When it comes to liberals, there is no disent allowed. You can not call yourself a liberal in the eyes of these bed wetters if you don't toe the line on every issue.
Are there any significant democrooks that easily hold office in moonbat districts that are pro-life? How about pro-2A? There may be a few blue dog democrooks that aren't dedicated to disarming the people and purging blacks from society through abortion, but they have tenuous grip on their offices. The small handful that voted against the last gun control scheme received death threats from their "tolerant" constituents.
Bed wetters like NYCarboner cannot comprehend that other people may not march in lock step with everyone else. Their desire to fit in overrides any instinct to think independently, and they're incapable of considering the possibility that someone can call themselves a libertarian, conservative, republican or anything they're programmed to hate and deviate from certain beliefs.
I'm a republican, (basically) though abortion IMO is a state issue. I don't like it, I think is the most heinous form of murder, but I wouldn't promote the feds getting involved. I think pot should be legal, not because I want society dumbed down and lethargic like elite moonbats do, but because it's worse to lock people up for it because not everyone who uses it is a lethargic oxygen thief.
Too a bed wetter I am still the enemy. Regardless of what I just said they'll insist I want gov't regulation of vaginas. I want the prisons full of black people. I hate (insert victim group here).
That's why I don't bother engaging these sniveling mindless drones. They're too stupid to waste the time on.
I applaud those of you who though.
The topic isn't about the libertarian parties platform. it's about libertarioanism. i realize this must come as a shock, but not all libertarians are in the party.
And you went right ahead and used more flawed reasoning to support your flawed reasoning. Does this circle ever end?
That's just a dodge so you people don't have to address the gaping flaws of logic, reason, and common sense that libertarianism represents.
You people are trying to tell us that libertarianism represents both pro-abortion and anti-abortion.
What the **** is that? That's like saying in my religion, it's both a sin and not a sin to steal.
lol. Are you trying to convince us that to be a Libertarian is to stand for nothing?
You quote two different posters (with no attribution on either of them I might add) in an effort to demonstrate the difference in opinion between them and then scoff at the idea of libertarian individualism, the defense rests your honor, the prosecution has made our case for us. Or were you perhaps attempting to practice some deception in your omission of attribution there and hoping nobody would notice those quotes came from two different people?
I don't have a side, I'm a student of philosophy not a player in "politics as a team sport", you can agree with my conclusions regarding philosophy or not, we can discuss them on condition that you are a thoughtful, rational individual (something which is still in doubt).
I'm not sure how you arrive at that conclusion given that I don't belong to or believe in political parties, I'm sure the details of your reasoning will be fascinating though.
Really? maybe you should go back and review what was said, who said it and the chronological order in which it was said.
I did not assert libertarian individualism ( I assumed that the individuality of individuals was self evident, apparently I was mistaken) nor do I have a "set of ideal policies", you're either engaged in projection or you're reading things that aren't there.
The topic isn't about the libertarian parties platform. it's about libertarioanism. i realize this must come as a shock, but not all libertarians are in the party.
And you went right ahead and used more flawed reasoning to support your flawed reasoning. Does this circle ever end?
That's just a dodge so you people don't have to address the gaping flaws of logic, reason, and common sense that libertarianism represents.
You people are trying to tell us that libertarianism represents both pro-abortion and anti-abortion.
What the **** is that? That's like saying in my religion, it's both a sin and not a sin to steal.
lol. Are you trying to convince us that to be a Libertarian is to stand for nothing?
Politic is is becoming a religion to many citizens these days be they Democrat or Republican.
That is why we have a Libertarian Party.
The topic isn't about the libertarian parties platform. it's about libertarioanism. i realize this must come as a shock, but not all libertarians are in the party.
And you went right ahead and used more flawed reasoning to support your flawed reasoning. Does this circle ever end?
That's just a dodge so you people don't have to address the gaping flaws of logic, reason, and common sense that libertarianism represents.
You people are trying to tell us that libertarianism represents both pro-abortion and anti-abortion.
What the **** is that? That's like saying in my religion, it's both a sin and not a sin to steal.
lol. Are you trying to convince us that to be a Libertarian is to stand for nothing?
No one said libertarianism respresents both of those. it's a personal issue best left to the individual involved. The doctor and patient. Libertarianism as one of it's main philosophical points, is that people are INDIVIDUALS.
I realize you come from the hive, where everyone buzzes on and on sasying the same shit and no dissent to any issue is allowed. We dont have that problem. We embrace individuals right to take responsibility for themselves and their decisions. Whether I like it or not or advocate it is entirely beside the point. it's not my decision to make, nor is it anyone elses, what some woman decides about abortion, or whether a doctor chooses to, or chooses not to perform it for their own INDIVIDUAL beliefs.
The fact you can not grasp this is of course, to no one's surprise here.
