FLASHBACK: Two Obama-Era Officials Violated Hatch Act But Weren't Removed from Office

[Care4all]

IT'S THE LAW mud, Conway has repeatedly broken the law, even after being warned by our gvt, not to do it again.

She spit in the face of the law Mud.

Apparently the law only applies when you want it to.
You don't believe in applying the law to illegals.
The law only matters when you want it to.

I do believe in applying the law when it comes to illegals....

but this crisis we are going through now and for the past year or so, is a REFUGE crisis and NOT an illegal alien crisis

HORSESHIT!!!

The only reason those people are coming here is because they are being paid to come here by the left.
They aren't escaping religious persecution or political persecution....they are coming here to get paid.
Poverty isn't a qualification for asylum.

Under the Law, only the court judge can determine if they are here as legitimate refuges... when they cross the border, they are asylum seekers, and have the legal right to seek refugee status, no matter where or how they cross our border... the asylum seekers are not illegals until they have their day in court, turned down by the judge in the immigration court for refugee status, and cross the border a second time, after being denied by a court previously.... that is the law as it stands.

They have the right to apply for asylum......they don't have the right to stay.
They have to file an application.....many of which are rejected.
The problem is the fact that they are flooding our borders with so many that they cannot process them. They disappear after they're released and apply for benefits in Sanctuary cities.

pressing the EASY BUTTON would be staffing the immigration courts, from here to high heaven with immigration judges, to pass the asylum seekers through as quickly as possible and ankle bracelet monitors on the rest waiting their turn, imho.

 

[iceberg]

Apparently the law only applies when you want it to.
You don't believe in applying the law to illegals.
The law only matters when you want it to.

I do believe in applying the law when it comes to illegals....

but this crisis we are going through now and for the past year or so, is a REFUGE crisis and NOT an illegal alien crisis

HORSESHIT!!!

The only reason those people are coming here is because they are being paid to come here by the left.
They aren't escaping religious persecution or political persecution....they are coming here to get paid.
Poverty isn't a qualification for asylum.

Under the Law, only the court judge can determine if they are here as legitimate refuges... when they cross the border, they are asylum seekers, and have the legal right to seek refugee status, no matter where or how they cross our border... the asylum seekers are not illegals until they have their day in court, turned down by the judge in the immigration court for refugee status, and cross the border a second time, after being denied by a court previously.... that is the law as it stands.

They have the right to apply for asylum......they don't have the right to stay.
They have to file an application.....many of which are rejected.
The problem is the fact that they are flooding our borders with so many that they cannot process them. They disappear after they're released and apply for benefits in Sanctuary cities.

pressing the EASY BUTTON would be staffing the immigration courts, from here to high heaven with immigration judges, to pass the asylum seekers through as quickly as possible and ankle bracelet monitors on the rest waiting their turn, imho.

They do not qualify for asylum. They are just getting around laws so no wonder the left loves it.

 

[Care4all]

I do believe in applying the law when it comes to illegals....

but this crisis we are going through now and for the past year or so, is a REFUGE crisis and NOT an illegal alien crisis

HORSESHIT!!!

The only reason those people are coming here is because they are being paid to come here by the left.
They aren't escaping religious persecution or political persecution....they are coming here to get paid.
Poverty isn't a qualification for asylum.

Under the Law, only the court judge can determine if they are here as legitimate refuges... when they cross the border, they are asylum seekers, and have the legal right to seek refugee status, no matter where or how they cross our border... the asylum seekers are not illegals until they have their day in court, turned down by the judge in the immigration court for refugee status, and cross the border a second time, after being denied by a court previously.... that is the law as it stands.

They have the right to apply for asylum......they don't have the right to stay.
They have to file an application.....many of which are rejected.
The problem is the fact that they are flooding our borders with so many that they cannot process them. They disappear after they're released and apply for benefits in Sanctuary cities.

pressing the EASY BUTTON would be staffing the immigration courts, from here to high heaven with immigration judges, to pass the asylum seekers through as quickly as possible and ankle bracelet monitors on the rest waiting their turn, imho.

They do not qualify for asylum. They are just getting around laws so no wonder the left loves it.

you could not get a more lawless administration than the Trump administration... your snide remark about Democrats, the left, falls flat!

-----------------

YOU my dear, do NOT get to choose whether they qualify, or not for asylum.... so go and cry like a baby or shout from the roof top, or stomp your feet.... the Law is the Law, and a Judge in an immigration court, is who gets to decide whether they qualify for asylum.

