Old Rocks
Diamond Member
Make the economy even stronger, build renewables and grid scale storage.
Green jobs now employ 10x more people than fossil fuel
Green jobs now employ 10x more people than fossil fuel
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Make the economy even stronger, build renewables and grid scale storage.
Green jobs now employ 10x more people than fossil fuel
Make the economy even stronger, build renewables and grid scale storage.
Green jobs now employ 10x more people than fossil fuel
Lazard’s latest annual Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (LCOE 12.0) shows a continued decline in the cost of generating electricity from alternative energy technologies, especially utility-scale solar and wind. In some scenarios, alternative energy costs have decreased to the point that they are now at or below the marginal cost of conventional generation.(A) Claiming that "renewable energy" employs more people than some other form of energy generation is NOT A GOOD THING. Imagine saying that it takes twice as much manpower to build a car in England as it does in Japan. Not something for England to brag about, eh?
(2) Renewable energy is a virtue-signaling parlor game for rich Western countries, and has microscopic impact on the rest of the world, or - even if you believe the hysteria - the world's future climate. China - I read - has built enough new COAL energy infrastructure in the past two years to offset the entire world's painful cuts in CO2 output during that time. It doesn't even propose to reduce its CO2 emissions until about 2030. And don't forget, Chinese contractors are building coal-fired electric plants in Africa and elsewhere, in addition to its own domestic plants.
(iii) Embrace of nuclear power is the litmus test for seriousness about climate change. If you don't embrace Nuke, you are a dimwitted, uninformed jagg-off.
(d) Politicians "promising" 100% renewable energy decades after they are out of office? How much of a fool do you have to be to take this seriously?
V. For most of the world's population, COAL is the cheapest, easiest, most direct route to modernity available to them. But of course tofu-eating Leftists in the West don't really care if the people in rural China, India, Africa, and remote parts of South America have electricity, clean water, transportation, or - God forbid - AIR CONDITIONING. It's more important to them that they feel good about themselves for saving the fucking planet.
Carry on.
Perhaps is you were a little less lazy, you would have looked it up;Op...........what is the REAL COST per kwh of solar now..........because that is all that matters in the end.
And please don't go to the nifty not taking into consideration the cost of installation, and grid costs propaganda of the industry.
Cost per kwh including the installation and buying of the system is the ONLY THING THAT MATTERS.Lazard’s latest annual Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (LCOE 12.0) shows a continued decline in the cost of generating electricity from alternative energy technologies, especially utility-scale solar and wind. In some scenarios, alternative energy costs have decreased to the point that they are now at or below the marginal cost of conventional generation.(A) Claiming that "renewable energy" employs more people than some other form of energy generation is NOT A GOOD THING. Imagine saying that it takes twice as much manpower to build a car in England as it does in Japan. Not something for England to brag about, eh?
(2) Renewable energy is a virtue-signaling parlor game for rich Western countries, and has microscopic impact on the rest of the world, or - even if you believe the hysteria - the world's future climate. China - I read - has built enough new COAL energy infrastructure in the past two years to offset the entire world's painful cuts in CO2 output during that time. It doesn't even propose to reduce its CO2 emissions until about 2030. And don't forget, Chinese contractors are building coal-fired electric plants in Africa and elsewhere, in addition to its own domestic plants.
(iii) Embrace of nuclear power is the litmus test for seriousness about climate change. If you don't embrace Nuke, you are a dimwitted, uninformed jagg-off.
(d) Politicians "promising" 100% renewable energy decades after they are out of office? How much of a fool do you have to be to take this seriously?
V. For most of the world's population, COAL is the cheapest, easiest, most direct route to modernity available to them. But of course tofu-eating Leftists in the West don't really care if the people in rural China, India, Africa, and remote parts of South America have electricity, clean water, transportation, or - God forbid - AIR CONDITIONING. It's more important to them that they feel good about themselves for saving the fucking planet.
Carry on.
Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage 2018
Would you like to share more misinformation with us? Nuclear is way expensive. Coal requires railroad and a lot of other infrastructure, most of which is detrimental to the environment. Solar is very scalable, from powering a cell phone to a gigawatt power station. Solar is far more efficient, because it can be placed where the power is needed. Wind is presently cheapest, however, as the high efficiency solar is developed, that will change. The combination of solar and wind, with grid scale storage is capable of delivering 100% of the energy that we need.
