Fed up with Mexico

[brummelben]

Read most of it, skimmed the rest.


As you sort of say, it mostly talks about this all from the perspective of NOT AMERICANS.

With no mention of our interests or concerns.

Guy, it's actually in our interest to have a good relationship with Mexico and not piss them off. WHich was the gist of the argument, Rex having to run down there to fix all the problems Cheeto Jesus is causing.

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

That is a huge part of the story, which the Times didn't report.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

 

[Correll]

Read most of it, skimmed the rest.


As you sort of say, it mostly talks about this all from the perspective of NOT AMERICANS.

With no mention of our interests or concerns.

Guy, it's actually in our interest to have a good relationship with Mexico and not piss them off. WHich was the gist of the argument, Rex having to run down there to fix all the problems Cheeto Jesus is causing.

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

That is a huge part of the story, which the Times didn't report.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

 

[brummelben]

Read most of it, skimmed the rest.


As you sort of say, it mostly talks about this all from the perspective of NOT AMERICANS.

With no mention of our interests or concerns.

Guy, it's actually in our interest to have a good relationship with Mexico and not piss them off. WHich was the gist of the argument, Rex having to run down there to fix all the problems Cheeto Jesus is causing.

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

That is a huge part of the story, which the Times didn't report.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

 

[JoeB131]

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

I think the word you are looking for is "Status Quo", and you are right, it's not a good relationship. We've been ******* over Mexico for 170 years.

Trump is making it worse, though.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

Um. Not really. If anything, NAFTA has been a shit sandwich to some sectors of the Mexican economy, too. For instance, Mexicans who farmed traditional white corn have found themselves priced out of the market because the Mexican market has been flooded with genetically engineered, government subsidized yellow corn from the Midwest. A lot of these illegal immigrants you are terrified want to date your womenfolk in Jesusland used to be farmers who got displaced and are now taking the jobs your menfolk in Jesusland don't want to do.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

The problem with "Traditional Middle America" is that it's kind of backwards and shit-ignorant and doesn't see that we all live in an interconnected world. Seriously, your real problem is, you are one step above the Amish. You can't wall the rest of the world off. You have to learn to live with it.

 

[Correll]

Read most of it, skimmed the rest.


As you sort of say, it mostly talks about this all from the perspective of NOT AMERICANS.

With no mention of our interests or concerns.

Guy, it's actually in our interest to have a good relationship with Mexico and not piss them off. WHich was the gist of the argument, Rex having to run down there to fix all the problems Cheeto Jesus is causing.

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

That is a huge part of the story, which the Times didn't report.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

 

[brummelben]

Guy, it's actually in our interest to have a good relationship with Mexico and not piss them off. WHich was the gist of the argument, Rex having to run down there to fix all the problems Cheeto Jesus is causing.

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

That is a huge part of the story, which the Times didn't report.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

 

[Correll]

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

I think the word you are looking for is "Status Quo", and you are right, it's not a good relationship. We've been ******* over Mexico for 170 years.

Trump is making it worse, though.

Your reflexive siding against America is the same lib reflex we see in the media, and specifically with the NYT in the op.

ONly an anti-american fool could think that the status quo relationship with Mexico was slanted in our favor.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

Um. Not really. If anything, NAFTA has been a shit sandwich to some sectors of the Mexican economy, too. For instance, Mexicans who farmed traditional white corn have found themselves priced out of the market because the Mexican market has been flooded with genetically engineered, government subsidized yellow corn from the Midwest. A lot of these illegal immigrants you are terrified want to date your womenfolk in Jesusland used to be farmers who got displaced and are now taking the jobs your menfolk in Jesusland don't want to do.

The trade balance is 58 billion in favor of Mexico.

Your anti-Christianity is noted. YOu are a bigot.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

The problem with "Traditional Middle America" is that it's kind of backwards and shit-ignorant and doesn't see that we all live in an interconnected world. Seriously, your real problem is, you are one step above the Amish. You can't wall the rest of the world off. You have to learn to live with it.

And again we see that the Left has nothing but contempt for Middle America. This is the same type of bigotry that drives the complete failure of the New York Times to do it's ******* job.

Of course people like you can't or won't report fairly on the interests of Middle Americans, because you hate us.

YOu are the enemy.

 

[Correll]

Our statue quo relationship prior to Trump, has not been a good relationship.

Our interest were being greatly harmed to benefit Mexico.

That is a huge part of the story, which the Times didn't report.

They are advocates for ANYONE and EVERYTHING, that is not Traditional Middle America.

