For the record: He never said it and he never will.

You ready to admit Foxfyre that you are 100% WRONG.
Show me the unedited video or quotation in its full context and not what CNN says they he says or has said or how CNN interprets what he says/has said. Sure he expresses opinions as we all do. But you will not find him ordering or mandating anything like revenge or retribution against political opponents.

When you can find unedited evidence in full context of him saying it and not how rabid leftwinger inerpret what he says/said, THEN I'll admit I'm wrong. And not until then.
 
Show me the unedited video or quotation in its full context and not what CNN says they he says or has said or how CNN interprets what he says/has said. Sure he expresses opinions as we all do. But you will not find him ordering or mandating anything like revenge or retribution against political opponents.

When you can find unedited evidence in full context of him saying it and not how rabid leftwinger inerpret what he says/said, THEN I'll admit I'm wrong. And not until then.
I could post dozens.
You will just deny them all.

He has CLEARLY said "these people need to be locked up."
You haven't honestly seen ANY of those clips?
 
I could post dozens.
You will just deny them all.

He has CLEARLY said "these people need to be locked up."
You haven't honestly seen ANY of those clips?
So if you could post dozens, surely it wouldn't be too much trouble to post one? So far not a single soul has done so.
 
So if you could post dozens, surely it wouldn't be too much trouble to post one? So far not a single soul has done so.
Because you will just deny it.
No Matter what.
Screenshot 2024-12-18 at 1.38.27 PM.webp


You will deny this, even though it is in his TWEET.
Does a Tweet Count?
Or is that your excuse?
You ask for a quotation, in full context.
Here it is, ONE of Many.
I'm curious how you will attempt to DENY this, a direct quote, in full context, directly from trump himself.
Screenshot 2024-12-18 at 1.40.49 PM.webp
 
Because you will just deny it.
No Matter what.
View attachment 1055324

You will deny this, even though it is in his TWEET.
Does a Tweet Count?
Or is that your excuse?
You ask for a quotation, in full context.
Here it is, ONE of Many.
I'm curious how you will attempt to DENY this, a direct quote, in full context, directly from trump himself.
View attachment 1055325
Well unless you try me you just said a lie about me too.

Read the OP. Read the OP. Read the OP.

Don't give me memes or what others say he said, intended, proposed, ordered. Give me the unedited audio or video or a credible source with his exact words--all in their full context--or you are just parroting what others want you to believe.

Saying "he/she should be hung" is an opinion. Saying "I will literally hang him or her or have him or her hung" is a policy statement or intention.

Saying they all should be in prison is an opinion. Saying I will see to it that they all go to prison is a policy statement or intention.

So again if you are unable to post the unedited quotations, audio or video in their FULL CONTEXT, I will stand by my post that he has never said he will seek revenge against his political opponents. And those who continue to say that he did are just as dishonest as all the others who are desperately wanting to believe he said that. He didn't.
 
Give me the unedited audio or video or a credible source with his exact words--all in their full context
A tweet from trump is indeed a credible source......is it NOT?

Are you saying the tweet from trump is FAKE?
 
A tweet from trump is indeed a credible source......is it NOT?

Are you saying the tweet from trump is FAKE?
Can you read? Do you know the difference between a stated personal opinion and a statement of policy or intention? If not I suggest you join the others in a good remedial reading comprehension course.
 
"An NPR investigation has found more than 100 times when Trump has said his rivals, critics and even private citizens should be investigated, prosecuted, put in jail or otherwise punished."




Dumbest person on the planet:

"But he never said it!"
 
Can you read? Do you know the difference between a stated personal opinion and a statement of policy or intention? If not I suggest you join the others in a good remedial reading comprehension course.
Lay off *****.

You won't accept ANY facts.
That is a FACT.
 
I know this is a waste of time -- you can't prove anything to a Trumpster -- but just for fun:


RMjJVRh.jpg

Hey fucktard, Retribution is payment for a wrongness received. What are you saying, *****?
What wrongness is there to retribute, hmm? :abgg2q.jpg:
 
FOR THE RECORD:

I challenge any and/or every leftist/Democrat/woke person/hopelessly TDS afflicted to show me a single video or audio clip of Trump saying he intends to get revenge on his political opponents, no matter how bad they were. Never happened. Never will. He has never said that no matter how much you dishonestly spin what he actually has said.

Don't give me memes. Don't give me quotes of what others say he has said. And don't give me edited video or audio that leaves out the full context and intent of what he is saying. Plucking one line out of a conversation and leaving out all the conversation that qualifies that one line is dishonesty of the worst sort.

Let's see some integrity from the left. If you are going to accuse Trump, show your evidence.