Why do you think we are over flowing with asylum seekers, and having to release them due to such over flowing? Do you think the Trump admin wants to not just turn them away at the border? We have to give them their day in court, even if all of them were eventually denied refuge status, by a judge.

Time to staff those courts to the hilt, and move them through the system!

Changing the law, is a whole nuther story, and will never happen in an election year...shoot, it couldn't even happen when the Republicans owned the House, owned the Senate, and owned the Executive branch!

 

[mudwhistle]

HORSESHIT!!!

The only reason those people are coming here is because they are being paid to come here by the left.
They aren't escaping religious persecution or political persecution....they are coming here to get paid.
Poverty isn't a qualification for asylum.

Under the Law, only the court judge can determine if they are here as legitimate refuges... when they cross the border, they are asylum seekers, and have the legal right to seek refugee status, no matter where or how they cross our border... the asylum seekers are not illegals until they have their day in court, turned down by the judge in the immigration court for refugee status, and cross the border a second time, after being denied by a court previously.... that is the law as it stands.

They have the right to apply for asylum......they don't have the right to stay.
They have to file an application.....many of which are rejected.
The problem is the fact that they are flooding our borders with so many that they cannot process them. They disappear after they're released and apply for benefits in Sanctuary cities.

pressing the EASY BUTTON would be staffing the immigration courts, from here to high heaven with immigration judges, to pass the asylum seekers through as quickly as possible and ankle bracelet monitors on the rest waiting their turn, imho.

They do not qualify for asylum. They are just getting around laws so no wonder the left loves it.

you could not get a more lawless administration than the Trump administration... your snide remark about Democrats, the left, falls flat!

-----------------

YOU my dear, do NOT get to choose whether they qualify, or not for asylum.... so go and cry like a baby or shout from the roof top, or stomp your feet.... the Law is the Law, and a Judge in an immigration court, is who gets to decide whether they qualify for asylum.

Why do you think we are over flowing with asylum seekers, and having to release them due to such over flowing? Do you think the Trump admin wants to not just turn them away at the border? We have to give them their day in court, even if all of them were eventually denied refuge status, by a judge.

Time to staff those courts to the hilt, and move them through the system!

Changing the law, is a whole nuther story, and will never happen in an election year...shoot, it couldn't even happen when the Republicans owned the House, owned the Senate, and owned the Executive branch!

The only reason they came here is because leftists made promises to them that they could get around the law.
So everything that happens to them is on your heads.....because you support these criminals.

 

[iceberg]

HORSESHIT!!!

The only reason those people are coming here is because they are being paid to come here by the left.
They aren't escaping religious persecution or political persecution....they are coming here to get paid.
Poverty isn't a qualification for asylum.

Under the Law, only the court judge can determine if they are here as legitimate refuges... when they cross the border, they are asylum seekers, and have the legal right to seek refugee status, no matter where or how they cross our border... the asylum seekers are not illegals until they have their day in court, turned down by the judge in the immigration court for refugee status, and cross the border a second time, after being denied by a court previously.... that is the law as it stands.

They have the right to apply for asylum......they don't have the right to stay.
They have to file an application.....many of which are rejected.
The problem is the fact that they are flooding our borders with so many that they cannot process them. They disappear after they're released and apply for benefits in Sanctuary cities.

pressing the EASY BUTTON would be staffing the immigration courts, from here to high heaven with immigration judges, to pass the asylum seekers through as quickly as possible and ankle bracelet monitors on the rest waiting their turn, imho.

They do not qualify for asylum. They are just getting around laws so no wonder the left loves it.

you could not get a more lawless administration than the Trump administration... your snide remark about Democrats, the left, falls flat!

-----------------

YOU my dear, do NOT get to choose whether they qualify, or not for asylum.... so go and cry like a baby or shout from the roof top, or stomp your feet.... the Law is the Law, and a Judge in an immigration court, is who gets to decide whether they qualify for asylum.

Why do you think we are over flowing with asylum seekers, and having to release them due to such over flowing? Do you think the Trump admin wants to not just turn them away at the border? We have to give them their day in court, even if all of them were eventually denied refuge status, by a judge.

Time to staff those courts to the hilt, and move them through the system!

Changing the law, is a whole nuther story, and will never happen in an election year...shoot, it couldn't even happen when the Republicans owned the House, owned the Senate, and owned the Executive branch!

