Finally, an Unbiased and Objective Climate Science Report

[Donald H]

You’re a true believer. You can’t support it. And you obviously can offer nothing to even properly discuss the report about which this thread focuses on

I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert. I will only rely on and believe the experts who are still saying that AGW and climate change concerns need to be addressed before there are catastrophic and very costly results.

Are you asking for some links to expert opinions?

Or are you still in denial?

 

[BackAgain]

How many genders are there?

No fair asking super complex questions!

 

[Donald H]

Here's the opinion of Judith Curry of the educated denialist side:

It’s warming. The warming is caused by us. Warming is dangerous. We need to urgently transition to renewable energy to stop the warming. Once we do that, sea-level rise will stop and the weather won’t be so extreme.

Judith made it much easier for those who aren't experts on the topic.

We now have both denialists and climate experts saying the same thing!

 

[BackAgain]

I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert. I will only rely on and believe the experts who are still saying that AGW and climate change concerns need to be addressed before there are catastrophic and very costly results.

Are you asking for some links to expert opinions?

Or are you still in denial?

I enjoy your evasion of the very point made by the OP.

Squirm harder.

Or, at least try to offer an actual rebuttal.

 

[Donald H]

No fair asking super complex questions!

Off topic but there are more than two genders.

​

There are more than two genders, as many cultures and societies recognize a variety of gender identities beyond the traditional male and female binary.

• Cultural Recognition: Various cultures throughout history have acknowledged nonbinary genders, with individuals often serving unique societal roles.
  
  1
• Diverse Identities: There are at least 72 recognized genders, including identities such as agender (genderless) and abimegender (deep and profound).
  
  1
• Scientific Perspective: Science supports the existence of multiple genders, challenging the notion that only two exist.
  
  1
• Western Constructs: Many Western gender identities are limited by binary thinking, while other cultures embrace a broader spectrum of gender.
  
  1
• Affirmation of Diversity: While the exact number of genders is not fixed, it is clear that there are definitely more than two.
  
  1
  This understanding reflects the evolving nature of gender identity in contemporary society.

And again the denialists find a reason to deny the facts brought to them by mainstream science.

 

[Donald H]

It has to be a 'god' thing with most of them.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

We only have thousands of years worth of uranium.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

No fair asking super complex questions!

Molecular Regulation of Sexual Preference Revealed by Genetic Studies of 5-HT in the Brain of Male Mice - PMC

To whom should a male directs his mating? While it is a critical social interaction, little is known about molecular and cellular mechanisms controlling mammalian sexual preference. Here we report that the neurotransmitter 5-HT is required for male ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[BackAgain]

Off topic but there are more than two genders.

It is kinda off topic other than to demonstrate the basic lack of scientific knowledge by those of you who still can’t grasp defer any meaningful rebuttal to the OP. And there are effectively only two sexes and two true genders.

And again the denialists find a reason to deny the facts brought to them by mainstream science.

And agin you fail to rebut the OP in any way.
The point remains that it is contested whether the alleged “consensus” of main stream science has even brought actual facts. Try reading the OP and the report.

You’ve got nothing. And it shows.

 

[Sunsettommy]

By "unbiased" you mean it's a report that aligns with your beliefs on the subject.

That's just a different type of bias... confirmation bias.

Meanwhile like Bulldog, Stuartbirdan2 and YOU have failed to once challenge the content of post one article thus you have nothing!

Thus, post one remains unchallenged as climate cultist morons doesn't know what is real and what is false to challenge it.

LOL

 

[Sunsettommy]

You sound triggered

You failed to make a rebuttal which is why you employ fallacies, smears and personal attacks because you have no idea what is really going in the world of science research.

You sound like a defeated climate cultist.

 

[hjmick]

Meanwhile like Bulldog, Stuartbirdan2 and YOU have failed to once challenge the content of post one article thus you have nothing!

Thus, post one remains unchallenged as climate cultist morons doesn't know what is real and what is false to challenge it.

LOL

Wow. I guess my post hit close to home.


Oh, and I'm no "climate cultist."

I'm just someone who points out the obvious. Like the fact that you seek articles and studies that confirm your bias. Something you do not challenge.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Molecular Regulation of Sexual Preference Revealed by Genetic Studies of 5-HT in the Brain of Male Mice - PMC

To whom should a male directs his mating? While it is a critical social interaction, little is known about molecular and cellular mechanisms controlling mammalian sexual preference. Here we report that the neurotransmitter 5-HT is required for male ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

LOL, you posted an off-topic deflection, how pathetic of you.

Keep it up as you show the world you have no cogent argument to make which is why Post one article CONTENT remains unchallenged.

I love the smell of YOUR failure all through this thread.

 

[BackAgain]

Wow. I guess my post hit close to home.


Oh, and I'm no "climate cultist."

I'm just someone who points out the obvious. Like the fact that you seek articles and studies that confirm your bias. Something you do not challenge.

Except, of course, you can’t support ^ that either.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Wow. I guess my post hit close to home.


Oh, and I'm no "climate cultist."

I'm just someone who points out the obvious. Like the fact that you seek articles and studies that confirm your bias. Something you do not challenge.

Where is your rebuttal to the CONTENT of post one article..... snicker........

You didn't point out anything obvious because you are avoiding commenting the article content while you are making the dumb confirmation bias argument that doesn't address anything thus you are batting zero.

 

[ReinyDays]

Meanwhile like Bulldog, Stuartbirdan2 and YOU have failed to once challenge the content of post one article thus you have nothing!

Thus, post one remains unchallenged as climate cultist morons doesn't know what is real and what is false to challenge it.

LOL

So it's safe for me to skip eight pages of back-and-forth? ...

Hits on all cylinders if you don't mind the carbon polluting reference ...

1] Data is freely available ... check it yourself ... there no change in intensity or frequency ... none ...
2] The extra carbon dioxide is good for plants ... there's equipment available on Amazon for ponds and aquariums to add CO2 ...
3] RCP8.5 is way, way over the line ... the forcing value is only 1.8 W/m^2 right now ... we'd have to burn everything to get 8.5 W/m^2 ...
4] "Because climate is the statistical property of weather over decades, single event attribution to climate change is not possible by definition"

Grand slam ...

 

[ding]

It’s an interglacial period. When the northern hemisphere deglaciates the oceans and the atmosphere warm.

 

[ding]

Scientific Consensus - NASA Science

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities

science.nasa.gov

It’s not a popularity contest. All this nonsense over AGW will end when the AMOC switches off.

 

[ding]

How do they explain the planet being 2C colder than the previous interglacial period?

 

[ding]

1. Share up-to-date facts about the price of wind and solar energy
For many decades, producing electricity from renewable sources was expensive. So it’s understandable that your colleagues and friends would express concern about the costs. You can make them aware that for utilities, the price of producing electricity from renewable sources has plunged dramatically, rewriting old assumptions about how to tackle the climate problem. In fact, between 2010 and 2019, the cost of offshore wind fell by 29%, onshore wind by 40%, and utility-scale solar photovoltaics by an astonishing 82%, according to the International Renewable Energy Association.

Are you driving an EV? Do you have solar panels on your house?