/thread
 
Lay off *****.

You won't accept ANY facts.
That is a FACT.
I accept facts, I don't accept what the TDS numbnuts call facts that aren't facts at all. Anybody accusing a person should be able to show his/her evidence. If you don't have it, have some integrity and admit it. Insulting me only strengthens my position on this.
 

Again all taken out of the full context. Not allowed per the OP Having fun chanting at a rally is also a statement of opinion and is not a policy statement or intention.

Read the OP. Read the OP. Read the OP.
 
I accept facts, I don't accept what the TDS numbnuts call facts that aren't facts at all. Anybody accusing a person should be able to show his/her evidence. If you don't have it, have some integrity and admit it. Insulting me only strengthens my position on this.
Listen Up.

If you accept facts, can you acknowledge that trump has said on 100's of occasions, that he wants 'political opponents' Locked Up.

What's the Big Deal?
Trump shows Loyalty, and Attacks the Not-Loyal.
This is pretty obvious.
WHY is this such a big problem for you to admit?
 
Listen Up.

If you accept facts, can you acknowledge that trump has said on 100's of occasions, that he wants 'political opponents' Locked Up.

What's the Big Deal?
Trump shows Loyalty, and Attacks the Not-Loyal.
This is pretty obvious.
WHY is this such a big problem for you to admit?
He has said on multiple occasions that they should be locked up, that they should be in jail. But EVERY SINGLE TIME he has been pressed on that he has consistently said he will not push that or ask for that.

Again at issue is the integrity of the political opposition acknowledging the difference between a personal opinion and a stated policy or intention. So far not a single TDS infected leftist on this board has had the integrity to distinguish between those two things much less post any evidence that Trump has EVER said he will push for, ask for, or prosecute his political opponents. He has said numerous times that he will not.

The latest time I am aware of was his recent hour long interview on "Meet the Press":

". . .KRISTEN WELKER

I want to pause here, because what you’re saying is significant. Because you wrote on Truth Social in 2023 that you’re going to appoint a real special prosecutor to go after Joe Biden. Now you’re saying you’re not going to do that.

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

I will say this, no, I’m not doing that unless I find something that I think is reasonable, but that’s not going to be my decision. That’s going to be Pam Bondi’s decision, and, to a different extent, Kash Patel, assuming they’re both there, and I think they’re both going to get approved. But I — I — you know, while you ask me that, what they’ve done to me with weaponization is a disgrace.

KRISTEN WELKER:

We’ll get to some of that, sir --

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

No, no, wait, wait, wait, you can’t do one without the other. In the history of our country, nothing like this has ever happened. And I’ve won these cases. I’ve won every one and the rest are in the process of being won. Deranged Jack Smith is on his way back to The Hague where he can execute people. This is where he should have stayed. I don’t — I think he’s dangerous even being there. But I’ll tell you what, what they’ve done to me in terms of weaponization, indictments, impeachments and everything else. And in the end, it probably helped, because I got the biggest vote, the most votes any Republican’s ever gotten in history.

KRISTEN WELKER:

Do — Pam Bondi talks about investigating the investigators. Do you want her to investigate Jack Smith based --

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

I want her to do what she wants to do.

KRISTEN WELKER:

-- do you want to see Jack Smith investigated?

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

Well, I think he’s very corrupt, but I want her to do whatever she —

KRISTEN WELKER:

Are you going to direct her --

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

No, I’m not, I’m not . . ."


And further that Truth Social post was in response to the weaponization of the Biden government appointing a political lackey to go after Trump and he retorted that he would appoint a REAL special prosecutor to go after Biden. But that would be to investigate the accusations of malfeasance re Hunter et al and possible bribery/payoffs to Joe himself and not in retaliation for what Biden has done to him (Trump).

Subsequently he has said he wants the weaponization of government against political opposition to stop. He does not want revenge for what has been done to him, but he won't stop his DOJ for going after people who have committed actual crimes. ACTUAL crimes and not made up crimes or maybe crimes. ACTUAL crimes.
 
Last edited:
15th post
She has been shown and is so disassociated with Trump Devotional Syndrome she is no longer knows the dif between truth and falsity.
 
Hey fucktard, Retribution is payment for a wrongness received. What are you saying, *****?
What wrongness is there to retribute, hmm? :abgg2q.jpg:
All of your perceived victimization from a country that has been so horrible to you, of course.

You poor, innocent, helpless little things. Trump loves you. Trump will take care of you.

:itsok:
 
All of your perceived victimization from a country that has been so horrible to you, of course.

You poor, innocent, helpless little things. Trump loves you. Trump will take care of you.

:itsok:
That is slap delusional. 😐
 
Back
Top Bottom