Bob Blaylock
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #181
You believe she stole from him and wasn't just taking it away during school hours?
It was his rightful property, and she took it from him, by force.
How is that not stealing.
How is that not robbery?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You believe she stole from him and wasn't just taking it away during school hours?
RETARD ALERT as a teacher she is responsible for what goes on in the room and I assume that a switch and playing games is a BIG NO NO, it sure was when I went to school. She took it away and would have given it back after class. But then no one is accusing you of having any sense or brains.So why should it be the victim of an attempted robbery to be facing prison time, and not the perpetrator of that attempted robbery?
This teacher belongs in prison; and the young man whose rightful property she tried to steal from him by force, most certainly does not. At least not for this.
If she didn't want to get beaten up, then she should have kept her filthy thieving hands off of property that was not hers.
Ohh look retard disagrees that teachers have the right to take things away from kids in school.RETARD ALERT as a teacher she is responsible for what goes on in the room and I assume that a switch and playing games is a BIG NO NO, it sure was when I went to school. She took it away and would have given it back after class. But then no one is accusing you of having any sense or brains.
It was his rightful property, and she took it from him, by force.
How is that not stealing.
How is that not robbery?
He wasn’t robbed. The teacher removed a prohibited item. And because a white “oppressor” dared enforce the rules against him, the poor vulnerable victim beat her to a pulp, and continued his pummeling even though she was unconscious.He was robbed, by force.
How is that behavior, on the part of the teacher, acceptable?
And how does the victim of a robbery not have every right to fight back against it?
And how am I “crazy” for taking the side of a robbery victim, against that of the robber?
I’m pretty sure Blaylock is being sarcastic. He’s mocking the lib attitude.Because HE KEPT GOING AFTER HE SECURED HIS PROPERTY.
Blaylock, you're smarter than this.
The teacher, IF she did steal it needs to be punished in a court of law, not placed in a morgue.
It's a Nintendo, dude...just a Nintendo.....not really a life or death moment.
But, apparently you think different
Sooo ya think the best way to prevent crime is to kill the most innocent?sooo ya think with anti abortions laws and more bastards born...things will get better...do tell?
he is serious he negged my comment on the reason it was taken and he has repeatedly said he is serious.You're being sarcastic, right? You're not this stupid
I deleted my comment after I honestly thought he was mocking the left.he is serious he negged my comment on the reason it was taken and he has repeatedly said he is serious.
"Systemic racism"... lol.I can see the headlines now, he is really a nice kid, misunderstood, a victim of the system, would never hurt anyone.
.here yall are saying he needs to be done in...but yall are bringing this on yourselves
"Force"?So how is it all fixed? First elect desantis. Then after that fund police. Then force higher wages. Sounds possible.
And you're an idiot.I'm serious.
Assuming the story is as reported, the teacher committed robbery by force against the student.
If you think that this is in any way acceptable, and that the victim of this robbery was wrong for fighting back, then it is you who is one sick individual.
That teacher belongs in jail.
Perhaps it's a 'characteristic of the breed'.This is an event that is past tense, you understand what past tense is? I don't have to justify what is history since it already happened. I do suggest everyone learn self-defense to protect themselves. Policy? What policy makes people violent or it is the person themselves who are violent, maybe it was a possession by a demon or a revenge use by God, who knows?!
Very likely (bordering on certain) that all of the students in that school and their parents signed an agreement at the beginning of the school year pertaining to technology policies.I'm serious.
Assuming the story is as reported, the teacher committed robbery by force against the student.
If you think that this is in any way acceptable, and that the victim of this robbery was wrong for fighting back, then it is you who is one sick individual.
That teacher belongs in jail.
Definitely. It worked the last time: after Roe v Wade was enacted, the black crime spree happening then cleared up markedly: it's a well-known statistic.Sooo ya think the best way to prevent crime is to kill the most innocent?