Femto camera experiment says space is the medium for light

[Grumblenuts]

You said the crust is like a blanket for the heat, last time i checked blankets are not only capable of but there sole purpose is to trap heat below?

If so, I meant the crust slows the heat loss like a blanket keeps one warmer in bed than having none all night.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

then NUts.... the decay of isotopes isn't a perfect system, yet the heat is perfectly distributed at all times through the earth. How do you explain the fact that the radioactive decay causes perfect even distribution of the heat?

 

[Grumblenuts]

then NUts.... the decay of isotopes isn't a perfect system, yet the heat is perfectly distributed at all times through the earth. How do you explain the fact that the radioactive decay causes perfect even distribution of the heat?

Which isotopes? What's a perfect system? Where did you get this idea that "the heat is perfectly distributed at all times through the earth."? Explaining what you imagine is not within my powers.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

This from physics stack exchange: "The densest elements (metals) in the Earth fall to the center, due to the gravitational force. The densest elements are radioactive, Earths core is radioactive, Uranium-238 is one radioactive species at the center of the earth."
So the heavier elements fall through the earth? at what rate? it would have to be a perfectly continuous rate or else the core temperature would vary. So what controls the rate at which these heavy elements sink? Why don't they all sink at once?

 

[Grumblenuts]

This from physics stack exchange: "The densest elements (metals) in the Earth fall to the center, due to the gravitational force. The densest elements are radioactive, Earths core is radioactive, Uranium-238 is one radioactive species at the center of the earth."
So the heavier elements fall through the earth? at what rate? it would have to be a perfectly continuous rate or else the core temperature would vary. So what controls the rate at which these heavy elements sink? Why don't they all sink at once?

Yeah, all sorts of conflicting noises out there from students and know-it-alls. They'll point all around and yabber just about anything, then the opposite. Best to stick with sources that consistently make sense.. like NASA.

I don't believe the proportion of radioactive elements at the core is significant. There seems to be more within the crust and they likely don't produce much heat anyway. Perhaps the core is just gradually cooling, but I believe some elements lighter than iron must still be undergoing fission there due to the heat and crushing pressure.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Slow news day? Here's a bit of light reading from Ken Wheeler's Definitions file:

GRAVITY

Gravity is not a unique or autonomous field modality whatsoever. The very same phenomena humans call electrostatic cling, and so-called “magnetic attraction” (which is not magnetism at all) is the very same phenomenon we call gravity. Furthermore objects do not accelerate towards one another as is perceptually witnessed rather they accelerate towards the lowest null pressure point between the two. The same is likewise the case for inverse polarity magnets where it is seen under the supercell that a portal in counterspace is generated between the two which the magnets are moving towards it, not themselves, but rather this null point. Said magnets also can be seen to have a sphere between them as they accelerate which is shrinking proportionally. This is the ‘deflation’ of the torus of force and motion, i.e.. magnetism itself.

The difference between so-called gravity and so-called magnetic attraction is that in the case of the magnets, they are multiplicative point-source objects accelerating, so the intensity is many magnitudes greater than that of common objects accelerating towards the null point in counterspace; mere masses of the conventional kind are point non-specific or incoherent objects.

Gravity does not exist, gravity is not a force at all, the phenomena humans call gravity is simplex dielectric mutual mass acceleration. The reason every brand of current science is self-confessed to be utterly confused and perplexed by what gravity is, is because they’re Atomists looking for answers in all the wrong places and have reified insane notions of “warped space time” to superficially explain this phenomenon, however they never will. The sublime portion of their futile search for understanding of the ‘gravity field’ is that gravity is quite literally an anti-field, the erasure of space, that being the attribute of a divergent magnetic field. All of nature follows after pressure mediation, and the phenomena called gravity is mere dielectric acceleration, plane and simple.

Read once per month for the next three years and it may begin to sink in..

By "multiplicative point-source objects" Ken is referring to the fact that a bar magnet, for example, may be divided and divided again, but no matter how many pieces result each will be another pole magnet with the same orientation bisected by a brand spanking new "plane of inertia."

the boundary between so-called “magnetic poles” and the center of which is counterspace where no magnetism can be measured at all.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

R. D. Oldham's identification of P and S waves in seismological records allowed him to detect a discontinuity corresponding to a boundary between core and shell (mantle) in 1906, and Beno Gutenberg established the depth of this boundary as 2900 km.

