Harry Dresden
Only Adamantium Member
yes to the gulf of the Americas....No to Gulf of America.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes to the gulf of the Americas....No to Gulf of America.
Why? Give me a logical reason. Does that body of water not ebb and flow on American shores?No to Gulf of America.
Nevertheless you posted in public where everyone can see it and reply regards it's content.So my comment was directed to the person I was responding to who although we don't agree on everything, I still am interested in his perspective.
You on the other hand responded with nothing but your opinions which are mostly erroneous so are you opposed to beginning with a few definitions?
Not to mention that "America" is the name of continents, as in 'North' and 'South' - America.Why? Give me a logical reason. Does that body of water not ebb and flow on American shores?
Yes, we know you think your king can just utter an edict and delete the constitution. Your cult is an historic embarrassment.This has been cleared away and swept off the table by Trump that judges don’t invent their own law. That’s limited now to US AG or Trump himself
The previously imposed EO renders invalid a judge trying to undue the will if the 75 million who elected the POTUSYes, we know you think your king can just utter an edict and delete the constitution. Your cult is an historic embarrassment.
What a hilarious lie. I know you think the fat rapist can delete the constitution with a stroke of his oversized child Sharpie, but he can't.The previously imposed EO renders invalid a judge trying to undue the will if the 75 million who elected the POTUS
Another camella panty-sniffer chimes in. Brown was woke. Trump don't do woke.I see the orange charity thief canned a black general and installed a less qualified white person.
I.E., exactly what you MAGA ***** accuse DEI of doing.
The E in DEI is "Equity" which according to Kamala means "we all end up at the same place."That is not what DEI does or rather how it works. If you have knowledge of something to the contrary please post it.
This may seem like a trivial difference, but when it comes to public policy, the difference matters. A government should be obligated to treat all citizens equally, giving them the same access to civil rights and liberties like voting, marriage, religious freedom, and gun ownership. The government cannot deny rights to certain people because they are black, female, Muslim, etc.—this would be unequal treatment.
A mandate to foster equity, though, would give the government power to violate these rights in order to achieve identical social results for all people. In accordance with this thinking, the authorities might be justified in giving some people more rights than others. Indeed, this would arguably be strictly necessary, in order to create a society where everyone ends up in the exact same situation.
reason.com
My mistake. Implying that it's common knowledge is what I should have stated.I can do that if you want. Sure.
Did I say "it's common knowledge"? I'm sure that I didn't say that.
I never said you couldn't respond to my post, I merely indicating that I was responding to a specific person and that I'm interested in his point of view instead of yours because you only offer your opinions on the topic with nothing to substantiate it.Nevertheless you posted in public where everyone can see it and reply regards it's content.
If you don't want that then you should use the PM= Private Message.
BTW, you don't own this forum so can't make rules about your posts.
Is that a smoke screen to avoid the main issue? I see that it is. Anyway, I didn't imply anything. I merely stated a fact but it seems that you have been implying that it isn't. However, seeing as you are now trying to smoke-screen the subject makes me believe that you know I am right and you would rather draw attention away from it.My mistake. Implying that it's common knowledge is what I should have stated.
Didn't the Supreme Court already ban DEI filth ?‘A federal judge in Maryland temporarily blocked key portions of President Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the federal government and corporate America.
U.S. District Judge Adam B. Abelson granted a preliminary injunction on Friday that bars portions of Trump’s orders to cancel federal contracts with DEI components and require government contractors to certify that they do not engage in DEI practices that violate antidiscrimination laws. The order also prohibits enforcement against publicly traded companies and large universities with comparable policies.
In reference to enforcement against companies and universities, Abelson noted that the plaintiffs were “likely” to succeed on their claim that such actions would violate constitutionally protected free speech.
“That is textbook viewpoint-based discrimination,” Abelson wrote. “The government’s threat of enforcement is not just targeted towards enforcement of federal law. Rather, the provision expressly targets, and threatens, the expression of views supportive of equity, diversity and inclusion.”’
Very good.
The racist, bigoted right will of course denounce the ruling, consistent with their hate and unwarranted fear of diversity and inclusion, and their desire to compel conformity and silence dissent.