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

You might want to do some reading on how elections and governments work.

 

[brummelben]

How were our interests harmed to benefit Mexico? You just don't make a claim like that without something to back it up. Lets see what you got

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

You might want to do some reading on how elections and governments work.

Trump isn't my President, and equally so for millions of Americans.

 

[Unkotare]

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

You might want to do some reading on how elections and governments work.

Trump isn't my President, and equally so for millions of Americans.

Are you a citizen of the United States of America?

 

[brummelben]

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

You might want to do some reading on how elections and governments work.

Trump isn't my President, and equally so for millions of Americans.

Are you a citizen of the United States of America?

Thats exactly why Trump isn't my President. he does not speak for the majority of our citizens

 

[Unkotare]

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

You might want to do some reading on how elections and governments work.

Trump isn't my President, and equally so for millions of Americans.

Are you a citizen of the United States of America?

Thats exactly why Trump isn't my President. he does not speak for the majority of our citizens

You didn't answer my question.

 

[Correll]

1. The huge illegal immigration problem, harms us, benefits them.

2. 58 billion dollar trade deficit.

Actually the immigration problem as you call it, helps us as well. We have trade deficits with lots of countries, and many well over 58 billion . Remember Mexico is one of our biggest trading partners

1. That is a matter of opinion. Trump, speaking for America disagrees, and the NYT did not mention it at all.

2. Yes we have trade deficits with a lot of nations. We have been the world's ***** for a long time. THat does not explain why the NYTs did not see fit to mention it at all.

Trump does NOT speak for America and never will.

You might want to do some reading on how elections and governments work.

Trump isn't my President, and equally so for millions of Americans.

LIke I said, go read some. Get back to me when you are better acquainted with how governments, and elections work, and with the meanings of common english words.

 

[JoeB131]

Your reflexive siding against America is the same lib reflex we see in the media, and specifically with the NYT in the op.

ONly an anti-american fool could think that the status quo relationship with Mexico was slanted in our favor.

Of course it is. If it wasn't, you'd have Americans sneaking into Mexico, not the other way around.

You just aren't very bright, are you?

As far as patriotism, only one of us has a DD214.

The trade balance is 58 billion in favor of Mexico.

Your anti-Christianity is noted. YOu are a bigot.

When so called "Christians" start acting like Jesus said to, I'll treat them with respect. Jesus never said, "Build a wall to keep the Beaner kids out!"

The US Economy is 19 Trillion. The Mexican Economy is 2.3 Trillion. that 58 Billion you whine about is a drop in the bucket.

And again we see that the Left has nothing but contempt for Middle America. This is the same type of bigotry that drives the complete failure of the New York Times to do it's ******* job.

The NYT did it's job just fine. It told me exactly what the meeting between Tillerson and the Mexican government was about. The opinion of Cleetus in Jesusland was completely irrelevant to that discussion

Of course people like you can't or won't report fairly on the interests of Middle Americans, because you hate us.

YOu are the enemy.

No, you are your own worst enemy, that's the problem.

Every year, you red state shitheads march out and vote for guys like Reagan or the Bushes or Trumpenfuhrer, and you get recessions and wars and a continous lessening of your economic status. And the only reason why you guys aren't completely in the poorhouse now is because we get a guy like Clinton or Obama who presides over growth and makes sure you get a share of it.

But you go right back to the guys who happily slap you around with bad policies because they mouth the right words about Jesus and gays and guns.

I don't hate you. I feel sorry for you.

.

 

[Mac1958]

Both of our countries would be significantly better off if Mexico's "leaders" would rise above the corruption and make their country a place from which its people don't want to desperately escape.

Its people deserve much better.
.

 

[rhodescholar]

Can someone help me out here? The New York Times, New York is an America city.
I see in the article much reporting on Mexican interests and concerns. I didn't see anything about American Interests being represented or advanced.
Did I miss it? Or is that just the way it is?

You are absolutely correct; in the cover article of today's edition you'll see an article attacking the ICE officers themselves, just a disgraceful ******* rag.

This POS fake news publication is totally all-in and committed to the open borders agenda as required by its owner Carlos Slim, whose billion-dollar empire rests upon an endless flow of illegals, along with supporting the national democratic party. This rag couldn't care less what this position does to its already severely damaged reputation, that is an afterthought.

 

[Correll]

Your reflexive siding against America is the same lib reflex we see in the media, and specifically with the NYT in the op.

