Federal Judge Stops trump's Plan To Use 3.6 Billion Military Dollars On Wall

[rightwinger]

Doesn’t matter anyway

Dems will tear down the wall once Trump is gone anyway
Just like Germany tore down the wall once the communists were gone

 

[g5000]

Doesn’t matter anyway

Dems will tear down the wall once Trump is gone anyway
Just like Germany tore down the wall once the communists were gone

They won't tear it down. Drug smugglers are already cutting it down.

America needs its drugs, baby!

 

[pknopp]

FYI, it has been
11 months of Dems having power in the house, as of this month, with no power in the Senate....

What have they accomplished? A failed coop? I do appreciate it though. Y'all are gonna give Trump the power next year to be able to make roe vs wade a bad memory. Thanks to Pelosi and Schiff, I will send them a thank you note!

If you overturn RvW all that does is send it back to the States. States that want to make late term abortions legal can again.

Not if they declare a fetus, a living human.

It will return the decision back to the states. Period.

No if a fetus is ruled a living human, abortion becomes murder. As it should and if it happens, liberals can think themselves for it.

It's not going to happen. This is what people have been saying is going to happen for 45 years now. Doesn't getting nothing ever grow old?

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Texas land owners have yet begun to fight - JUST LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

I already schooled you on this previously. It's called eminent domain. It's part of the Fifth Amendment. Government need only pay just compensation to land owners for government appropriation of private land. The "fight" is conducted as a civil matter over the value paid in an eminent domain case, not as an injunction against the appropriation. Read the Fifth Amendment sometime.

and the old woman in NY tied up Trumps imminent domain suit for over 20 years in the courts

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines.[4] Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000,[5] a quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

With the assistance of the Institute for Justice, Coking fought the local authorities and eventually prevailed.[6] Superior Court Judge Richard Williams ruled that because there were "no limits" on what Trump could do with the property, the plan to take Coking's property did not meet the test of law. But Williams' ruling did not reject the practice of using eminent domain to take private property from one individual and transferring it to another, which would eventually be upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kelo v. City of New London.

Two other properties that prevailed against eminent domain eventually did sell: Sabatini's restaurant received $2.1 million and a pawnshop sold for $1.6 million. Their lots became part of a large lawn flanking a taxi stand for Trump's casino.[1][7] Coking remained in her house until 2010, when she moved to a retirement home in the San Francisco Bay Area near her daughter and grandchildren.

Property records show that on June 2, 2010, Coking transferred ownership of the house to her daughter, who put it on the market in 2011 with an initial asking price of $5 million.[1][8] By September 2013 the price had been reduced to $1 million.[9]

The property was finally sold for $583,000 in an auction on July 31, 2014.[10] The buyer was Carl Icahn, who held the debt on Trump Entertainment, owner of Trump Plaza. He subsequently demolished the house on November 19, 2014.[11] Neither the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority nor the owners of Trump Plaza expressed any interest in the auction.[1]

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

And what does that have to do with the power of eminent domain by the government for the purposes of the border wall construction??

You do realize the example you listed pertained to an issue of first-impression--whether the power of eminent domain allowed the government to appropriate property of one private owner and transfer it to another private owner--right? And that ruling was later upheld by SCOTUS in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

The eminent domain issue here has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is appropriation by the government for government use. It is well-established law, and would involve a determination of fair compensation.

I'm certain you don't know anything about the issue you found in that article or its implications here, given that you've referred to this as "imminent" domain

it means I just educated you about ED.

YA MORON -

Is that your honest take away from this? LOL. You cite an article you found on Google about an issue that has nothing to do with eminent domain for government use, I nail you down on how it's not only a different issue altogether, but the delay in the appeals process over the issue in that case was later upheld by the US Supreme Court (making it controlling precedent), and you still think you scored a point? You really are some kind of stupid my friend.

I quote ED history with TRUMP as a main player, and it has nothing to do with ED ?

told you about lofty goals too -

Oh my God, are you dense?! That was about whether the eminent domain clause permitted the government to take property from one PRIVATE OWNER and give it to another PRIVATE OWNER (there, Trump as a casino owner). The Supreme Court upheld that ruling.

This is about the government taking private property for government use--the very purpose the eminent domain clause was created for, and over 200 years of supporting precedent. Eminent domain cases involving government use are about the amount of just compensation, that is all. How can you not see this? Jesus, just read the ******* article you posted--it explains what eminent domain is used for.

 

[jknowgood]

What have they accomplished? A failed coop? I do appreciate it though. Y'all are gonna give Trump the power next year to be able to make roe vs wade a bad memory. Thanks to Pelosi and Schiff, I will send them a thank you note!

If you overturn RvW all that does is send it back to the States. States that want to make late term abortions legal can again.

