They weren't obtained illegally. They followed the FISA warrant process.
Your brain is stuck on this idea it was based only based off the Steele dossier. That's ******* wrong. Page was under investigation as far back as 2013 because he didn't listen to the FBI's warnings.
Do you have any idea how rare it is that the FBI would actually warn an American citizen beforehand like this? Basically exposing that the Russian spies covers had been blown? Yet Page ignored that lifeline and even doubled down when he went to Russia and praised Russia and made anti-American statements.
... but then again Trump supporters suddenly like Russia and Putin now.
Moron.... you can't lie to get a FISA warrant and they lied to the Federal Judges..... they knew the steele dossier was created and paid for by the hilary campaign, and that the other "news" sources that they used to lie to the judges were leaks to those sources...from the Steele dossier... that is the circular intelligence that was the lie......
The FISA warrants were obtained by lying to federal judges..... you are a moron....and a doofus.
THEY DIDN'T GET THE FISA BASED OFF THE STEELE DOSSIER.
How many ******* times do you have to be told this? The dossier wasn't even created until 2016 and Page was under investigation as far back as 2013.
Moron... it states that they used the Steele Dossier as their primary source..... in the FISA application you twit.
No it doesn't. Show it. Page had already been under investigation, and the FBI just had to show there was progress made in the previous investigation in order to get another one.
Funny how you keep ignoring the obvious. The FBI TOLD PAGE THEY WERE RUSSIAN SPIES. He ******* continued to work with them. Use some common sense.
I'm really starting to think you are one of those Russian trolls. I find it hard to believe an American citizen would totally ignore and try discredit an investigation where Russia so clearly used spies ON U.S. SOIL, and that even after being warned, Page still worked with the RUSSIAN SPIES.
Seriously, why are you trying to defend that?