ONly an anti-american fool could think that the status quo relationship with Mexico was slanted in our favor.

Of course it is. If it wasn't, you'd have Americans sneaking into Mexico, not the other way around.

You just aren't very bright, are you?

As far as patriotism, only one of us has a DD214..

The lack of Americans sneaking into Mexico does NOT support your position, you anti-american asshole.

The trade balance is 58 billion in favor of Mexico.

Your anti-Christianity is noted. YOu are a bigot.

.

When so called "Christians" start acting like Jesus said to, I'll treat them with respect. Jesus never said, "Build a wall to keep the Beaner kids out!".

Our generosity is not infinite and it has been exhausted, long ago.


.

The US Economy is 19 Trillion. The Mexican Economy is 2.3 Trillion. that 58 Billion you whine about is a drop in the bucket..

Tell that to the hundreds of thousands of workers who have lost jobs that were outsourced to Mexico.

And again we see that the Left has nothing but contempt for Middle America. This is the same type of bigotry that drives the complete failure of the New York Times to do it's ******* job.

.

The NYT did it's job just fine. It told me exactly what the meeting between Tillerson and the Mexican government was about. The opinion of Cleetus in Jesusland was completely irrelevant to that discussion.

Presenting one side of the story is not doing it's job fine. It is the exact opposite of doing their job fine.

Your racism and bigotry is noted. THey are not supporting arguments, they actually UNDERMINE your credibility, moron.

Of course people like you can't or won't report fairly on the interests of Middle Americans, because you hate us.

YOu are the enemy.

.

No, you are your own worst enemy, that's the problem.

Every year, you red state shitheads march out and vote for guys like Reagan or the Bushes or Trumpenfuhrer, and you get recessions and wars and a continous lessening of your economic status. And the only reason why you guys aren't completely in the poorhouse now is because we get a guy like Clinton or Obama who presides over growth and makes sure you get a share of it.

But you go right back to the guys who happily slap you around with bad policies because they mouth the right words about Jesus and gays and guns.

I don't hate you. I feel sorry for you.

.

No, it's painfully obvious that you hate us, and not only won't try to advance our interests, but are actively HOSTILE to our interests to the point of committing professional fraud, in order to prevent even AIRING our interests.

 

[rhodescholar]

The black community is what causes our crime rates to be so high, but you wont want to talk about that. No, solving THAT problem involves facing some hard truths that you lefties just arent prepared to face. Thats cool, you can just continue to ignore it and im sure that will fix the problem. Afterall, if you start holding black people accountable for their actions, that means youre a racist. Its better to just ignore it and focus and white republicans, right? Yeah, we all know thats what YOU are going to do, while at the same time whining about our prison population.

A big part of the problems in the black community today is that the illegals have stolen a lot of the jobs once done by blacks, so they have no economic options.

Interestingly, great black intellectuals and writers as far back as 100 years ago such as WEB DuBois and Frederick Douglass wrote extensively against the importation of large numbers of poor migrants and open immigration policies, as they recognized how it would be so damaging to the prospects and well being of the black community. Look them both up and see their writings on immigration for yourself, its yet another crushing fact the liberals and leftist trash prefer to avoid.

But that was back when the black community had intelligent leadership, not the rabble and shit like it has today, completely owned by the democrats who could not give a flying **** about them.

 

[rhodescholar]

You see, all you dumbasses who lost your jobs to automation and then blamed the Mexicans, your interest would be to wake up and move on, not look for someone to blame.

This is why I put unintelligent assholes like this on ignore; no facts - just bluster and lies.

******* retard, the waitressing, construction, fast food, hotel-bed-making/service industries are NOT automated you idiot asshole. These are all jobs the black and minority, working-class communities once did and earned decent livings at - until the illegal alien mass invasion destroyed them.

Get some facts before posting next time, moron.

 

[rhodescholar]

Did you actually read the article? It mostly talks about how Tillerson has to spend so much time fixing all the international relationships Cheeto Jesus is ******* up with his big mouth and tiny fingers on this Twitter.

All of a sudden you liberal assholes are worried about damaged foreign relationships? Where the **** were you when obama was caught tapping Merkel's private cell phone, or pissing off Saudi Arabia, Japan, Egypt, South Korea, etc?

Sorry asshole, at this point the only countries who are upset with the US are the ones who have been benefitting from financially ******* over the US, like Mexico and Germany with its refusal to pay its fair share of NATO's budget. Sorry to Honduras et al, but signing up to be their welfare cash machine wasn't part of my job description when I started working.