Not if they declare a fetus, a living human.

It will return the decision back to the states. Period.

No if a fetus is ruled a living human, abortion becomes murder. As it should and if it happens, liberals can think themselves for it.

It's not going to happen. This is what people have been saying is going to happen for 45 years now. Doesn't getting nothing ever grow old?

Trump is going to be able to stack the supreme court if liberals lose big in November. That has never happened before either. Like I said this impeachment fiasco, could cost them. Not saying it will happen, but this is as close as we have ever been.

 

[White 6]

Supreme court ruled on using military funds for wall in June or July.
They sided with trump.
If they let it play out while lower litigation considered it, how do you think they will rule?

Texas land owners have yet begun to fight - JUST LIKE I'VE BEEN SAYING.

I already schooled you on this previously. It's called eminent domain. It's part of the Fifth Amendment. Government need only pay just compensation to land owners for government appropriation of private land. The "fight" is conducted as a civil matter over the value paid in an eminent domain case, not as an injunction against the appropriation. Read the Fifth Amendment sometime.

and the old woman in NY tied up Trumps imminent domain suit for over 20 years in the courts

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines.[4] Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000,[5] a quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

With the assistance of the Institute for Justice, Coking fought the local authorities and eventually prevailed.[6] Superior Court Judge Richard Williams ruled that because there were "no limits" on what Trump could do with the property, the plan to take Coking's property did not meet the test of law. But Williams' ruling did not reject the practice of using eminent domain to take private property from one individual and transferring it to another, which would eventually be upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kelo v. City of New London.

Two other properties that prevailed against eminent domain eventually did sell: Sabatini's restaurant received $2.1 million and a pawnshop sold for $1.6 million. Their lots became part of a large lawn flanking a taxi stand for Trump's casino.[1][7] Coking remained in her house until 2010, when she moved to a retirement home in the San Francisco Bay Area near her daughter and grandchildren.

Property records show that on June 2, 2010, Coking transferred ownership of the house to her daughter, who put it on the market in 2011 with an initial asking price of $5 million.[1][8] By September 2013 the price had been reduced to $1 million.[9]

The property was finally sold for $583,000 in an auction on July 31, 2014.[10] The buyer was Carl Icahn, who held the debt on Trump Entertainment, owner of Trump Plaza. He subsequently demolished the house on November 19, 2014.[11] Neither the Casino Reinvestment Development Authority nor the owners of Trump Plaza expressed any interest in the auction.[1]

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

And what does that have to do with the power of eminent domain by the government for the purposes of the border wall construction??

You do realize the example you listed pertained to an issue of first-impression--whether the power of eminent domain allowed the government to appropriate property of one private owner and transfer it to another private owner--right? And that ruling was later upheld by SCOTUS in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

The eminent domain issue here has absolutely nothing to do with that. This is appropriation by the government for government use. It is well-established law, and would involve a determination of fair compensation.

I'm certain you don't know anything about the issue you found in that article or its implications here, given that you've referred to this as "imminent" domain.

it means I just educated you about ED.

YA MORON -

Easy man. The old guy probably has ED. Sorry. Figured some jerk would say it and thought I might as well lower my messages to ratings ratio.

 

[Jitss617]

Voting map anyone??

 

[pknopp]

If you overturn RvW all that does is send it back to the States. States that want to make late term abortions legal can again.

Not if they declare a fetus, a living human.

It will return the decision back to the states. Period.

No if a fetus is ruled a living human, abortion becomes murder. As it should and if it happens, liberals can think themselves for it.

It's not going to happen. This is what people have been saying is going to happen for 45 years now. Doesn't getting nothing ever grow old?

Trump is going to be able to stack the supreme court if liberals lose big in November. That has never happened before either. Like I said this impeachment fiasco, could cost them. Not saying it will happen, but this is as close as we have ever been.

Yes it has happened before. Do I also need to remind you that it was Roberts that upheld Obamacare. Supreme Court justices are never the extreme partisans that extreme partisans want them to be.

 

[Siete]

Voting map anyone??

irrelevant -

 

[rightwinger]

Doesn’t matter anyway

Dems will tear down the wall once Trump is gone anyway
Just like Germany tore down the wall once the communists were gone

They won't tear it down. Drug smugglers are already cutting it down.

America needs its drugs, baby!

Well, once Trump is gone, we don’t need to physically tear it down

We just divert maintenance funds to more important things like roads, schools, healthcare
We also move border security personnel to more important functions

Within a year, the wall will be useless

 

[rightwinger]

Voting map anyone??

Maps don’t vote

 

[Meathead]

AKA REPAIR OLD FENCE.

That's one hell of a repair job!

Worth every penny.

Oh wait...

