For whom would Republicans vote?

For whom would you vote?

  • I don't have the balls to say

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    36
You're a real one brain cell disaster...


:rolleyes:



USMB - Where your voice counts.. Unless you're not in Don't Taz Me Bro's little clique and you defeat his cronies in debates, then woe be unto you.



^ nice sig line, cry baby :itsok:



sorry to hear you feel so victimized in your imaginary school yard :laugh:







I’ve compiled a short—and by no means exhaustive—list of the open questions about matters potentially involving criminal law swirling around the president, his campaign, his company, and his family.

  1. Trump campaign aides and associates met with Russian agents in advance of the Russian hacks and releases of Democratic internal communications. Did these meetings lead to any form of coordination between the Trump campaign, the Trump family, or Trump supporters on the one hand and Russian intelligence and its proxy, WikiLeaks, on the other?
  2. Russia engaged in large-scale and illegal expenditures on social media to help elect Trump. Did the Trump campaign, the Trump family, or Trump supporters coordinate or assist in any way with these violations of U.S. law?
  3. Trump campaign aides reportedly met with representatives of Persian Gulf governments who offered to violate U.S. law to help elect Trump. What came of those meetings?
  4. How much Russian money has flowed into the Trump family and the Trump Organization since Trump suddenly and mysteriously became cash-rich in 2006?
  5. Did all the foreign funds flowing into the Trump family and Trump Organization comply with applicable U.S. laws on taxation and money laundering?
15 Criminal-Law Questions Surrounding the President
 
Trump won't win re-election for multiple reasons:

So, Hillary has it in the bag then?

1. He will never be more popular than he was on election night. All polls show him below the 46% he won in the election.

He has a higher popularity than your god did at this point in his term, and Obama won reelection.

2. Winning Wisconsin and Michigan were total flukes that won't happen again in 2020. Romney got more votes in 2012 in Wisconsin than Trump got in 2016 in Wisconsin, but lost. What that tells you is that it was Democratic turn out and not Trump that won Wisconsin for Trump.
3. Democrats are more fired up than they were in 2016.
4. Trump only won Pennsylvania by 40,000 votes. A slim victory that won't happen again.
5. Trump can't take any other states that he did not win in 2016. That means he won't be able to replace the electoral votes he will lose, when he loses Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2020.

Trump is toast no matter how you stack it. There is a good chance he won't even be running for office in 2020.

Yep, you got him now.

The faithless electors will recount the Russian collusion..

:lmao:

I never voted for Obama. But Trump has had the lowest average approval rating since taking office of any President in history. His average is around 39% to 40% with a low of 35% and a high of 45%. You can't be re-elected President when only 40% of the people approve the job your doing. Obama's approval ratings moved up to nearly 50% just before he was re-elected President.
You forget to mention that Trump's low was when he was elected and his high is right now.

So his approval rating went up 10 points in less than half a term and they are continuing to slowly rise.

He didn't "fail to mention" anything. He is a Marxist and is flat out lying.

Trump has approval ratings consistent of those Obama had.

{
  • President Donald Trump's approval rating is at an all-time high of 45% in the Gallup weekly tracking poll.
  • His disapproval rating is 50%, near its record low.
  • Trump's approval rating at this point in his presidency lines up with the ratings of other presidents at similar times in their first terms.
  • His new spike in approval could take a hit because of backlash against the administration's controversial policy that has led to the separating of families at the US-Mexico border.}
}

Trump's approval rating just reached its highest level yet in the gold standard of presidential indicators

Never assume the Stalinists are mistaken when they make claims. The democrats are ******* LIARS, they are maliciously and deliberately lying.
Compared to Congress specifically Trump has a 64% support rating according to Rasmussen.
 
I think those fed up with the bullshit should all change their avies to Russian ones. Anyone game? :D
 
This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.
This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

I will not vote fro the left..........period.......

Congrats Putin..................

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.
Putin would be better than any Democrat candidate.


Now I ask you fellas, what kind of choices is that? The 1st 2 are both Socialist, and the last 1 insinuates you have been castrated!

So, in the choices put forth by the OP, you either choose an American Socialist, or Russian Socialist, or claim someone cut off your balls.

Now, if that is NOT the dichotomy of attempting to get an answer to a question you want, I don't know what is. Hey Mac, you ever think about joining a polling firm?

That is like me asking------------> Who would you rather vote for,

A. Joe Biden

B. Hillary Clinton

C. John Kerry

D. You are impotent in bed

Then when the poll is over, proclaim, THE DEMOCRAT IS GOING TO WIN THE WHITEHOUSE, because 100% of the people said so, and anyone that didn't is neutered, lol.
The point of the question isn't about the Democrats I named, it's about Democrats in general.

Ron Reagan said that Republicans would vote for Putin over a Democrat, and some of them here proved his point.
.
Ron Reagan would vote for AMLO over Trump and the Republicans.
 
This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.
This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.

I will not vote fro the left..........period.......

Congrats Putin..................

This was brought up in another thread, but I'd like to take a poll and see who says what.

Serious question, please expand on your answer.
Putin would be better than any Democrat candidate.


Now I ask you fellas, what kind of choices is that? The 1st 2 are both Socialist, and the last 1 insinuates you have been castrated!

