Federal Court grants sweeping nationwide injunction against Trump DEI executive orders

So my comment was directed to the person I was responding to who although we don't agree on everything, I still am interested in his perspective.

You on the other hand responded with nothing but your opinions which are mostly erroneous so are you opposed to beginning with a few definitions?
Nevertheless you posted in public where everyone can see it and reply regards it's content.
If you don't want that then you should use the PM= Private Message.
BTW, you don't own this forum so can't make rules about your posts.
 
Why? Give me a logical reason. Does that body of water not ebb and flow on American shores?
Not to mention that "America" is the name of continents, as in 'North' and 'South' - America.
Says something about constrained thinking process when always applying "America" to USA only.
 
This has been cleared away and swept off the table by Trump that judges don’t invent their own law. That’s limited now to US AG or Trump himself
 
Last edited:
This has been cleared away and swept off the table by Trump that judges don’t invent their own law. That’s limited now to US AG or Trump himself
Yes, we know you think your king can just utter an edict and delete the constitution. Your cult is an historic embarrassment.
 
Yes, we know you think your king can just utter an edict and delete the constitution. Your cult is an historic embarrassment.
The previously imposed EO renders invalid a judge trying to undue the will if the 75 million who elected the POTUS
 
I see the orange charity thief canned a black general and installed a less qualified white person.

I.E., exactly what you MAGA ***** accuse DEI of doing.
 
It's the only way the left has to keep a certain segment of the population, down.
 
That is not what DEI does or rather how it works. If you have knowledge of something to the contrary please post it.
The E in DEI is "Equity" which according to Kamala means "we all end up at the same place."

This may seem like a trivial difference, but when it comes to public policy, the difference matters. A government should be obligated to treat all citizens equally, giving them the same access to civil rights and liberties like voting, marriage, religious freedom, and gun ownership. The government cannot deny rights to certain people because they are black, female, Muslim, etc.—this would be unequal treatment.

A mandate to foster equity, though, would give the government power to violate these rights in order to achieve identical social results for all people. In accordance with this thinking, the authorities might be justified in giving some people more rights than others. Indeed, this would arguably be strictly necessary, in order to create a society where everyone ends up in the exact same situation.

 
Meanwhile at least four federal judges appointed by Hussein Obama denied law suits aimed at Trump.
 
Nevertheless you posted in public where everyone can see it and reply regards it's content.
If you don't want that then you should use the PM= Private Message.
BTW, you don't own this forum so can't make rules about your posts.
I never said you couldn't respond to my post, I merely indicating that I was responding to a specific person and that I'm interested in his point of view instead of yours because you only offer your opinions on the topic with nothing to substantiate it.

As for the rules for the site, I'm not the one who has a problem posting within the rules:
1740283565741.webp
 
My mistake. Implying that it's common knowledge is what I should have stated.
Is that a smoke screen to avoid the main issue? I see that it is. Anyway, I didn't imply anything. I merely stated a fact but it seems that you have been implying that it isn't. However, seeing as you are now trying to smoke-screen the subject makes me believe that you know I am right and you would rather draw attention away from it.
 
Last edited:
15th post
‘A federal judge in Maryland temporarily blocked key portions of President Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the federal government and corporate America.

U.S. District Judge Adam B. Abelson granted a preliminary injunction on Friday that bars portions of Trump’s orders to cancel federal contracts with DEI components and require government contractors to certify that they do not engage in DEI practices that violate antidiscrimination laws. The order also prohibits enforcement against publicly traded companies and large universities with comparable policies.

In reference to enforcement against companies and universities, Abelson noted that the plaintiffs were “likely” to succeed on their claim that such actions would violate constitutionally protected free speech.

“That is textbook viewpoint-based discrimination,” Abelson wrote. “The government’s threat of enforcement is not just targeted towards enforcement of federal law. Rather, the provision expressly targets, and threatens, the expression of views supportive of equity, diversity and inclusion.”’


Very good.

The racist, bigoted right will of course denounce the ruling, consistent with their hate and unwarranted fear of diversity and inclusion, and their desire to compel conformity and silence dissent.
Didn't the Supreme Court already ban DEI filth ?
 
Trump ignored the decree rendered after his EO stopping such decrees
 
Back
Top Bottom