MY DEAR the laws for asylum are clear and I am not deciding a thing. But as usual you do the leftist shit where laws don't apply to your FEELZ.

 

[SAYIT]

So Republicans have no morals or values beyond what they imagine liberals are doing?

Inferring that they do have morals which is far more than anyone has ever said about leftards and for good reason.

 

[SAYIT]

Hmmm. Perhaps it's because where as these people apologized and didn't do it again. Conway has done it multiple times and wen't the complete opposite direction and mocked the Hatch Act and damn near admitted that she wouldn't stop doing the very thing that violates it.

Asking a political appointee not to be political is pure insanity. This is yet another stunt by the left.

Another leftarded mountain from a molehill. Their Rage du Jour. A hysterical hissy-fit. Sanctimonious hypocrisy of the bitter, Democrat Socialist order.

In a word: TRIGGERED.

Everything about the POTUS is a dinner bell to hate-filled Pavlov's dogs.

 

[mudwhistle]

Apparently the law only applies when you want it to.
You don't believe in applying the law to illegals.
The law only matters when you want it to.

I do believe in applying the law when it comes to illegals....

but this crisis we are going through now and for the past year or so, is a REFUGE crisis and NOT an illegal alien crisis

HORSESHIT!!!

The only reason those people are coming here is because they are being paid to come here by the left.
They aren't escaping religious persecution or political persecution....they are coming here to get paid.
Poverty isn't a qualification for asylum.

Under the Law, only the court judge can determine if they are here as legitimate refuges... when they cross the border, they are asylum seekers, and have the legal right to seek refugee status, no matter where or how they cross our border... the asylum seekers are not illegals until they have their day in court, turned down by the judge in the immigration court for refugee status, and cross the border a second time, after being denied by a court previously.... that is the law as it stands.

They have the right to apply for asylum......they don't have the right to stay.
They have to file an application.....many of which are rejected.
The problem is the fact that they are flooding our borders with so many that they cannot process them. They disappear after they're released and apply for benefits in Sanctuary cities.

pressing the EASY BUTTON would be staffing the immigration courts, from here to high heaven with immigration judges, to pass the asylum seekers through as quickly as possible and ankle bracelet monitors on the rest waiting their turn, imho.

When you have 100,000 of them coming thru per month.....where are you going to get all of the judges from?

 

[Serioususername]

Hmmm. Perhaps it's because where as these people apologized and didn't do it again. Conway has done it multiple times and wen't the complete opposite direction and mocked the Hatch Act and damn near admitted that she wouldn't stop doing the very thing that violates it.

Asking a political appointee not to be political is pure insanity. This is yet another stunt by the left.

Another leftarded mountain from a molehill. Their Rage du Jour. A hysterical hissy-fit. Sanctimonious hypocrisy of the bitter, Democrat Socialist order.

In a word: TRIGGERED.

Everything about the POTUS is a dinner bell to hate-filled Pavlov's dogs.

You've got a lot of fancy, useless words to excuse actions that shouldn't be excused. Someone is ignoring a rule, and flagrantly at that. It's not about the left or right, it's about Conway. The fact that you won't denounce her only shows your own political bias, because apparently if you're this Government Employee you should be able to flout law right in peoples faces without even being called on it.

Simply put, she's wrong, and she should be fired.

 

[Papageorgio]

Hmmm. Perhaps it's because where as these people apologized and didn't do it again. Conway has done it multiple times and wen't the complete opposite direction and mocked the Hatch Act and damn near admitted that she wouldn't stop doing the very thing that violates it.

Asking a political appointee not to be political is pure insanity. This is yet another stunt by the left.

Another leftarded mountain from a molehill. Their Rage du Jour. A hysterical hissy-fit. Sanctimonious hypocrisy of the bitter, Democrat Socialist order.

In a word: TRIGGERED.

Everything about the POTUS is a dinner bell to hate-filled Pavlov's dogs.

You've got a lot of fancy, useless words to excuse actions that shouldn't be excused. Someone is ignoring a rule, and flagrantly at that. It's not about the left or right, it's about Conway. The fact that you won't denounce her only shows your own political bias, because apparently if you're this Government Employee you should be able to flout law right in peoples faces without even being called on it.

Simply put, she's wrong, and she should be fired.

Never denounced those in the Obama administration that violated the Hatch Act, why do I need to now? Is this different?