]

handing trumpdrones their ass isnt good enough

by all means break it off too.

You guys seen especially triggered today. Is it the impeachment hearings?

Irony.

You get ***** slapped and that's all you got?

By the way. I'm not the slightest bit worked up about Trump's impeachment. His legacy is set in stone now. The third president ever impeached. A hundred years from now, the only thing Americans will know about Donald J. Trump is that he was elected by Putin and tried to rig the 2020 election.

So...nice try. What else you got?

You are obviously more triggered than regular TDS. What did you expect? Did you really think this impeachment thingy would work. Do you also think the Dems have a chance next year?

Poor clueless bastard.

If it weren't so pathetic, it would be funny.

 

[francoHFW]

Which is fine. Just quit trying to defend his failures and lies.

What failures? He has also been one of the first presidents to keep almost all of his campaign promises.

I'm sure there are some fiction writing sites that would suit you better. TO be fair, Trump does take both sides of an argument many times. Hard to lose that way.

Thanks for proving my point.

of course the reason you hate Hillary is totally imaginary and proved to be nothing but garbage propaganda every time. Super dupe. Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty? The whole world thinks you are nuts....

Even Comey said she was guilty, said but she didn't intend too. Translation, she is a dumbass.

James Comey is a big mouth GOP jackass, super duper. She did nothing that general Powell and condoleezza didn't do.none of the secretaries of State even considered emails, just used them to communicate. And this ridiculous crap cost her the presidency. Unbelievably 60% of political coverage during the campaign was about her emails! Nobody gives a damn anymore except for brainwashed functional morons like you..
.

 

[jknowgood]

Not if they declare a fetus, a living human.

It will return the decision back to the states. Period.

No if a fetus is ruled a living human, abortion becomes murder. As it should and if it happens, liberals can think themselves for it.

It's not going to happen. This is what people have been saying is going to happen for 45 years now. Doesn't getting nothing ever grow old?

Trump is going to be able to stack the supreme court if liberals lose big in November. That has never happened before either. Like I said this impeachment fiasco, could cost them. Not saying it will happen, but this is as close as we have ever been.

Yes it has happened before. Do I also need to remind you that it was Roberts that upheld Obamacare. Supreme Court justices are never the extreme partisans that extreme partisans want them to be.

Like I said, Trump can stack the court with pro-ife justices. If he gets a super majority, looks like that will happen. Thanks to the stupidity of liberals.

 

[Jitss617]

Voting map anyone??

irrelevant -

We who rejected it?? Lol

 

[Jitss617]

Voting map anyone??

Maps don’t vote

Voting maps do its very red haha

 

[pknopp]

It will return the decision back to the states. Period.

No if a fetus is ruled a living human, abortion becomes murder. As it should and if it happens, liberals can think themselves for it.

It's not going to happen. This is what people have been saying is going to happen for 45 years now. Doesn't getting nothing ever grow old?

Trump is going to be able to stack the supreme court if liberals lose big in November. That has never happened before either. Like I said this impeachment fiasco, could cost them. Not saying it will happen, but this is as close as we have ever been.

Yes it has happened before. Do I also need to remind you that it was Roberts that upheld Obamacare. Supreme Court justices are never the extreme partisans that extreme partisans want them to be.

Like I said, Trump can stack the court with pro-ife justices. If he gets a super majority, looks like that will happen. Thanks to the stupidity of liberals.

The court had the chance to overturn RvW with the Casey decision but wouldn't do it.

 

[jknowgood]

What failures? He has also been one of the first presidents to keep almost all of his campaign promises.

I'm sure there are some fiction writing sites that would suit you better. TO be fair, Trump does take both sides of an argument many times. Hard to lose that way.

Thanks for proving my point.

of course the reason you hate Hillary is totally imaginary and proved to be nothing but garbage propaganda every time. Super dupe. Ever heard of innocent until proven guilty? The whole world thinks you are nuts....

Even Comey said she was guilty, said but she didn't intend too. Translation, she is a dumbass.

James Comey is a big mouth GOP jackass, super duper. She did nothing that general Powell and condoleezza didn't do.none of the secretaries of State even considered emails, just used them to communicate. And this ridiculous crap cost her the presidency. Unbelievably 60% of political coverage during the campaign was about her emails! Nobody gives a damn anymore except for brainwashed functional morons like you..
.

Actually all the whistleblowers that go against her, commits suicide.

 

[rightwinger]

Voting map anyone??

Maps don’t vote

Voting maps do its very red haha

No idea what you are babbling about

 

[Jitss617]

Voting map anyone??

Maps don’t vote

Voting maps do its very red haha

No idea what you are babbling about

It’s about the rejecting of the wall, according to the voting map it’s shows we want the wall.. thank you