"However it is not in my nature to be afraid of the lion's den so I will walk in, but know this I will walk in with my eyes open !!!"
I see: you're so brave that you have to announce that fact. Duly noted.
As an aside, I find the chest-thumping 'impressive' only in an inverse fashion.
I will not engage in an argument with you as I find your responses to me to be both insulting and demeaning. I will however answer some of the issues that you have brought up because they are full of garbage, and I will attempt to do so in a courteous manner which you seem incapable of.
I did not do any " chest thumping " all my purpose was in doing this was to show people that I knew what I was letting myself in for
>>>>>>Considering we're on a freakin' CHAT BOARD - what is there for you to be afraid of???? Seriously, I think you were waaay tooo drama queen with that announcement, which is why the faint whiff of mockery in my response.
I'm quite capable of being courteous: I just have small patience with pomposity.
PatCat - where have you been when people are stating as 'FACT' that 'the Bolshevik leadership, from Marx and Lenin down, were mostly Jews'?
Do you feel a similar compulsion to get THEM to present information honestly and accurately?
I don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about if you can provide me with any posts on this subject that have occurred while I have been on this board I will be happy to respond
>>>>Glad to know it. I'll keep you posted on that.....
PPS Just curious Marg, what do you think Roudy's motivations are for vilifying people all over the place ?
What are Seal's? What are Ima's?
I do not agree, BTW, with your 'legal' definition of hate speech, but that's OK - I think it's too limited.
What is the problem here Marg, I answered your question politely and yet when I ask you a similar question all I get is the DUCK AND DODGE, I am not your inferior on this board. I will admit that my question, like yours can be seen as a trap but I answered yours now why don't you at least take a swing at mine.
Frankly I do not care what his motivations are. I don't need someone else's opinions - and I don't care to spend time playing in others' heads.
BTW it is not my definition of hate speech it is the laws so your problem is with the law !!!
Nope. This isn't a courthouse, and I'm not trying to press charges - so that's not automatically the 'standard' which need be applied. And I'm not certain where one would find a 'legal' definition to begin with.
Incidentally, I do not consider using phrases like 'full of garbage' when referring to another's arguments to be maintaining courtesy - particularly when you then fail completely to even identify *which* arguments are purportedly 'full of garbage', let alone to demonstrate how you think that is so.
I have explained more than once that I reject Seal's and your initial premise, namely that 'Jews deserve to be hated by the black community' because ONE poster here allegedly misquoted Dr King.
So far, you have not provided any detail on where and how the quotes by Dr King were 'massaged' or 'abused' or whatever. Nor have you provided any sources for your contention that 'Jews are always complaining that Blacks don't like them'.
Until you can provide some unbiased sources to substantiate those allegations - there really isn't anything for me to discuss with Seal or you. Because it may as well not exist, if your words are the only source you can give.
If that bothers you, it is a shame - but that's a pretty standard requirement in any debate or investigation.
As are we ALL - including myself! - simply some random ID on a chat board, there is no 'reference' nor 'credentials' which comes along with our words here. All we have are the reliability of the sources we cite to back up our points. And perhaps there is something within our words, if others have read enough of those.......
I'm glad you consider Hoss a friend - I do, too.
