Educated Eunuchs
Dr. Trevor,
I don't use electron's to describe anything so...
not a great technical physics writer so don't know off hand. kind of a jeopardy question.
You don't believe my theory of gravity? I don't know what to say anymore. I can't refine that theory any more then I have at the present moment. I'll clarify it one more time. When the gravity field of one nuclei crosses into the gravity field of another nuclei, the density/temperature of the edge of one gravity field is going to be compressed by the higher temperature/density of the other nuclei's inner gravity field. When the two gravity field's compress each other they pull the atom's together.
Ya did here:
Same singular possessive form instead of the plural no less..
Still allowed to use a search engine?
I figured you could just pick one, but..Informally, it is the amount of heat that must be added to one unit of mass of the substance in order to cause an increase of one unit in temperature. The SI unit of specific heat capacity is joule per kelvin per kilogram, J⋅kg−1⋅K−1.[1] For example, the heat required to raise the temperature of 1 kg of water by 1 K is 4184 joules, so the specific heat capacity of water is 4184 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1.[2]
Specific heat capacity often varies with temperature, and is different for each state of matter. Liquid water has one of the highest specific heat capacities among common substances, about 4184 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1 at 20 °C; but that of ice, just below 0 °C, is only 2093 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1. The specific heat capacities of iron, granite, and hydrogen gas are about 449 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1, 790 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1, and 14300 J⋅kg−1⋅K−1, respectively.[3] While the substance is undergoing a phase transition, such as melting or boiling, its specific heat capacity is technically undefined, because the heat goes into changing its state rather than raising its temperature.
The specific heat capacity of a substance, especially a gas, may be significantly higher when it is allowed to expand as it is heated (specific heat capacity at constant pressure) than when it is heated in a closed vessel that prevents expansion (specific heat capacity at constant volume). These two values are usually denoted by {\displaystyle c_{p}}and {\displaystyle c_{V}}
, respectively; their quotient {\displaystyle \gamma =c_{p}/c_{V}}
is the heat capacity ratio.
The term specific heat may also refer to the ratio between the specific heat capacities of a substance at a given temperature and of a reference substance at a reference temperature, such as water at 15 °C;[4] much in the fashion of specific gravity. Specific heat capacity is also related to other intensive measures of heat capacity with other denominators. If the amount of substance is measured as a number of moles, one gets the molar heat capacity instead, whose SI unit is joule per kelvin per mole, J⋅mol−1⋅K−1. If the amount is taken to be the volume of the sample (as is sometimes done in engineering), one gets the volumetric heat capacity, whose SI unit is joule per kelvin per cubic meter, J⋅m−3⋅K−1.
One of the first scientists to use the concept was Joseph Black, an 18th-century medical doctor and professor of medicine at Glasgow University. He measured the specific heat capacities of many substances, using the term capacity for heat.[5]
Just asking.. for clarification.. I mean, I can sometimes just sit and stare at a phrase like:
in wonder.. self? self? why? Sir? Dr. Nuts? knock, knock?.. why are you just sitting here stuck like this?.. staring?.. attempting to unravel that?..
Lord, hep me!.. Hep me please, oh Lord!..
If you were a hundred scientists nut's and all of you signed a petition against me I would simply respond 'why the need for all of you? The work of one man vs 100 is the same as voting for your favorite thing, it only takes one man to enjoy his favorite thing, no need for a hundred men talking all at once, who would even decipher that? and 100 men make no sense if one says a word then the next one until they make something up that is suppose to be a point against me? You and the other 99 of you can't just say a bunch of things are wrong when one of you is enough to slowly list them off. As for the large number in a group, this by consensus is not the way to prove a person wrong, and if you were to show up on my lawn I'd be ready with the hose. Show you what one man can do vs one one hundred.' them there would be my regards.
My point is when you gather 100 signatures for a petition, its like saying one guy signed it, but with 100 DIFFERENT guys, so they're the same thing. So when your pointing out something that's wrong with what I'm saying, the answer is there are too many of you and YOU are wrong, unless there is just one of you like me which is partially correct.
socratic.org
www.ralphnaderradiohour.com
-or- thermal conductivity describes the ability of a material to conduct heat, and the specific heat capacity of a given material tells how much heat energy is absorbed or released depending on the temperature difference and mass. Much confusion clearly persists in this area. Paying attention to the units involved in each term can only help. Keep in mind that you're currently exploring only one of the three kinds of heat transfer. Specifically "conduction":
Its a slow process my friend, learning, like yesterday I asked and got answers to about 15 questions. In the past 12 years since I started looking into these things outside school. There have been hundreds of times that I fill my browser with tabs of research in a day, researching all day. I might stumble around applying the aether to ideas I've just learned a little more, but I think I'm learning from doing that as well, might be smarter to let things sit a while before posting them so people aren't constantly leaning back and forth with me.
