Former County Clerk Kim Davis Is Making The Headlines Again.

[JOSweetHeart]

Go here to learn about what is going on with her now. The write up says that she has been divorced three times. I would like to know why. To me, if her husbands messed around on her in any way, I don't blame her for getting a lawyer.

God bless and Ms. Kim always!!!

Holly

 

[0311]

Go here to learn about what is going on with her now. The write up says that she has been divorced three times. I would like to know why. To me, if her husbands messed around on her in any way, I don't blame her for getting a lawyer.

God bless and Ms. Kim always!!!

Holly

She is a homophobic asshole!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

She is a homophobic asshole!

Is she still with her 4th husband ? Thats pretty good. How can such a foul individual attract 4 actual men ?

 

[elektra]

She is a homophobic asshole!

Aren't you afraid of AIDS

 

[hjmick]

...The write up says that she has been divorced three times...

Funny. She refuses marriage licenses to same sex couples on the grounds that her religion prevents her from doing so, yet she's been divorced three times...

As you might imagine, there many, many more chapters and verses that could be cited, but I think folks will get the idea...


Luke 16:18:

“Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery."

Matthew 5:32:

"But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery."

Corinthians 7:10-11:

"To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord): the wife should not separate from her husband (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife."

Matthew 19:9

"And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”


So the tenets of her faith seem to be meaningless when it comes to her own life and happiness, but suddenly become important when they align with her own bigotry.


There's a word for that... but I think it's banned on this board.

​

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Is she still with her 4th husband ? Thats pretty good. How can such a foul individual attract 4 actual men ?

Another question is what did she find so fascinating about them out of all the other guys that she encountered in her life?

God bless you and Ms. Kim always!!!

Holly

P.S. Obviously, she and her first three husbands didn't agree with whatever is most important to her or she wouldn't even have one divorce in her history.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Another question is what did she find so fascinating about them out of all the other guys that she encountered in her life?

God bless you and Ms. Kim always!!!

Holly

P.S. Obviously, she and her first three husbands didn't agree with whatever is most important to her or she wouldn't even have one divorce in her history.

Im not sure she would have had a great deal of choice. Not wanting to be judgemental but she is severely lacking in the personality department

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

She is a homophobic asshole!

No such thing as homophobia.
Only homofascism and those who resist homofascism.

 

[Zincwarrior]

SCOTUS denied the cert this morning.

 

[postman]

Funny. She refuses marriage licenses to same sex couples on the grounds that her religion prevents her from doing so, yet she's been divorced three times...

As you might imagine, there many, many more chapters and verses that could be cited, but I think folks will get the idea...

Luke 16:18:
Matthew 5:32:
Corinthians 7:10-11:
Matthew 19:9

So the tenets of her faith seem to be meaningless when it comes to her own life and happiness, but suddenly become important when they align with her own bigotry.


There's a word for that... but I think it's banned on this board.

She chose to be a public servant. But wants to be selective in who in the public she serves.
If there are aspect of the job she objects to, then she picked the wrong career.

I'm sure you had clerks who refused marriage licenses to interfaith couples, interracial couples etc.

But the law made clear, such discrimination isn't allowed of not just public servants, but all who serve the public.

 

[postman]

SCOTUS denied the cert this morning.

To use the idiom, the fat lady sang.

At least for now the challenge to Obergerfell is over.

 

[martybegan]

To use the idiom, the fat lady sang.

At least for now the challenge to Obergerfell is over.

If the hard left keeps pushing the Trans nonsense, the backlash will only increase and spread to things such as this.

 

[postman]

If the hard left keeps pushing the Trans nonsense, the backlash will only increase and spread to things such as this.

This was a Clarence Thomas dream. Who wants all previous civil rights revisited like they did Roe v Wade.

He believes that non-enumerated rights need to be rooted in 17th and 18th century traditions.
And although it was clear that man is endowed with certain inalienable rights, Thomas believes they had to be either spelled out centuries ago, or embodied into the constitution to make them real.

In short, Thomas doesn't believe in a "living" constitution. That changes with society. And instead locks modern society into the norms of previous centuries.

 

[martybegan]

This was a Clarence Thomas dream. Who wants all previous civil rights revisited like they did Roe v Wade.

He believes that non-enumerated rights need to be rooted in 17th and 18th century traditions.
And although it was clear that man is endowed with certain inalienable rights, Thomas believes they had to be either spelled out centuries ago, or embodied into the constitution to make them real.

In short, Thomas doesn't believe in a "living" constitution. That changes with society. And instead locks modern society into the norms of previous centuries.

abortion isn't a civil right.

The Constitution can change, you just have to amend it to change it, not convince 5 of 9 unelected lawyers that it means something it clearly does not mean.

 

[Zincwarrior]

This was a Clarence Thomas dream. Who wants all previous civil rights revisited like they did Roe v Wade.

He believes that non-enumerated rights need to be rooted in 17th and 18th century traditions.
And although it was clear that man is endowed with certain inalienable rights, Thomas believes they had to be either spelled out centuries ago, or embodied into the constitution to make them real.

In short, Thomas doesn't believe in a "living" constitution. That changes with society. And instead locks modern society into the norms of previous centuries.

The irony is that his marriage would be illegal under miscegenation laws in much of the country in the 1960s and it required one of those evil cases (Loving) to overturn them.

 

[martybegan]

The irony is that his marriage would be illegal under miscegenation laws in much of the country in the 1960s and it required one of those evil cases (Loving) to overturn them.

Only ironic if you see race as the same thing as sexuality.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Only ironic if you see race as the same thing as sexuality.

Both are intrinsic so yes, ironic.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Only ironic if you see race as the same thing as sexuality.

Homosexuality is the equivalent of mucophagy.

 

[postman]

abortion isn't a civil right.

The Constitution can change, you just have to amend it to change it, not convince 5 of 9 unelected lawyers that it means something it clearly does not mean.

The first recorded evidence of induced abortion is from the Egyptian Ebers Papyrus in 1550 BCE.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Homosexuality is the equivalent of mucophagy.

Holy crap, you're usin' dem FIVE DOLLAR words!