FDR’s Subservience To Stalin Cost Thousand Of American Soldier’s Lives

[AMart]

Carter installed the Ayatollah.
The Democrats were already in the totalitarian camp post Viet Nam.
Anything, any nation, that was anti-America was a friend to the Democrats.
Or.....is there any reason you can think of to guarantee nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?


How could America have avoided entering the war: we were attacked, and Germany was Japan's ally.

No issue blowing up Japan. Relative to Europe just sit back and see what happens. It wasn't a forgone conclusion that the USA should enter that war. British Intelligence set up shop at Rockefeller Plaza and engaged in propaganda to sway Americans and politicians that the USA should enter the war.

 

[Ringo]

FDR's man-crush on Stalin also plunged Eastern Europe into 50 years of communist oppression and killed tens of millions of people.

Hundreds, hundreds of millions!
By the way not only FDR was soviet agent, but mr. Conservatism itself:

In January 1947, nearly a year after his “iron curtain” speech at Fulton, Missouri – Churchill received a message from Stalin via Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, who had just visited Moscow. Stalin told Churchill that he would “always have the happiest memories of [his] work with the great war leader of Britain” and that he had “the greatest respect and admiration for what Churchill had done during the war”.
Churchill replied to Stalin that: “Your life is not only precious to your country, which you saved, but to the friendship between Soviet Russia and the English-speaking world.”
This correspondence may be found in both the British and Russian archives.

 

[Oddball]

No issue blowing up Japan. Relative to Europe just sit back and see what happens. It wasn't a forgone conclusion that the USA should enter that war. British Intelligence set up shop at Rockefeller Plaza and engaged in propaganda to sway Americans and politicians that the USA should enter the war.

FDR wanted war....The direct provocation known as the AVG was operating in China well in advance of 7 Dec.

 

[Ringo]

No issue blowing up Japan. Relative to Europe just sit back and see what happens.

Why just sit when you can join arian race? Not all of you, of course, would feat in ubermemsch category, but who cares about untermensch and darkies. Right, parteigenosse?

American Nazis in the 1930s—The German American Bund

In the United States, the German American Bund, an American Nazi organization, was formed in 1936, and soon grew to have tens of thousands of members.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

No issue blowing up Japan. Relative to Europe just sit back and see what happens. It wasn't a forgone conclusion that the USA should enter that war. British Intelligence set up shop at Rockefeller Plaza and engaged in propaganda to sway Americans and politicians that the USA should enter the war.

Why would America not enter that war?

 

[Ringo]

And Stalin in your friend.

Stalin is a hero and inspiration for all human race

 

[PoliticalChic]

Stalin is a hero and inspiration for all human race

 

[marvin martian]

Hundreds, hundreds of millions!
By the way not only FDR was soviet agent, but mr. Conservatism itself:

In January 1947, nearly a year after his “iron curtain” speech at Fulton, Missouri – Churchill received a message from Stalin via Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery, who had just visited Moscow. Stalin told Churchill that he would “always have the happiest memories of [his] work with the great war leader of Britain” and that he had “the greatest respect and admiration for what Churchill had done during the war”.
Churchill replied to Stalin that: “Your life is not only precious to your country, which you saved, but to the friendship between Soviet Russia and the English-speaking world.”
This correspondence may be found in both the British and Russian archives.

Churchill was a good statesman, but privately he despised Stalin and warned FDR about what would happen in Europe after the war. Churchill's own memoirs make this very clear.

FDR was just a closet commie, and gave Stalin everything he asked for and more.

Are you denying that Stalin's negotiations after the war led to the oppression of Eastern Europe under Soviet rule? Or are you a communist who believes that what happened in Eastern Europe in the 40s-90s was just wonderful?

 

[Ringo]

Could have easily commandeered German tanks and other hardware to turn on the Soviets and run them back to Moscow....

Really? How came that Hitler didn't think of it - "commandeered German tanks and other hardware to turn on the Soviets and run them back to Moscow." What a fool he was!
And of course, the citizens of the United States and Great Britain would be so happy to see their sons united with the Nazis against their heroic allies of yesterday ... And the soldiers themselves, still full of impressions from what they saw in the nazi concentration camps, would be happy to unite with the Krauts...
A terrible thing is that people like you allowed to vote.

 

[Ringo]

The Soviets attacked a demoralized army that had been stripped of trained manpower for both the pacific war and to bolster the defense of the home islands.

The Bomb Didn’t Beat Japan. Stalin Did.

Have 70 years of nuclear policy been based on a lie?

foreignpolicy.com

"...If the Japanese were not concerned with city bombing in general or the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in particular, what were they concerned with? The answer
is simple: the Soviet Union.

