For Thangalin.......Singapore Goes Through With Execution

GotZoom

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2005
5,719
368
48
Cordova, TN
I know you didn't want to see this...but....he did the crime...

http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26541&highlight=execution

-----

SINGAPORE — Singapore executed an Australian heroin trafficker on Friday despite a warning by Australia's prime minister that the hanging would sour relations between their countries.

The case has caused an outcry in Australia where opponents of the execution held vigils in cities around the country, with bells and gongs sounding 25 times at the hour of Nguyen's execution.

"I just think it's barbaric, it's wrong, it's disturbing," said Elizabeth Welch, a 54-year-old counselor at a vigil in Sydney.

Vietnam-born Tuong Van Nguyen, 25, was hanged before dawn despite numerous appeals from Australian leaders for his life to be spared. He received a mandatory death sentence after he was caught with 14 ounces of heroin at the city-state's Changi Airport in 2002, en route from Cambodia to Australia.

Nguyen's death came amid fresh debate about capital punishment in the United States, where North Carolina's governor denied clemency to a man who killed his wife and father-in-law. Kenneth Lee Boyd was executed by lethal injection early Friday in the 1,000th execution in the United States since the death penalty resumed in 1977.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard said his government would not take diplomatic action against Singapore. But he said the execution will affect relations "on a people-to-people, population-to-population basis."

Dressed in black, a dozen friends and supporters stood outside the maximum-security Changi Prison hours before the 6 a.m. hanging. Candles and handwritten notes containing sympathetic messages and calls for an end to Singapore's death penalty were placed outside the prison gates.

Nguyen's twin brother, Nguyen Khoa, entered the prison compound, but did not attend the execution. As he left, he hugged a prison officer and shook the hand of another. Nguyen Tuong Van had said he was trafficking heroin to help pay off his twin's debts.

Singapore says its tough laws and penalties for drug trafficking are an effective deterrent against a crime that ruins lives, and that foreigners and Singaporeans must be treated alike. It said Nguyen's appeals for clemency were carefully considered.

"We take a very serious view of drug trafficking — the penalty is death," Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said Thursday during a visit to Germany.

Nguyen was caught with more than 26 times the 0.53 ounces of heroin that draws a mandatory death penalty. The Home Affairs Ministry statement said the amount was enough to supply 26,000 doses of heroin, and had a street value of nearly $800,000.

Australia scrapped the death penalty in 1973 and hanged its last criminal in 1967, while Singapore has executed more than 100 people for drug-related offenses since 1999.

According to local media, Singapore has granted clemency to six inmates on death row — all Singaporeans — since independence in 1965.

A private Mass was held for Nguyen at a chapel on the grounds of a Roman Catholic convent. He was to be buried in Melbourne.

Physical contact between Nguyen and visitors had been barred in past days. But one of his Australian lawyers, Julian McMahon, said Nguyen's mother, Kim, had been allowed to hold her son's hand and touch his face during her last visit on Thursday.

"That was a great comfort to her," McMahon said.

Nguyen's supporters outside the prison included Gopalan and Krishnan Murugesu, teenage twin brothers whose father, Shanmugam, was executed in May after he was caught with 2.2 pounds of marijuana on Aug. 29, 2003, as he returned from Malaysia by motorcycle.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,177407,00.html
 
There's a reason the crime rate in Singapore is so low. I'm not suggesting we adopt the same laws, but then again, you can't argue with results.
 
He did not desreve the fate he suffered.

Taking his fate to its logical extreme here in the US
would mean thousands of executions a year, as bad as we are.

I think the punishment is worse than the effect of
lesser punishment.

Where there has been no violence give the felon another chance.
 
USViking said:
He did not desreve the fate he suffered.

Taking his fate to its logical extreme here in the US
would mean thousands of executions a year, as bad as we are.

I think the punishment is worse than the effect of
lesser punishment.

Where there has been no violence give the felon another chance.
Know what laws you may be breaking when visiting another country. Duh!
 
We can send some pro drug legalization folks over there to make them quit being so nasty and intolerant. We're leniant as hell here--they need to go somewhere where they can be of help. :teeth:
 
USViking said:
He did not desreve the fate he suffered.

Taking his fate to its logical extreme here in the US
would mean thousands of executions a year, as bad as we are.

I think the punishment is worse than the effect of
lesser punishment.

Where there has been no violence give the felon another chance.

He absolutely did deserve it.. Pay attention to where you're traveling.. What are their laws? What are the consequences for breaking them? Then, put 2 + 2 together, and don't break them. :)

We could stand a few thousand executions per year ourselves...
 
USViking said:
He did not desreve the fate he suffered.

Taking his fate to its logical extreme here in the US
would mean thousands of executions a year, as bad as we are.

I think the punishment is worse than the effect of
lesser punishment.

Where there has been no violence give the felon another chance.

Is the man or woman who overdoses because of a drug pusher any less dead than someone gunned down by a serial killer?

Fact is if we had those kind of laws it wouldn't be that bad in the states. No one would be dumb enough to traffick here. And it would likely save the lives of many inner city americans.
 
After we adopt the death penalty for recreational drugs, we should also enact similarly strict measures against alcohol and tobacco. Alcohol is certainly deadlier than pot, and tobacco is more addictive. Prohibition could have been won, if only we hadn't cut and run. Then we need to move towards criminalizing soft drinks, caffeine, and junk food. Think of the children!
 
Avatar4321 said:
Is the man or woman who overdoses because of a drug pusher any less dead than someone gunned down by a serial killer?

Fact is if we had those kind of laws it wouldn't be that bad in the states. No one would be dumb enough to traffick here. And it would likely save the lives of many inner city americans.

The appropriate comparison would be drug pushers and gun store owners, not pushers and serial killers. Punishment should fit the crime, not be made excessive because of difficulties in enforcement. I'm not saying that pushers should get a free pass, but capital punishment for transporting drugs is as excessive as cutting off a hand for shoplifting.
 
You can determine the value a culture puts on things by the punishment they dole out if those things are destroyed or threatened.

WE have the death penalty for treason, murder, kidnapping I think, maybe not.

It used to be if you stole a horse, you could be hanged or shot.
Horses were extremely vital to the survival of people in the west then.

A jungle tribe in south america gives out its worst penalty for failure to protect the eggs of the chiokana bird, the birds eggs are what the tribe relies on the most for survival.

SIngapore is a unique small island nation. If a drug epidemic broke out there, it could all but wipe the country out.

The US, particularly the liberal Dems are showing their colors by fighting against the death penalty, and allowing abortion to be legal, and euthenasia. It shows what value they put on life.

Michael medved interviewed Barbara Boxer the other day, I could only stomach about two minutes of it, in it she said, "...the pro choice people dont agree with the anti abortion people..." gotta love her propaganda techniques and how she refuses to respect the wishes of the pro life people to call them pro life. She uses those terms because she knows in the light of truth, abortion would be exposed as a trechorous barbaric act. EVIL.
 

Forum List

Back
Top