4 Democratic organizations.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

This so-called "Christian" needs to remember, as do most if not all so-called "Christians" need to remember that the United States of America has the Separation of Church and State.

There is no State Condoned/no State Mandated/State Controlled/State Sanctioned Religion. The Constitution is very clear on that. "Congress Shall No Law Respecting An Establishment of Religion or Preventing The Free Exericse Thereof."

Regarding what so-called "Christian" may or maynot believe, did not and does not have the right to impose her twist, sick as shit religion on anyone else.

A Molested Generation Loses the Will to Survive

Gayism is not just a religious issue, just like most of what is forbidden in the Ten Commandments isn't. Our instincts tell us that this fake sexuality is sick and destructive, both of the immature weakling inflicted by this obsessive addiction and of society in general. It is worse than infanticide, human sacrifice, and intertribal genocide, because those were chosen instead to prevent overpopulation.

 

[ThisIsMe]

So now that you've lost the argument, you're just going for pissy insults and abuse - as usual.


Everything about this post is a lie, started with Lois Lerner is a card carrying REPUBLICAN.

Not only did Lerner not "target conservative groups", she was looking for groups on both sides whose goal was "political" because partisan political groups are not allowed to have non-profit designations. The ONLY groups denied non-profit status by Lerner were Democrat's groups.

So of course, you lie about everything that happened so you can whine like a toddler over the false idea of conservatives being targeted.

That's what you do. Feign outrage over ever little thing.

Lois Lerner is a card carrying REPUBLICAN.

Huh? Where do you get this?

Lois Lerner - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Lerner has stated she is "not a political person" but is a registered Democrat and has voted for candidates from both parties.

Emails: Former IRS Official Lois Lerner Called Republicans ‘Crazies’ and ‘—holes’

House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp released new emails from former IRS official Lois Lerner as part of investigation examining potential criminal wrongdoing

time.com

Lois Lerner, the former Internal Revenue Service official at the center of a scandal involving that agency’s targeting of conservative groups, called Republicans “crazies” and “assholes,” according to emails released Wednesday.

She’s a lefty…

Not only did Lerner not "target conservative groups"

The ONLY groups denied non-profit status by Lerner were Democrat's groups.

HUH??? Where do you get this??!! You did see this in the news, right??

The fact that the IRS also scrutinized some lefty groups doesn’t change the fact that Lerner herself, a lefty, was given a sweetheart deal for all that she did, because being a lefty has its benefits I suppose…

IRS Targeting Scandal: Citizens United, Lois Lerner And The $20M Tax Saga That Won't Go Away

In 2013, Acting Director of Exempt Organizations at IRS, Lois Lerner, apologized to tax lawyers for the IRS's inappropriate targeting of political groups. Her comments set off a chain of events that would fire officials and consider impeachment proceedings for IRS Commissioner Koskinen's actions.

www.forbes.com

 

[Captain Caveman]

Whatever Progressive hummer thinks, she did not have the right to impose her religion on anyone, anywhere, at anytime.

The Law is the Law as you MAGA MAGGOTS like to say, and the says that Same Sex Marriage is the Law of the Land.

The problem is, the faggots want the glamour and excitement of a wedding, but not marriage.

 

[Skylar]

how dare that ***** think she can believe something outside the group think,,,

It was the rights of the people she violated where she ran foul. And a Supreme Court ruling.

But you go with 'groupthink' if that makes you comfy.