Federal Judge Rules Mass Firings Illegal, Orders Them Put On Hold

[Man With A Plan]

I said Just is the law of the land, which is defined by Scotus.

Stop whining and fibbing. Don't be a magaturd.

The President will follow what the courts say.

"DOJ is the ultimate law in the land. Presidents will follow it, not interpret it." That's what you said, John. I corrected you (again!) The DOJ is not the law of the land...the Constitution is the law of the land.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

"DOJ is the ultimate law in the land. Presidents will follow it, not interpret it." That's what you said, John. I corrected you (again!) The DOJ is not the law of the land...the Constitution is the law of the land.

Yes, with Scotus, which Justice will follow.

The President follows the law, does not make it or interpret.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Yes, with Scotus, which Justice will follow.

The President follows the law, does not make it or interpret.

Think about this, John...if Justice "will follow" Soctus then obviously it's not the law of the land! Duh?
The Constitution is the law of the land and Constitutional law is interpreted by the Supreme Court.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Think about this, John...if Justice "will follow" Soctus then obviously it's not the law of the land! Duh?
The Constitution is the law of the land and Constitutional law is interpreted by the Supreme Court.

Justice is the law of the law, and SCOTUS is the boss in telling us what it means. The executive follows the judiciary.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Justice is the law of the law, and SCOTUS is the boss in telling us what it means. The executive follows the judiciary.

The Constitution is the "law of the law", John! Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Constitution is the "law of the law", John! Why is that so hard for you to grasp?

Scotus does not agree, so you lose.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Scotus does not agree, so you lose.

Scotus doesn't agree with what? That the Constitution is the law of the land? Of course they agree with that. It's literally their job to decide how the Constitution should be interpreted when something new rears it's head.

 

[Scoutster]

Trump needs to continue to ignore all these federal judges, get it to the supreme court for a final decision.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Think about this, John...if Justice "will follow" Soctus then obviously it's not the law of the land! Duh?
The Constitution is the law of the land and Constitutional law is interpreted by the Supreme Court.

Trump is subject to the law, thus subject to SCOTUS's rulings.

Very good. You are learning.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The law prevents Trump from ignoring judges.

 

[PeterPilot]

The judicial system is the only framework of law in America.

Even the President must obey.

The US judiciary is well known for questionable behavior, and the most recent example is the way they behaved regarding the election of 2020. They looked the other way and refused evidentiary hearings to whistleblowers in 60+ cases.