 

[Grumblenuts]

 

[trevorjohnson83]

hmm... another presumption, if like I was saying the pressure in the core creates an extending gravity field, it might also create earth's magnetic field, and attribute to some of the heat. I was pondering when and where atom's were without electromagnetic shells, that they were ever at some point without them and had to create them. I see now since the core pressure of the nuclei creates its shell, that the nuclei must be composed of smaller and smaller divsions of the same thing, a nuclei with a electromagnetic shell, and when pressured in the core the magnetic field 'blooms' out of the atom.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Since the spin of the earth appears to control the North and south poles, I would think at the atomic level, the nucleus spins slightly on an axis of north and south as well. Planet's have all different magnetic fields they say.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

If the electromagnetic field originates its poles from the spin of the nucleus, perhaps in a magnetic material this spin energy of the nucleus is converted to a slight oscillation between the atom's. When an atom vibrates from heat it's attempting to spin faster. I guess magnetic poles can be thought of as equilibrium in and equilibrium out. Perhaps creating a liquid out of a steam converts spinning into a sudden vibration state of the nucleus and an electrical discharge occurs? That would be interesting to test with different substances changing the STP to cause phase changes.

 

[Grumblenuts]

if like I was saying the pressure in the core creates an extending gravity field,

Since the spin of the earth appears to control the North and south poles,

If the electromagnetic field originates its poles from the spin of the nucleus,

How about presuming gravity causes "the pressure in the core" to begin with? How about presuming "the spin of the earth appears" not to control North and South?

Earth’s magnetic north and south poles swap locations. While that may sound like a big deal, pole reversals are common in Earth’s geologic history.

How about presuming fields (or anti-fields like gravity) to be the cause (or what "originates") everything? The Aether being the fundamental field manifesting all the others?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

The influence of gravity seems related to core pressure heat attracting two objects, the core pressure heat increases when the two object's meet, the attraction of gravity may be a response of core pressure heat converting an increase in temperature into movement of the two object's towards each other.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

How about presuming gravity causes "the pressure in the core" to begin with? How about presuming "the spin of the earth appears" not to control North and South?

How about presuming fields (or anti-fields like gravity) to be the cause (or what "originates") everything? The Aether being the fundamental field manifesting all the others?

Nuts I'm trying to fine tune the ins and outs of these ideas, not dismiss them all together. So excuse me if they are hard to read!

 

[Grumblenuts]

Nuts I'm trying to fine tune the ins and outs of these ideas, not dismiss them all together. So excuse me if they are hard to read!

Seems to me, things that make absolutely no sense beg for immediate dismissal, foremost and forever. Ejected with a vengeance. Relegated to the proverbial dustbin. Done. Kaput. Stress reduced, if not eliminated. Life is short. KISS.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Seems to me, things that make absolutely no sense beg for immediate dismissal, foremost and forever. Ejected with a vengeance. Relegated to the proverbial dustbin. Done. Kaput. Stress reduced, if not eliminated. Life is short. KISS.

I don't know Nuts a whole bunch of these ideas are about a day old so forgive me if you pain to read them.

 

[Grumblenuts]

I always forgive you. No worries.

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Here ya go Nuts! another idea to drive you......well nuts.

When atom's are locked in a solid state they don't spin but vibrate, adding heat causes them to want to spin faster which increases the size of the extending electromagnetic field. The shape of the nucleus determines how atoms line up with each other and conducting properties are determined by the amount of mobility the atom's have between each other.

 

[Grumblenuts]

locked in a solid state they don't spin

adding heat causes them to want to spin faster

?

conducting properties are determined by the amount of mobility the atom's have between each other.

Say copper vs. glass, for example..?

 

[trevorjohnson83]

Say copper vs. glass, for example..?

At room temperature, glass does not have any free electrons to move the electric charge, so it acts as an insulator. However, it becomes a conductor when heated to a high temperature. At room temperature, there are no delocalized electrons in glass to conduct electricity.

glass's main ingredient is silica which is silicon with two oxygen atom's. The molecules in glass when its a solid and heat is applied would also want to spin faster. I would have to suggest that the boundary between the molecule's in an insulator doesn't allow the heat to conduct because the molecule's are less free to vibrate. Why? could be a tighter connection between them.