The Japanese were in a relatively difficult strategic situation. They were nearing the end of a war they were losing. Conditions were bad. The Army, however, was still strong and well-supplied. Nearly 4 million men were under arms and 1.2 million of those were guarding Japan’s home islands....
It didn’t take a military genius to see that, while it might be possible to fight a decisive battle against one great power invading from one direction, it would not be possible to fight off two great powers attacking from two different directions. The Soviet invasion invalidated the military’s decisive battle strategy, just as it invalidated the diplomatic strategy. At a single stroke, all of Japan’s options evaporated. The Soviet invasion was strategically decisive — it foreclosed both of Japan’s options — while the bombing of Hiroshima (which foreclosed neither) was not.
The Soviet declaration of war also changed the calculation of how much time was left for maneuver. Japanese intelligence was predicting that U.S. forces might not invade for months. Soviet forces, on the other hand, could be in Japan proper in as little as 10 days. The Soviet invasion made a decision on ending the war extremely time sensitive."

 

[Oddball]

Really? How came that Hitler didn't think of it - "commandeered German tanks and other hardware to turn on the Soviets and run them back to Moscow." What a fool!
And of course, the citizens of the United States and Great Britain would be so happy to see their sons united with the Nazis against their heroic allies of yesterday ... And the soldiers themselves, still full of impressions from what they saw in the nazi concentration camps, would be happy to unite with the Krauts...
A terrible thing is that people like you allowed to vote.

Hitler was already dead, sub-cretin.

 

[Otis Mayfield]

Take the blinders off, dunce.


View attachment 542131

Let's just start off with one thing.

"America wanted the Soviets to take the brunt of the casualties during WWII."

Do you believe that?

 

[Ringo]

Hitler was already dead, sub-cretin.

Do you even think before you write? Or are your lines the product of a random selection of typing on the keyboard?

 

[Oddball]

Do you even think before you write? Or are your lines the product of a random selection of typing on the keyboard?

I'm not the one with timeline problems, sub-cretin.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's just start off with one thing.

"America wanted the Soviets to take the brunt of the casualties during WWII."

Do you believe that?

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.


Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?​

 

[Ringo]

Yup!

'Russia Uber Alles'​

​

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?​

You are really nazi moron...

 

[Otis Mayfield]

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."​

Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.​

​

​

Yup!​

'Russia Uber Alles'​

​

What nation did Roosevelt represent, again?​

Soviet casualties 27,000,000

American casualties 405,000

Is that more clear?

The Soviets defeated the Germans. We helped some, yes, but the Soviets bore the brunt of that war.

Yes, the European theater was more important than the Pacific. That's obvious.

.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Soviet casualties 27,000,000

American casualties 405,000

Is that more clear?

The Soviets defeated the Germans. We helped some, yes, but the Soviets bore the brunt of that war.

Yes, the European theater was more important than the Pacific. That's obvious.

.

Those Soviet casualties were caused by .....

....wait for it....


THE SOVIETS.

World War II left over 27 million Soviet citizens dead....but only a fraction of them were killed by the Germans. Yet throughout the West. 'war crimes' is a phrase only attached to the Nazis. When the Red Army marched, an NKVD army marched behind, with its own tanks, machine guns, firing forward....never allowing retreat. More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.​

​

The Soviet Union killed more than twenty million men, women and children.​

THEIR OWN!!!



Former USSR leader Joseph Stalin is estimated to have killed millions of people for various reasons. Reports from the Soviet archives show prisoners under Stalin's regime who were executed either for political or criminal offences. Around 158,000 soldiers were also executed for deserting the war. http://www.ask.com/question/why-did-stalin-kill-so-many-people

"Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin"​

Major Soviet Paper Says 20 Million Died As Victims of Stalin (Published 1989)

www.nytimes.com

More than a million Soviet citizens joined the Nazis. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal"byNikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Stalin.....FDR's lord and master.

 

[marvin martian]

Soviet casualties 27,000,000

American casualties 405,000

Is that more clear?

The Soviets defeated the Germans. We helped some, yes, but the Soviets bore the brunt of that war.

Yes, the European theater was more important than the Pacific. That's obvious.

.

What's clear there is how little the communists value human life. Stalin used them to dampen artillery fire and charge machine guns.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What's clear there is how little the communists value human life. Stalin used them to dampen artillery fire and charge machine guns.

"In 1945 Zhukov is reported to have said to US General Dwight D. Eisenhower, "If we come to a minefield, our infantry attacks exactly as it were not there." The shear weight of numbers eventually drove the Germans back, along with the Soviet leadership's determination not to relent, whatever the cost." http://www.moreorless.net.au/heroes/zhukov.html