For whom would Republicans vote?

[Preacher]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Hands down Putin. Or Orban. I like strong leaders. I despise leftists whose sole goal is the elimination in EVERYTHING they do of the white race.

 

[dblack]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

For **** sake, no. Every time we enter an election saying "anybody but ...", we get 'anybody' - ie someone even worse. We have to break out of this two-party death-spiral and stop voting for someone just because they're not someone someone else.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Putin would be better than any Democrat candidate.

The Stalinists deserve that answer, they are insufferable scum.

But it isn't True.

Putin is what Hillary and Bernie aspire to be, Take Hillary and magnify by a thousand and you have Putin, a KGB thug of the worst order who openly murders his opponents.

 

[eagle1462010]

The wall.

I don't agree with a wall across the entire southern border........imagine that........but I do agree with it in high traffic areas. In open expanses patrols and monitors would do the trick..............increased manpower is necessary for the border to be secured along with punishing business for hiring illegals.

Trade wars.

This is trying to force Free Trade when our so called allies place restrictions, subsidies, and tariffs on our Trade. Thought you'd be for Free Trade.......Free Trade doesn't exist in a nut shell. And doing nothing allows them to continue their abuses against us.

Licking the sweat off Putin's balls.

TDS and nothing more. People like you would get us into WWIII..........Yeah that would be great........Presidents for a long time talk to Russia as a matter of necessary business...............doesn't mean we are licking his dang balls...........that is just TDS extreme exageration.

Cutting taxes while increasing spending.

Unless we cut mandatory spending debts will continue to rise..........and if that isn't addressed we are screwed........Plenty of ideas to cut waste and spending...........he has been cutting manpower and staff in Federal Depts...........and trying to stop wasteful spending.

Encouraging racists and "pro-lifers".

Baloney.......as you ignore the left RAMPING up the divide in this country. wah.

Arbitrary, ego-driven decisions at every turn.

Yeah he has a large ego...........I don't care.......he's pushing his promises through.......many I agree on.

 

[Pogo]

Well, some folks found it worth discussing. Not required.
.

I'm just trying to figure out what it is you want to discuss.

Ron Reagan was on teevee and said that Republicans would rather vote for Putin than for a Democrat.

I just wanted to test his hypothesis, that's all. So far in the vote, it's holding up pretty well.
.

Thanks for the context. I hope Democrats aren't thinking of pushing for Putin's nomination in the Republican primary. That really backfired on them last time.

Uh, I think that was Rump.

"And Russia, if you're listening....."

Nope. I watched it go down. Despite all the noise about the Russians, the real conspiracy of the 2016 elections was the concerted liberal effort to get Trump nominated. It "worked".

Trust me, no Liberal in the world ever wanted a crude authoritarian egomaniacal asshole to be nominated for anything anywhere. That's the polar opposite of Liberalism.

 

[eagle1462010]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

For **** sake, no. Every time we enter an election saying "anybody but ...", we get 'anybody' - ie someone even worse. We have to break out of this two-party death-spiral and stop voting for someone just because they're not someone someone else.

I'd love to see 8 or 10 parties and break the chains.............but you must play the hand dealt..............Prime example is YODA.............who got Slick elected to his first term.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Republicans really would vote for an authoritarian dictator before Joe Biden, which is hilarious to me. Trump is a wannabe dictator, so I guess the shoe fits.

The list offered nothing other than authoritarian dictators.

 

[dblack]

The wall.

I don't agree with a wall across the entire southern border........imagine that........but I do agree with it in high traffic areas. In open expanses patrols and monitors would do the trick..............increased manpower is necessary for the border to be secured along with punishing business for hiring illegals.

Trade wars.

This is trying to force Free Trade when our so called allies place restrictions, subsidies, and tariffs on our Trade. Thought you'd be for Free Trade.......Free Trade doesn't exist in a nut shell. And doing nothing allows them to continue their abuses against us.

Licking the sweat off Putin's balls.

TDS and nothing more. People like you would get us into WWIII..........Yeah that would be great........Presidents for a long time talk to Russia as a matter of necessary business...............doesn't mean we are licking his dang balls...........that is just TDS extreme exageration.

Cutting taxes while increasing spending.

Unless we cut mandatory spending debts will continue to rise..........and if that isn't addressed we are screwed........Plenty of ideas to cut waste and spending...........he has been cutting manpower and staff in Federal Depts...........and trying to stop wasteful spending.

Encouraging racists and "pro-lifers".

Baloney.......as you ignore the left RAMPING up the divide in this country. wah.

Arbitrary, ego-driven decisions at every turn.

Yeah he has a large ego...........I don't care.......he's pushing his promises through.......many I agree on.

Thank you for cataloging your rationalizations. Hopefully they help you sleep at night.

 

[blackhawk]

None of the above.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Putin's not an American.

Why are you working for a Russian takeover?

Yeah dammit! We want our socialist/communist downfall to come with the proper birth certificate!

 

[Desperado]

Would not vote for any of the democrats listed, so you can figure out from that

 

[Uncensored2008]

Trust me, no Liberal in the world ever wanted a crude authoritarian egomaniacal asshole to be nominated for anything anywhere. That's the polar opposite of Liberalism.

Which is why you nominated Hillary Clinton and rigged the election in her favor....

Hillary is Putin lite.

 

[Pogo]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

Okay. Here's a quick what-if.

