Last night, the Brown family attorney (whom I like) put forth a clever argument that the Grand Jury proceeding was tainted because the prosecutor did not submit recommended charges along with the evidence. This, of course, presupposes that the prosecutor had already determined that probable cause existed and was only seeking Grand Jury confirmation. In reality, the greater likelihood is that the prosecutor found no probable cause but didn't want to be accused of personal bias in this matter. The Grand Jury's vote will be interesting...