Again, why so lazy, all of that is available if you look for it. But, just for you information;Cost per kwh including the installation and buying of the system is the ONLY THING THAT MATTERS.Lazard’s latest annual Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (LCOE 12.0) shows a continued decline in the cost of generating electricity from alternative energy technologies, especially utility-scale solar and wind. In some scenarios, alternative energy costs have decreased to the point that they are now at or below the marginal cost of conventional generation.(A) Claiming that "renewable energy" employs more people than some other form of energy generation is NOT A GOOD THING. Imagine saying that it takes twice as much manpower to build a car in England as it does in Japan. Not something for England to brag about, eh?
(2) Renewable energy is a virtue-signaling parlor game for rich Western countries, and has microscopic impact on the rest of the world, or - even if you believe the hysteria - the world's future climate. China - I read - has built enough new COAL energy infrastructure in the past two years to offset the entire world's painful cuts in CO2 output during that time. It doesn't even propose to reduce its CO2 emissions until about 2030. And don't forget, Chinese contractors are building coal-fired electric plants in Africa and elsewhere, in addition to its own domestic plants.
(iii) Embrace of nuclear power is the litmus test for seriousness about climate change. If you don't embrace Nuke, you are a dimwitted, uninformed jagg-off.
(d) Politicians "promising" 100% renewable energy decades after they are out of office? How much of a fool do you have to be to take this seriously?
V. For most of the world's population, COAL is the cheapest, easiest, most direct route to modernity available to them. But of course tofu-eating Leftists in the West don't really care if the people in rural China, India, Africa, and remote parts of South America have electricity, clean water, transportation, or - God forbid - AIR CONDITIONING. It's more important to them that they feel good about themselves for saving the fucking planet.
Carry on.
Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage 2018
Would you like to share more misinformation with us? Nuclear is way expensive. Coal requires railroad and a lot of other infrastructure, most of which is detrimental to the environment. Solar is very scalable, from powering a cell phone to a gigawatt power station. Solar is far more efficient, because it can be placed where the power is needed. Wind is presently cheapest, however, as the high efficiency solar is developed, that will change. The combination of solar and wind, with grid scale storage is capable of delivering 100% of the energy that we need.
What is that cost.........
Me and you have went round and round on this in the past.Again, why so lazy, all of that is available if you look for it. But, just for you information;Cost per kwh including the installation and buying of the system is the ONLY THING THAT MATTERS.Lazard’s latest annual Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis (LCOE 12.0) shows a continued decline in the cost of generating electricity from alternative energy technologies, especially utility-scale solar and wind. In some scenarios, alternative energy costs have decreased to the point that they are now at or below the marginal cost of conventional generation.(A) Claiming that "renewable energy" employs more people than some other form of energy generation is NOT A GOOD THING. Imagine saying that it takes twice as much manpower to build a car in England as it does in Japan. Not something for England to brag about, eh?
(2) Renewable energy is a virtue-signaling parlor game for rich Western countries, and has microscopic impact on the rest of the world, or - even if you believe the hysteria - the world's future climate. China - I read - has built enough new COAL energy infrastructure in the past two years to offset the entire world's painful cuts in CO2 output during that time. It doesn't even propose to reduce its CO2 emissions until about 2030. And don't forget, Chinese contractors are building coal-fired electric plants in Africa and elsewhere, in addition to its own domestic plants.
(iii) Embrace of nuclear power is the litmus test for seriousness about climate change. If you don't embrace Nuke, you are a dimwitted, uninformed jagg-off.
(d) Politicians "promising" 100% renewable energy decades after they are out of office? How much of a fool do you have to be to take this seriously?
V. For most of the world's population, COAL is the cheapest, easiest, most direct route to modernity available to them. But of course tofu-eating Leftists in the West don't really care if the people in rural China, India, Africa, and remote parts of South America have electricity, clean water, transportation, or - God forbid - AIR CONDITIONING. It's more important to them that they feel good about themselves for saving the fucking planet.
Carry on.
Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage 2018
Would you like to share more misinformation with us? Nuclear is way expensive. Coal requires railroad and a lot of other infrastructure, most of which is detrimental to the environment. Solar is very scalable, from powering a cell phone to a gigawatt power station. Solar is far more efficient, because it can be placed where the power is needed. Wind is presently cheapest, however, as the high efficiency solar is developed, that will change. The combination of solar and wind, with grid scale storage is capable of delivering 100% of the energy that we need.
What is that cost.........
https://www.lazard.com/media/450784/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-120-vfinal.pdf
In other words I asked for more than one source.In other words, you were too lazy even to look at the extensive information that Lazard provides on each of this issues. And all you do is flap yap, then say no one is providing information, when you make no attempt on your part to provide information.