English Law And The Free Market

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,897
60,268
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. England 'seeded' colonies on this continent over a period of 125 years, from the year 1607. In the century prior to overseas expansion, the first free market or 'capitalist' society was instituted in that island nation.




2. At first consideration, it might be assumed that local, and long-range exchanges of goods by merchants are the mark of every known civilization. Not so.
Actually, at no time, "not in the ancient Mediterranean, the Middle East, China, India, pre-Columbian America, or medieval Europe- was an entire society organized by market exchange.

Likewise, although we associate the emergence of capitalism with cities such as Venice and Amsterdam and techniques such as joint-stock companies, banks, insurance, double-entry bookkeeping, and floating debts, such mercantilism involved small numbers of people dealing mostly in luxury goods. A true market society could only emerge in the countryside, where over nine out of ten people lived and earned their daily bread."
"Freedom Just Around the Corner: A New American History: 1585-1828,"byWalter A. McDougall, p. 18-19.




3. Just such an increasingly free rural market in land, labor, and basic commodities occurred in England. A major factor was the English Common Law tradition, unknown on the continent: Anglo-Saxons from northern Germany had carried over the tradition of resolving disputes by appeal to local customs, as interpreted by judges, using precedent and case law rather than laws imposed by distant, capricious rulers.

a. After 1066, the Norman kings introduced feudal law under the auspices of royal clerks, but left in placed the Common Law as described by Sir Henry Blackstone, as "the custom of the realm from time immemorial."

b. Edward I (the 'English Justinian') , enacted the Statutes of Westminster in 1275 and 1285, which made Common Law jury trials compulsory in criminal cases, and, among other things, and made land previously frozen under Frankish laws, to be legal tender for payment of court judgments.

4. Quia Emptoresis a statute passed in the reign of Edward I of England in 1290 that prevented tenants from alienating their lands to others by subinfeudation (the practice by which tenants, holding land under the king or other superior lord, carved out new and distinct tenures in their turn by sub-letting or alienating a part of their lands), instead requiring all tenants who wished to alienate their land to do so by substitution.
By effectively ending the practice of subinfeudation, Quia Emptores hastened the end of feudalism in England,...
Direct feudal obligations were increasingly being replaced by cash rents and outright sales of land which gave rise to the practice oflivery and maintenanceorbastard feudalism, the retention and control by the nobility of land, money, soldiers and servants via direct salaries, land sales and rent payments.
Quia Emptores - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


a. The result of Edward I reforms was that England now had a justice system based on contracts, adversarial jurisprudence, and traditional ideas of fairness and property rights that no king or bishop could sweep away.
And this was the tradition that the colonists expected to continue!

5. By restricting the jurisdiction of clerks to church law, Edward I created a secular profession of lawyers and judges.




6. The next step leading to a capitalist society was the fact that the kingdom of England had no internal barriers to trade, a major difference from other European realms: it was a ready-made national market for goods.
 
7. The distinct difference between the basis of the legal systems of England, and thus America, versus the rest of the European continent began on April 4, 527: Theodora and Justinian were crowned as empress and emperor.

8. In 528 Tribonian was selected, with John the Cappodocian, to prepare the new imperial legal code, the Codex Juris Civilis, or the Code of Justinian. Rome had a legal system dating back to the ‘Twelve Tables,’ written in 451 BCE, based on the 6th century BCE work of Solon of Athens.

9. In 530 a second commission led by Tribonian had the objective of revising the way lawyers were educated. Fifteen centuries later, the Codex still exerts its influence on Europe and is known as the Civil Law tradition. The Inquisition, Renaissance, the Napoleonic Code, and the Holocaust are all, in part, an outgrowth of the lex regia: “The will of the prince has the force of law.”( Quod principi placuit, legis haget vigorem) Today, European law gives preeminence to legislatures, the institution that drafted the statute prevails.




10. In Anglo-American Common Law tradition, the institution that interprets and adjudicates the statute has the final word. Due to the absence of a jury, and the deference to whomever writes the laws, Civil Law tradition is friendlier to tyrannical regimes than the Common Law tradition.
Under Justinians’ code the emperor is named nomos empsychos, “law incarnate.”
From "Justinian's Flea," by Wm. Rosen
 
11. From about 1000 to 1350, serfdom as a system was on the decline throughout Europe. This does not mean that England's feudal lords didn't still control much of the land, and this meant that they were getting richer, from things like the fees and shares of the harvests that the peasants had to pay.

a. They had this going for them: more than that of the rest of Europe, the English landed gentry was unusually cohesive...which explained why the barons were able to impose the Magna Carta on King John at Runnymede, in 1215.

