First They Attacked Charlie, Then They Attacked Erika, Now They're Attacking His Children!! 😡

So anybody who didn't agree with him is violent? You know that's crazy, right?
Yeah. But it's also true. Charlie said things that people hated, because they couldn't refute them.

That's why they murdered him. He was retaking the Gen Z kids, by showing them that they didn't suck, that their country was good, and that belief in God was ok.

He has won back a generation. That Marxists had been working on for years.

In the years to come, when the evil Marxists are defeated, it will be because of Charlie Kirk.
 
Yeah. But it's also true. Charlie said things that people hated, because they couldn't refute them.

That's why they murdered him. He was retaking the Gen Z kids, by showing them that they didn't suck, that their country was good, and that belief in God was ok.

He has won back a generation. That Marxists had been working on for years.

In the years to come, when the evil Marxists are defeated, it will be because of Charlie Kirk.
Just to be clear, do you really believe anyone who didn't agree with Kirk is violent?
 
Just to be clear, do you really believe anyone who didn't agree with Kirk is violent?
Disagree, no...but.. if you have to lie about what he said, anyone who disagrees with the simple beliefs that Charlie espoused, is at best a sociopath.

His simple statements weren't racist, or sexist, or anti scientific. They were based on well researched facts.

So anyone who accused him of racism, sexism, etc, was lying. Thus, by that factor alone they are violent.
 
If she puts herself out there as a controversial public figure, she has to take what comes with it.

In one fell swoop of blinding inverse-rationalization, you have just rationalized the killing of Charlie Kirk, MLK, JFK, John Lennon, the list is endless!

Better still, you've just /encouraged/ further violent intolerance and hyper-sensitization by the left, I mean, after all, all anyone has to say is that they had it coming because they dared stand out as an individual in society (the basis of capitalism) instead of staying in line and marching to the drum like a good little communist.
 
No but why must they be allowed to walk freely in society? They're constantly getting away with it because they can.
Dude, you obviously do not know who you are dealing with here. The democraps are masters of generating public opinion that destroys the right and makes the left look better in the voters' eyes. Look at what they did with George Floyd. Look at how they manipulated J6. Look at how they attack Trump and all their enemies. You seem hellbent on playing right into their schemes by asking for a heavy handed approach to their antagonistic attempts. You can't see that their narrative is already in place to paint the right as authoritarian fascists and they are desperately tying to spark violence against them so they can play the victim and use it to their advantage in the midterms? Dude, don't fall for democrap traps. Trump is smart enough not to, so trust him.
 
Disagree, no...but.. if you have to lie about what he said, anyone who disagrees with the simple beliefs that Charlie espoused, is at best a sociopath.

His simple statements weren't racist, or sexist, or anti scientific. They were based on well researched facts.

So anyone who accused him of racism, sexism, etc, was lying. Thus, by that factor alone they are violent.
Point out where I lied.
 
In one fell swoop of blinding inverse-rationalization, you have just rationalized the killing of Charlie Kirk, MLK, JFK, John Lennon, the list is endless!

Better still, you've just /encouraged/ further violent intolerance and hyper-sensitization by the left, I mean, after all, all anyone has to say is that they had it coming because they dared stand out as an individual in society (the basis of capitalism) instead of staying in line and marching to the drum like a good little communist.
You're nuts. I didn't rationalize the death of anybody. Are you hearing voices again?
 
If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024
If you’re a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022
Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023

If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024
If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023
 
Did you for one second think they would stop?

These are people who celebrate the murder of their enemies. You honestly thought they would draw the line at children?
"...celebrate the murder of their enemies." They were muslims???
 
15th post
If she puts herself out there as a controversial public figure, she has to take what comes with it.
What you really mean is that if someone says controversial stuff, he/she deserves whatever violence is coming to them.

Surely you know this is bad?

WTF are you talking about? One crazy guy shot Kirk. There was no they involved.
But you guys (those on the Left) either call that shooter a hero/applaud him, or otherwise glorify him. It all comes down to you people condoning the use of violence against those who you disagree with.
 
Last edited:
Nuthin' Fancy Post #35:

I can see why you would think Kirk was a racist, and based on the sort of things he said, he could indeed be considered one. But, if you are willing to put aside all the "OMG that's racist", everything he said is correct. A lot of black people get jobs that they otherwise would not have qualified for, due to AA/DEI. It is racist to point this out, yes, but it is still the truth nevertheless.
 
What you really mean is that if someone says controversial stuff, he/she deserves whatever violence is coming to them.

Surely you know this is bad?


But you guys (those on the Left) either call that shooter a hero/applaud him, or otherwise glorify him. It all comes down to you people condoning the use of violence against those who you disagree with.
Point out where I have done any of those things. Why should my opinion of his rhetoric be unchanged after his death.
 
Back
Top Bottom