Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have to kill these women. We have to. Its an emergency. Either that, or life sentence. We must stop letting these Charles mansion, proxy murders get away.
200 years ago women were EQUAL. They thought nothing of executing evil women.
we need to grow a pair and reinstate consequences for women in our society.
200 years ago women were EQUAL. They thought nothing of executing evil women.
we need to grow a pair and reinstate consequences for women in our society.
Alternatively, RWNJs could just mind their own fucking business.
novasteve - How many times have you been pregnant? How many unwanted kids are you supporting? You silly as twit. MYOB
Did you miss the part about being members of the communist party?
200 years ago women were EQUAL. They thought nothing of executing evil women.
we need to grow a pair and reinstate consequences for women in our society.
Alternatively, RWNJs could just mind their own fucking business.
novasteve - How many times have you been pregnant? How many unwanted kids are you supporting? You silly as twit. MYOB
So you support this? By the way I'm a woman, been pregnant and now have three adopted children. How many unwanted are you supporting? I don't mean through charity I mean hands on, raising them
200 years ago women were EQUAL. They thought nothing of executing evil women.
we need to grow a pair and reinstate consequences for women in our society.
Alternatively, RWNJs could just mind their own fucking business.
novasteve - How many times have you been pregnant? How many unwanted kids are you supporting? You silly as twit. MYOB
So you support this? By the way I'm a woman, been pregnant and now have three adopted children. How many unwanted are you supporting? I don't mean through charity I mean hands on, raising them
Yes.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe you.
Sorry bi-catfish but you've lied so often, even your fellow RWNJs know you're lying.
And I never ever ever ever EVER answer personal questions. If YOU had followed that rule, the board wouldn't know the truth about you. Think about it.
This fails as a straw man fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, and false comparison fallacy.
Dear liberal cocksucker: They are advocating abortion as birth control UP TO THE MOMENT OF BIRTH. If you can't see something wrong with that, you are a sociopath.200 years ago women were EQUAL. They thought nothing of executing evil women.
we need to grow a pair and reinstate consequences for women in our society.
Alternatively, RWNJs could just mind their own fucking business.
novasteve - How many times have you been pregnant? How many unwanted kids are you supporting? You silly as twit. MYOB
Are you illiterate? Look at the fucking title "Feminists in the UK..." Can you read?This fails as a straw man fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, and false comparison fallacy.
The story is from the UK, not the United States – false comparison.
Those advocating for the end of the time-limit restrictions are a non-representative minority, in no way ‘speaking for’ all ‘feminists’ – hasty generalization.
No one in the United States advocates for abortion being ‘legal’ up to just before birth – Straw man.
Liberals are ghouls. What do you expect?
The newborn and the fetus are morally equivalent
The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.
Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’. We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her. This means that many non-human animals and mentally retarded human individuals are persons, but that all the individuals who are not in the condition of attributing any value to their own existence are not persons. Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life. Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life: spare embryos where research on embryo stem cells is permitted, fetuses where abortion is permitted, criminals where capital punishment is legal.
Our point here is that, although it is hard to exactly determine when a subject starts or ceases to be a ‘person’, a necessary condition for a subject to have a right to X is that she is harmed by a decision to deprive her of X. There are many ways in which an individual can be harmed, and not all of them require that she values or is even aware of what she is deprived of. A person might be ‘harmed’ when someone steals from her the winning lottery ticket even if she will never find out that her ticket was the winning one. Or a person might be ‘harmed’ if something were done to her at the stage of fetus which affects for the worse her quality of life as a person (eg, her mother took drugs during pregnancy), even if she is not aware of it. However, in such cases we are talking about a person who is at least in the condition to value the different situation she would have found herself in if she had not been harmed. And such a condition depends on the level of her mental development,6 which in turn determines whether or not she is a ‘person’.
Now that isn't a very christian-like thing to say, is it? Oh that's right, you're one of those hypocrite christians, nevermind.200 years ago women were EQUAL. They thought nothing of executing evil women.
we need to grow a pair and reinstate consequences for women in our society.
Alternatively, RWNJs could just mind their own fucking business.
novasteve - How many times have you been pregnant? How many unwanted kids are you supporting? You silly as twit. MYOB
So you support this? By the way I'm a woman, been pregnant and now have three adopted children. How many unwanted are you supporting? I don't mean through charity I mean hands on, raising them
Yes.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe you.
I don't believe you.
Sorry bi-catfish but you've lied so often, even your fellow RWNJs know you're lying.
And I never ever ever ever EVER answer personal questions. If YOU had followed that rule, the board wouldn't know the truth about you. Think about it.
it doesn't matter if you believe me, fuck wit. You sit and demand others take care of things and sit on your god damn lazy ass and do nothing.
You don't know me lard ass, you were duped by some old hag, but of course you're a fuckwitted liberal and easily duped. So save your allegations, hag, NOBODY believes YOU....now get back on topic, bitch