Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope those people made sure to get out their on their own. Several of my co-workers went, and no billionaire even had to pay them! It's your imagination, you poor, frightened creepThey didn't even make their own signs. Total sham of a protest.75 kids for 20 minutes![]()
Yeah, well they spent their own money unlike your little "hero's" who had millions spent on them and their "protest". Sooooo, freedom loving kids vs billionaire supplied "useful idiots". I know who I support more.
Yes, I agree the 200,000 who marched on Washington were a sham. Paid for by billionaires who want to disarm the PEOPLE of the USA so they can finally control them and make them the peasants they want them to be.![]()
Cars kill multiples of more people than guns every year. Ban cars?
Actually, no they don't.
In fact, in 2015, more people died from guns than from cars.
Since 1980, the number of people killed by cars has been cut in half; that's thanks entirely to government action.
Cars kill multiples of more people than guns every year. Ban cars?
Actually, no they don't.
In fact, in 2015, more people died from guns than from cars.
Since 1980, the number of people killed by cars has been cut in half; that's thanks entirely to government action.
Proof?![]()
Proof?
The LV shooter fired for 7-10 minutes not 1.
1. After the first minute, most had taken cover or ran away.
2. Where were the good guys with guns since it wasn't a gun-free zone?
More lies, you can't take cover when you don't know where the bullets are coming from and hand guns aren't effective against a sniper who is firing long range.
My "imaginary military career"....So you admit to personal attacks as opposed to having to address the thread topic......conceding the point, eh?So...all you can do in rebuttal is attack a vet......gotcha![]()
No, I attacked you. Typical leftist, you think you speak for all vets. You're trying to put on the mantle of self victimization. Most veterans think you're a stupid piece of shit for your view you want to disarm honest citizens and let them be murdered by psycho shooters. You have blood dripping from your hands from a lot of people.
And you lied about being a vet. Man up
You still haven't explained what in your imaginary military career made you realize that honest citizens can't be trusted with guns and we should call the government and wait for them to defend us when they are done directing traffic.
So?Love the retirement check that "imaginary military career" nets me per month....paid for by your taxes.....
Feel free to continue to disrepect our vets....we knew it was only convenience for trumpanzees anyways.
I'm not talking about vets you stupid cvnt, I'm talking about YOU. Bodecea. You're dumb as a brick. I reject your cloak of martyrdom.
And you're a liar. If you were in the military, you'd know that conservatives in the military aren't defending a leftist, anti-gun veteran over a pro-military, pro-gun right civilian. Never gonna happen.
And you're still hiding, commander. I asked how you came to the conclusion using guns in your fake military experience lead you to that government should disarm honest citizens and make us all dependent on the government to protect us when they are done directing traffic. Man up, come out from under the bed, take off your dress and address the question
Proof?
From CDC, Deaths - Final Data for 2015, from November 27th, 2017:
Motor vehicle traffic deaths
Number of deaths: 36,161
Deaths per 100,000 population: 11.3
All firearm deaths
Number of deaths: 36,252
Deaths per 100,000 population: 11.3
You dumb fuck, more people are killed by distracted drivers than drunk drivers.
Yet both of those combined are still less than the number of people killed by guns. In fact, as recently as 2015 more people were killed by guns than by cars.
But you said even one incident was too many, now you're trying to walk that back when it's pointed out you own an instrument of death too..
Cars serve a purpose; transportation. That is their function. The only function a gun has is to maim and kill. Also, if you want to equate guns with cars, then perhaps we need to regulate guns like we regulate cars. But you oppose that, so your position is just to maintain the status quo because you're too intellectually deficient to come up with a solution or compromise...and it's that exact reason why I no longer support gun control and now support exclusively a ban on gun ownership.
Exactly what page is that on? It looks to me like they lump firearm and auto accidents together on page 66.
I guess the same applies with you and your money. It's your fault that criminal killed you for having money. GFY
Only if my money can go and kill dozens of people in under a minute...which it can't because it's, you know, money.
Fuck off maggot, I don't compromise when it comes to my rights.
Once again your dishonesty is apparent, you can only compare gun accidents to car accidents, intentional uses are another topic..
They use your money to buy that stolen gun asshole, don't deny your complicity.
Fuck off maggot, I don't compromise when it comes to my rights.
And this right here is the precise reason why I no longer support gun control and now only support a ban on gun ownership. Gun control won't work because gun control does nothing to force gun owners to be responsible for when their guns are lost and/or stolen, or when they sell their guns to shady characters because they need the money.
You can't even debate the merits of your fetish, instead ducking out of the debate like a fucking coward.
Once again your dishonesty is apparent, you can only compare gun accidents to car accidents, intentional uses are another topic..
If that's the case, then the number of people killed by cars is way way WAY less than those killed by guns. No one is killed accidentally by a gun because, according to you, guns are in the hands of "responsible gun owners" and no "responsible gun owner" would ever harm someone by accident with their gun, right? Unless...you're now saying that "responsible gun owners" do cause accidents with their guns.
Fuck off asshole, none of your crap applies to me or the vast majority of gun owners..
They use your money to buy that stolen gun asshole, don't deny your complicity.
Stolen from where? From a "responsible gun owner's" home or car. Most all stolen guns were once guns in the hands of "responsible gun owners" like you.
230,000 every year.
And only 86% of those are even reported to the police.
Which means about 32,000 guns every year disappear and no one is looking for them.
Which means 32,000 "responsible gun owners" don't even tell the cops that their guns went missing.
And again, the gun would be killing people, not my money.
Still denying your complicity I see, your money enabled the criminal.
, just like you claim my guns, which have never left my possession did
Like I said before, justice for people like you would be you getting beaten to death while you pray someone with a gun would come along and stop it. Remember, the police are only minutes away when seconds count.
Fuck off asshole, none of your crap applies to me or the vast majority of gun owners..
As of now. But you can't say that for certain, can you? By simply bringing a gun into your home, you are making the choice to give a criminal the opportunity to steal your gun from you...like what happens to 230,000 "responsible gun owners" every year.
They certainly are registered and controlled, tho.so if i steal your car and run people over, it's your fault.
No because guns aren't cars.
And are you saying you're going to steal a car and hurt people? Posts like those are warning flags that a "responsible gun owner" is about to act irresponsibly. In your crazy system of preventing people from getting guns, your post would be used against you when you tried to get one.
Cars kill multiples of more people than guns every year. Ban cars?