The Republican is Nikki Haley.
The Democrat is Tulsi Gabbard.

Who gets your vote, and why?

 

[eagle1462010]

The wall.

I don't agree with a wall across the entire southern border........imagine that........but I do agree with it in high traffic areas. In open expanses patrols and monitors would do the trick..............increased manpower is necessary for the border to be secured along with punishing business for hiring illegals.

Trade wars.

This is trying to force Free Trade when our so called allies place restrictions, subsidies, and tariffs on our Trade. Thought you'd be for Free Trade.......Free Trade doesn't exist in a nut shell. And doing nothing allows them to continue their abuses against us.

Licking the sweat off Putin's balls.

TDS and nothing more. People like you would get us into WWIII..........Yeah that would be great........Presidents for a long time talk to Russia as a matter of necessary business...............doesn't mean we are licking his dang balls...........that is just TDS extreme exageration.

Cutting taxes while increasing spending.

Unless we cut mandatory spending debts will continue to rise..........and if that isn't addressed we are screwed........Plenty of ideas to cut waste and spending...........he has been cutting manpower and staff in Federal Depts...........and trying to stop wasteful spending.

Encouraging racists and "pro-lifers".

Baloney.......as you ignore the left RAMPING up the divide in this country. wah.

Arbitrary, ego-driven decisions at every turn.

Yeah he has a large ego...........I don't care.......he's pushing his promises through.......many I agree on.

Thank you for cataloging your rationalizations. Hopefully they help you sleep at night.

I sleep fine at night for my choices..................when I voted for Trump I felt I was rolling the dice...........Happy about it........you on the other hand voting for someone who can't win made no real choice.......................More of you and we'd see a Leftist stacked Supreme Court.

You want Judicial Activism....................it's ok .............we made sure that didn't happen. You not so much.

 

[Preacher]

Republicans really would vote for an authoritarian dictator before Joe Biden, which is hilarious to me. Trump is a wannabe dictator, so I guess the shoe fits.

Putin was ELECTED. A Dictator would not have stepped down as required by the Russian Constitution and allowed Medved to run and then run again for President of Russia...EVERYONE calls a duly elected leader a dictator if they don't like them.

Mac1958 you should do a poll like this for the leftists as well! Trump or say like Stalin or Mao or Castro.

 

[Pogo]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

For **** sake, no. Every time we enter an election saying "anybody but ...", we get 'anybody' - ie someone even worse. We have to break out of this two-party death-spiral and stop voting for someone just because they're not someone someone else.

I'd love to see 8 or 10 parties and break the chains.............but you must play the hand dealt..............Prime example is YODA.............who got Slick elected to his first term.

I give up. Who the **** is "YODA"?

 

[dblack]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

For **** sake, no. Every time we enter an election saying "anybody but ...", we get 'anybody' - ie someone even worse. We have to break out of this two-party death-spiral and stop voting for someone just because they're not someone someone else.

I'd love to see 8 or 10 parties and break the chains.............but you must play the hand dealt..............Prime example is YODA.............who got Slick elected to his first term.

That's why all of my activism these days is centered on changing the election system. We need to get away from plurality, winner-take-all elections and move to a voting system that encourages consensus. (FairVote)

 

[dblack]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

For **** sake, no. Every time we enter an election saying "anybody but ...", we get 'anybody' - ie someone even worse. We have to break out of this two-party death-spiral and stop voting for someone just because they're not someone someone else.

I'd love to see 8 or 10 parties and break the chains.............but you must play the hand dealt..............Prime example is YODA.............who got Slick elected to his first term.

I give up. Who the **** is "YODA"?

Not sure what it stands for, but I think he's referring to the "spoiler-effect" - in this case the fact that Perot drew votes away from Bush Sr.

 

[eagle1462010]

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

Anyone that is not Hillary, Liz, Bernie or Joe.

For **** sake, no. Every time we enter an election saying "anybody but ...", we get 'anybody' - ie someone even worse. We have to break out of this two-party death-spiral and stop voting for someone just because they're not someone someone else.

I'd love to see 8 or 10 parties and break the chains.............but you must play the hand dealt..............Prime example is YODA.............who got Slick elected to his first term.

That's why all of my activism these days is centered on changing the election system. We need to get away from plurality, winner-take-all elections and move to a voting system that encourages consensus. (FairVote)

No reason to argue that again................You want to redistrict the entire United States.............No deal.............they already Gerrymander their butts off........that would go to extreme..........

And you want to vote for a 3rd party who would have to give his votes to the finalist............kinda like the electoral college in reverse......so your candidate could sway and entire election with minimal votes..............No DICE.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm just trying to figure out what it is you want to discuss.

Ron Reagan was on teevee and said that Republicans would rather vote for Putin than for a Democrat.

I just wanted to test his hypothesis, that's all. So far in the vote, it's holding up pretty well.
.

Thanks for the context. I hope Democrats aren't thinking of pushing for Putin's nomination in the Republican primary. That really backfired on them last time.

Uh, I think that was Rump.

"And Russia, if you're listening....."

Nope. I watched it go down. Despite all the noise about the Russians, the real conspiracy of the 2016 elections was the concerted liberal effort to get Trump nominated. It "worked".

Trust me, no Liberal in the world ever wanted a crude authoritarian egomaniacal asshole to be nominated for anything anywhere. That's the polar opposite of Liberalism.

Yet, you nominated both Hillary and Obama.