So, in the choices put forth by the OP, you either choose an American Socialist, or Russian Socialist, or claim someone cut off your balls.

Now, if that is NOT the dichotomy of attempting to get an answer to a question you want, I don't know what is. Hey Mac, you ever think about joining a polling firm?

That is like me asking------------> Who would you rather vote for,

A. Joe Biden

B. Hillary Clinton

C. John Kerry

D. You are impotent in bed

Then when the poll is over, proclaim, THE DEMOCRAT IS GOING TO WIN THE WHITEHOUSE, because 100% of the people said so, and anyone that didn't is neutered, lol.
The point of the question isn't about the Democrats I named, it's about Democrats in general.

Ron Reagan said that Republicans would vote for Putin over a Democrat, and some of them here proved his point.
.
Ron Reagan would vote for AMLO over Trump and the Republicans.
Could be! Doesn't change what happened here.
.
 
I think it's significant that you named the usual rogues gallery of Democrats aspirants. And can't be divorced from the results. What this thread might be telling us is that if Democrats nominate the same old jokers, pushing the same tired platform, they will lose.
Okay, so which of the top younger Democrats should I have used?

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez? Kamala Harris? Corey Booker? Kirsten Gillibrand?

Reagan made a general point, therefore so did I. And we got the responses we did. People could have made distinctions, but they ran with Vlad.
.
 
Last edited:
I think it's significant that you named the usual rogues gallery of Democrats aspirants. And can't be divorced from the results. What this thread might be telling us is that if Democrats nominate the same old jokers, pushing the same tired platform, they will lose.
Okay, so which of the top younger Democrats should I have used?

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez? Kamala Harris? Corey Booker? Kirsten Gillibrand?

Reagan made a general point, therefore so did I. And we got the responses we did. People could have made distinctions, but they ran with Vlad.
.

So try another poll, with better choices.

The reason it bugs me is that I really think Democrats are going to just keep trying the same shit. And lose. We can't afford that. There really are a significant number of Republicans who'd love to bail on Trump. But Democrats aren't exactly helping them make their decision. They're making it harder.
 
Trump won't win re-election for multiple reasons:

So, Hillary has it in the bag then?

1. He will never be more popular than he was on election night. All polls show him below the 46% he won in the election.

He has a higher popularity than your god did at this point in his term, and Obama won reelection.

2. Winning Wisconsin and Michigan were total flukes that won't happen again in 2020. Romney got more votes in 2012 in Wisconsin than Trump got in 2016 in Wisconsin, but lost. What that tells you is that it was Democratic turn out and not Trump that won Wisconsin for Trump.
3. Democrats are more fired up than they were in 2016.
4. Trump only won Pennsylvania by 40,000 votes. A slim victory that won't happen again.
5. Trump can't take any other states that he did not win in 2016. That means he won't be able to replace the electoral votes he will lose, when he loses Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania in 2020.

Trump is toast no matter how you stack it. There is a good chance he won't even be running for office in 2020.

Yep, you got him now.

The faithless electors will recount the Russian collusion..

:lmao:

I never voted for Obama. But Trump has had the lowest average approval rating since taking office of any President in history. His average is around 39% to 40% with a low of 35% and a high of 45%. You can't be re-elected President when only 40% of the people approve the job your doing. Obama's approval ratings moved up to nearly 50% just before he was re-elected President.

Sure you can, if the dems put up another Hillary model.
 
I never voted for Obama. But Trump has had the lowest average approval rating since taking office of any President in history.

Are you lying from stupidity, or do you just spend a lot of time watching CNN?

His average is around 39% to 40% with a low of 35% and a high of 45%. You can't be re-elected President when only 40% of the people approve the job your doing. Obama's approval ratings moved up to nearly 50% just before he was re-elected President.

Those are the polls that had Felonia Milhouse Von Pantsuit taking 48 states, right Comrade?

You show your intelligence by again staking your future on them.

Uh, I'm just showing what the actual polling data has shown. Its accurate. Trump is toast. We'll talk about again on election night 2020, provided Trump is able to make it to that point.
 
At this point in our country I will NEVER find a reason to vote for a Democrat. That party, the party of middle America and the working man is dead. It was strangled by the SJW's and their crusade to destroy American exceptionalism & American values.

The democratic party is DEAD


You certainly seem to enjoy indulging yourself in wishful thinking!
 
At this point in our country I will NEVER find a reason to vote for a Democrat. That party, the party of middle America and the working man is dead. It was strangled by the SJW's and their crusade to destroy American exceptionalism & American values.

The democratic party is DEAD


You certainly seem to enjoy indulging yourself in wishful thinking!
You may enjoy being a perpetual pessimist but I always try to look forward
 
15th post
At this point in our country I will NEVER find a reason to vote for a Democrat. That party, the party of middle America and the working man is dead. It was strangled by the SJW's and their crusade to destroy American exceptionalism & American values.

The democratic party is DEAD


You certainly seem to enjoy indulging yourself in wishful thinking!
You may enjoy being a perpetual pessimist but I always try to look forward

Just look at his avatar.. that is not the face of happiness and optimism.
 
Still cant get past 22 votes for ******* putin.
This place can be so sad sometimes..
Mac1958
 
Back
Top Bottom