 

[Serioususername]

Hmmm. Perhaps it's because where as these people apologized and didn't do it again. Conway has done it multiple times and wen't the complete opposite direction and mocked the Hatch Act and damn near admitted that she wouldn't stop doing the very thing that violates it.

Asking a political appointee not to be political is pure insanity. This is yet another stunt by the left.

Another leftarded mountain from a molehill. Their Rage du Jour. A hysterical hissy-fit. Sanctimonious hypocrisy of the bitter, Democrat Socialist order.

In a word: TRIGGERED.

Everything about the POTUS is a dinner bell to hate-filled Pavlov's dogs.

You've got a lot of fancy, useless words to excuse actions that shouldn't be excused. Someone is ignoring a rule, and flagrantly at that. It's not about the left or right, it's about Conway. The fact that you won't denounce her only shows your own political bias, because apparently if you're this Government Employee you should be able to flout law right in peoples faces without even being called on it.

Simply put, she's wrong, and she should be fired.

Never denounced those in the Obama administration that violated the Hatch Act, why do I need to now? Is this different?

Unless I'm missing something, Yes, very different. The examples presented here show that when those people violated the Hatch Act one time, they adjusted their behavior and apologized. Where as Conway has at least a handful of violations and doesn't seem to care at all, and has instead turned her chin up defiantly when she said. "tell me when the jail time starts". I'm paraphrasing, but that's more or less what she said isn't it?

 

[Papageorgio]

Hmmm. Perhaps it's because where as these people apologized and didn't do it again. Conway has done it multiple times and wen't the complete opposite direction and mocked the Hatch Act and damn near admitted that she wouldn't stop doing the very thing that violates it.

Asking a political appointee not to be political is pure insanity. This is yet another stunt by the left.

Another leftarded mountain from a molehill. Their Rage du Jour. A hysterical hissy-fit. Sanctimonious hypocrisy of the bitter, Democrat Socialist order.

In a word: TRIGGERED.

Everything about the POTUS is a dinner bell to hate-filled Pavlov's dogs.

You've got a lot of fancy, useless words to excuse actions that shouldn't be excused. Someone is ignoring a rule, and flagrantly at that. It's not about the left or right, it's about Conway. The fact that you won't denounce her only shows your own political bias, because apparently if you're this Government Employee you should be able to flout law right in peoples faces without even being called on it.

Simply put, she's wrong, and she should be fired.

Never denounced those in the Obama administration that violated the Hatch Act, why do I need to now? Is this different?

Unless I'm missing something, Yes, very different. The examples presented here show that when those people violated the Hatch Act one time, they adjusted their behavior and apologized. Where as Conway has at least a handful of violations and doesn't seem to care at all, and has instead turned her chin up defiantly when she said. "tell me when the jail time starts". I'm paraphrasing, but that's more or less what she said isn't it?

Okay, just can't get that excited over it. Pressure the President to fire her. I am more worried about us spending into oblivion no matter who the President is.

 

[SAYIT]

Asking a political appointee not to be political is pure insanity. This is yet another stunt by the left.

Another leftarded mountain from a molehill. Their Rage du Jour. A hysterical hissy-fit. Sanctimonious hypocrisy of the bitter, Democrat Socialist order.

In a word: TRIGGERED.

Everything about the POTUS is a dinner bell to hate-filled Pavlov's dogs.

You've got a lot of fancy, useless words to excuse actions that shouldn't be excused. Someone is ignoring a rule, and flagrantly at that. It's not about the left or right, it's about Conway. The fact that you won't denounce her only shows your own political bias, because apparently if you're this Government Employee you should be able to flout law right in peoples faces without even being called on it.

Simply put, she's wrong, and she should be fired.

Never denounced those in the Obama administration that violated the Hatch Act, why do I need to now? Is this different?

Unless I'm missing something, Yes, very different. The examples presented here show that when those people violated the Hatch Act one time, they adjusted their behavior and apologized. Where as Conway has at least a handful of violations and doesn't seem to care at all, and has instead turned her chin up defiantly when she said. "tell me when the jail time starts". I'm paraphrasing, but that's more or less what she said isn't it?

Okay, just can't get that excited over it. Pressure the President to fire her. I am more worried about us spending into oblivion no matter who the President is.

Shiny media baubles. Mountains out of molehills. Hell ... they spent a week chuckling about tissue stuck to Trump's shoe. I guess they need to keep their hateful, bitter, unhinged lemmings at DEFCON 2. Very sad.