For a few weeks this board was filled with how Powell was going to "release the kraken" in court and blow the whole election out of the water.
Well she went to court.
She lost. Not once but twice.
LOL.
The woman brought the most ridiculous accusations with her to court with no real proof of her accusations.
When you include a person who has been dead for years in your conspiracy, you may as well hang it up. You're totally bat crap crazy.
Those of us who have working brains told you this would be the outcome of her ridiculous accusations.
A federal judge in Georgia dismissed pro-Trump attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood's lawsuit seeking to hand Georgia's election to lame-duck President Donald Trump.
lawandcrime.com
I can't believe these bozos are actually lawyers who are supposed to understand what "evidence" is!
I know, right?
What makes them think that security videos, sworn testimony of witnesses, affidavits of observers, IT systems experts, and statistical experts could possibly be used as “evidence”?
As if!
Then why hasn't Trump's team presented it in court? Why have they refused to even allege fraud in court?
Simple: there are standards of evidence in court. There are none for press conferences in front of land scaping companies.
You keep making these claims that these cases are all about “fraud”.
The biggest travesty so far is there was virtually no verification of signatures for mail in ballots. They are making the case that these are invalid without the verification, since most of the state laws require it. So they shouldn’t need to prove that “fraud” happened in all swing states that were close, they just need to show the law wasn’t followed.
In Pennsylvania for example, there is a case going to the Supreme Court soon. It has NOTHING to do with voter “fraud”. It’s about the FACT, that ALL mail in voting is unconstitutional according to their State constitution. The Republicans passed a law to make mail in voting legal (this was before WuFlu), but it also needed to be amended to the constitution of the state. They never did that. Then the Democrat Governor and Secretary of State just unilaterally decided to send out mass mail in votes. ALL of those votes are illegal, strictly speaking. The state court said that it will likely be founded that way. Alito is awaiting a response from the state due ͏b͏y Dec 8th.
Then SCOTUS will likely look at it and agree it was unconstitutional (under PA law) and rule that the election is in dispute. Then likely it will be up to the state legislators to figure out what to do.