This post is the biggest b.s. ever. If he was a "she" and "she" didn't have surgery (as you are on record stating) - where in the hell are her breasts?!? Epic fail.
Typical liberal propaganda. Post tatted up dude and try to scare people into believing that it's a "woman" and thus justifies society tolerating the repulsive deviant behavior of disturbed people wanting to use the locker rooms and restrooms of the opposite sex.
He didn't have
the surgery. As in, he still has a vagina - and according to the law in question, he's a woman.
He may have had breast reduction, I don't know. Hormone therapy does a lot.
Well....I guess I'll just end with these two questions then:
1.) I just Googled this lunatic to see if there was any truth to this. The first thing I noticed? The protruding Adam's Apple. How do you explain that? Surgery to implant something you don't see in women???
2.) Second, and much more damning, how do you explain the inexplicable male pattern baldness? You can see where his head his clearly shaved and then you can see where it is
clearly bald (no "shadow" at all, no remnants of any hair). I suppose "she" had surgery to create male pattern baldness???
By the way - if in fact this thing really was a "she" at some point, I can tell you absolutely, unequivocally that "she" has done some
serious steroids (trust me - I've spent my life around the stuff). And steroids are 100%
illegal in all 50 states. So..."she" would pose no threat and wouldn't be nearly as scary to women if "she" were in prison where "she" belongs or if "she" wasn't doing steroids. On any and all levels, this argument fails.