Finally Stephen Witkoff and John Mearsheimer ADMIT Russia PROVOKED to Invade Ukraine

[pknopp]

I do? You'd think there would be a memo.

I can't remember the last time I listened to him.

If you didn't you would feel no need to defend him and call him out also for what he is, a convicted liar and understand why anything he says can not be taking as the truth for anything.

 

[White 6]

Is that right ?

Ukraine became independent in the early 1990s but Putin waited until 2014 to invade it?

Is it then a coincidence that Obama used $5 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBbillions from USAID to start the Maidan revolution in December 2013? Victoria Nuland has admitted that much.

Her telephone was tapped so most of her plans were exposed.

All of these facts were exposed by Oliver Stone's Documentary :

Ukraine on Fire (2016) ⭐ 6.3 | Documentary

1h 35m

www.imdb.com

Rebuilding to strength was not immediate, after the fall of the USSR.

 

[Contumacious]

And here we go again.

YOU MADE ME do it.

The excuse of rapists, wife beaters, murderers and terrorists.

Anything to protect Putin.

>>W H Y <<<<< did JFK blockade Cuba in 1962 ?!?!?!?!?

Splain Lucy

 

[hadit]

If you didn't you would feel no need to defend him and call him out also for what he is, a convicted liar and understand why anything he says can not be taking as the truth for anything.

I said two things in this thread, neither of which defend him. Care to find a real example?

 

[pknopp]

I said two things in this thread, neither of which defend him. Care to find a real example?

Tell us what you think of him then. Should the word of a convicted liar be used to support anything and is it not understandable for those who dismiss what he says as legit?

 

[Contumacious]

Rebuilding to strength was not immediate, after the fall of the USSR.

I see , so Putin was supposed to ignore the pleas from the breakaway Republics - East of the Dnipro River - which were populated by ethnic Russians who at the time were being subjected to a genocide ?

 

[Crepitus]

You're free to ignore him.

You're an idiot if you believe anything he says.

 

[hadit]

Tell us what you think of him then. Should the word of a convicted liar be used to support anything and is it not understandable for those who dismiss what he says as legit?

I don't think of him. Why is it incumbent on me to even have an opinion about him? I merely pointed out that you are free to ignore him, unless of course he got under your skin and you can't help talking about him. That just sounds a little creepy.

 

[hadit]

You're an idiot if you believe anything he says.

And you can't ignore him? He has no power over you, can't influence your life, but here you are, complaining about him.

 

[pknopp]

I don't think of him. Why is it incumbent on me to even have an opinion about him? I merely pointed out that you are free to ignore him, unless of course he got under your skin and you can't help talking about him. That just sounds a little creepy.

I also asked your opinion on others completely dismissing him because he is a convicted liar.

Absolutely legit.

Sadly MAGA still see's him as a valid source.

He is not.

 

[Crepitus]

And you can't ignore him? He has no power over you, can't influence your life, but here you are, complaining about him.

He convinces weak-minded people to believe things that are damaging to our country.

That makes him hard to ignore.

 

[otto105]

A tRump appointee and a long time Putin apologist?

Who gives a fuck, really?

They have to tout the russian propaganda.

 

[hadit]

He convinces weak-minded people to believe things that are damaging to our country.

That makes him hard to ignore.

IOW, he's a media figure, like a lot of other media figures who do the same thing.

 

[hadit]

I also asked your opinion on others completely dismissing him because he is a convicted liar.

Absolutely legit.

Sadly MAGA still see's him as a valid source.

He is not.

Okay, and we're all free to decide for ourselves if we agree with what he says or not, whether we pay attention to what he says or not.

 

[Crepitus]

IOW, he's a media figure, like a lot of other media figures who do the same thing.

No, he's a Russian propagandist. His whole reason for being is to convince weak-minded people to believe things that are bad for our country.

 

[hadit]

They have to tout the russian propaganda.

Glad that's not going on, that would be bad.

 

[pknopp]

Okay, and we're all free to decide for ourselves if we agree with what he says or not, whether we pay attention to what he says or not.

And you will take the word of a convicted liar as legit.

 

[hadit]

And you will take the word of a convicted liar as legit.

Example? And it has to demonstrate that I take his word for something, not that I simply say you can ignore him if you don't like what he says.

 

[otto105]

And you will take the word of a convicted liar as legit.

It par on the maga course.

 

[otto105]

Example?

Anything peter navarro says.