12. There were 13 earls. Together with about 40 lesser barons, 21 bishops and a handful of others, they governed England. When the King summoned Parliament, they were the Lords, the aristocratic group, by contrast with the Commons, who were knights, gentry, and merchants.

a. An earl is a member of the nobility. The title is Anglo-Saxon, akin to the Scandinavian form jarl, and meant "chieftain", particularly a chieftain set to rule a territory in a king's stead. In Scandinavia, it became obsolete in the Middle Ages and was replaced with duke (hertig/hertug). In later medieval Britain, it became the equivalent of the continental count.
Earl - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


b. The hereditary peerage in the United Kingdom consists of dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts, barons, and baronets. Of these the following are still extent:

Dukes of: England: 11

Marquesses of England: 1

Earls ofEngland: 20

Viscounts of England: 1

Barons of England: 37

Baronets of the United Kingdom: 1,313
Are there still lords and earls in britain
 
13. The Bubonic Plague was a major factor in the changes that led to modern society.

" At first, the bacteria that became the plague lived quietly in the mammalian gut, and known as Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Small and innocuous, it could survive in a host causing little more than a stomachache. It had four thousand genes that that could move around, and could pick up bits of code from other bacteria, viruses, and even host DNA. More creative, bacteria have three ways of obtaining genes: conjugation, cell-to-cell contact; transduction, using viral infection to exchange genes; transformation, the process of gathering plasmisms, DNA floating in the bacterial environment. And, in addition, mutations.

a. At some point, the result of these processes was an entirely new re-shuffling of the bacterial DNA, thus a new organism, one that found a superior method of transportation from one host to another, known as a vector- a pathogen carrier: the flea.

b. Originally studied by Leeuwenhoek, the flea has legs that can propel it up to two feet, and hooks that can latch onto a host, and a mouth that can penetrate (the flea is a blood sucker) the host to carry the bacteria into the animal’s interior, the sine qua non or a successful vector.

c. It is interesting that the very young, who are generally hardest hit in epidemics, had a lower mortality than adults, simply because their small body size gave the fleas less of a target. And this reverberated in the rebound, during the ninth century and later, as all areas increased in population- but only western Europe tripled!
The clear winners of the post-plague population race spoke not Arabic, Greek or German- they spoke Latin."
From "Justinian's Flea," by Wm. Rosen
 
The plague, responsible for uncountable deaths....but it resulted in benefits to one particular continent.


14. Rosen (in "Justinian's Flea") goes on to explain the commensurate changes in society directly related to the Bubonic Plague:

As a result of the decimation of the population, the number of farmers was scarce, thus wages rose, causing an increase in population- one that could not feed itself without an increase in arable acreage.
As laborers increased in wealth, they could no longer be kept tied to the land, and, for the first time in a thousand years, were permitted to inherit, bequeath, or simply depart the land.


a. Around 600, plows appeared which resulted in the increased value of horse, which intern obliged the planting of oats.
The two-field system gave way to the three-field rotation (wheat/rye, oats/barley, one fallow) this increased efficiency by 50%.
Now livestock could be raised. Surplus food and livestock drew wolves and raiders. Warriors were needed to protect the farmers, and over time, improved offensive and defensive weaponry.

b. The “stirrup and plow” determined the path of modern Europe. Great forest-clearing projects followed the plague years, opening enough land to make possible the European population explosion, not an option in the deserts of Mesopotamia or the built up lands of the Mediterranean.
This was Europe’s topographic advantage: the great forests. Power flowed North to the land of Frankish kings.
 
15. After 1348, things were very different: the plague had produced a severe labor shortage, and this dimmed any hopes of reestablishing serfdom.
Peasants simply fled.


Plus, the nobility fell into a series of civil wars in the 1400s over royal succession. Slowly, lords began to use the only thing they had left, the land, in a way we begin to recognize: they enclosed the land, and gave it to farmers under competitive leases and rents.

The farmers used the system as well, with the most productive and hard working farmers able to bargain for lower rents, longer leases....or offer higher rents than other farmers could afford, and thereby acquire their neighbor's lands.

a. The value of more efficient husbandry, cost-cutting, specialization became evident.

b. As the new techniques spread, both the lords and the farmers saw the need, and had the incentives, not just to sit back and collect the dues provided by law and custom, but to expand and improve as much acreage as could be salvaged from swamp, moor, and commons.

A whole society began to move from a system based on communal rights and responsibilities to one based on property rights and contracts.
Robert Brenner, " The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism," pp. 213-328





So...perhaps not a 'perfect storm,' but a storm all the same, produced the freedom of the free market.

Can you see Wal-Mart around that corner?
 

Forum List

Back
Top