Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 136,522
- 28,315
- 2,180
[......
Europe and Asia would not be the same without him
Yeah, millions and millions of people might not have suffered under the yolk of communism.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[......
Europe and Asia would not be the same without him
“On February 19, 1942 — seventy-four years ago today — Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066. With the stroke of his pen, the man who had earlier snubbed Jesse Owens after the Berlin Olympics used his executive powers to order the imprisonment of over 100,000 persons of Japanese ancestry (as well as thousands of German and Italian ancestry) for the duration of World War II.”
People will put certain people on pedestals when they really shouldn't.
George Washington went around killing Native Americans in a ruthless manner.
Ronald Reagan allowed the Japanese to buy up a lot of America, did the Iran-Contra affair along with a load of other stuff that gets ignored.
Presidents can't keep everyone happy, but if they try to keep a few happy, they'll annoy everyone else, so they try and keep as many happy as possible, meaning they'll annoy everyone at the same time. They just have to hope that these people will forget, and they do.
FDR is easily acknowledged as our greatest president at home and around the world. He saved our nation and saved England, France, Netherlands, as well as Italy, Germany and Japan
We elected him four times.
Europe and Asia would not be the same without him
So if one thinks of how WWII ended the depression they realize that the New Deal simply did not spend enough during the depression.The scumbag fdr did not “end the Depression,” the end of WWII did .
So if one thinks of how WWII ended the depression they realize that the New Deal simply did not spend enough during the depression.The scumbag fdr did not “end the Depression,” the end of WWII did .
I made it as simple as I could. Think about a bit and itSo if one thinks of how WWII ended the depression they realize that the New Deal simply did not spend enough during the depression.The scumbag fdr did not “end the Depression,” the end of WWII did .
Illogical, again.
I made it as simple as I could. Think about a bit and itSo if one thinks of how WWII ended the depression they realize that the New Deal simply did not spend enough during the depression.The scumbag fdr did not “end the Depression,” the end of WWII did .
Illogical, again.
might make sense.
If FDR took too long to end the Great Depression, why didn't Hoover end it? Hoover had almost four years, and Hoover's plan was to loan money to manufacturers to make more of the same product that was already stacked on the shelves as unsalable. It was unsalable because people didn't have money to buy. FDR believed people had to have money to survive and to buy to end the depression. The old Republican cry of "Balance the Budget" was as useless as they were. But the Great Depression was a bonanza for the wealthy, if we think of the buying power of just one dollar during that period.
FDR and Abe shit all over our Constitution and Americans from all sides worship them. Blows my goddamn mind.
FDR was a disaster. His stupid economic policies prolonged the Great Depression, causing terrible suffering for millions of Americans. He forced farmers to destroy their products, when Americans were starving...them lied us into war.
Are some posters saying that both the American people and America's best historians have had it wrong about FDR. The people elected him four times in a row and might still be voting for him had he lived. Name another president elected four times. Historians have never placed FDR below third best president since 1948, and recently named FDR best American president.
Is it possible that Trump supporters are getting ready to replace FDR as America's best president with Trump?
I know you're slow, but really...this slow?If FDR took too long to end the Great Depression, why didn't Hoover end it? Hoover had almost four years, and Hoover's plan was to loan money to manufacturers to make more of the same product that was already stacked on the shelves as unsalable. It was unsalable because people didn't have money to buy. FDR believed people had to have money to survive and to buy to end the depression. The old Republican cry of "Balance the Budget" was as useless as they were. But the Great Depression was a bonanza for the wealthy, if we think of the buying power of just one dollar during that period.
Sadly nearly all our presidents from Wilson on, have been disasters.FDR was a disaster. His stupid economic policies prolonged the Great Depression, causing terrible suffering for millions of Americans. He forced farmers to destroy their products, when Americans were starving...them lied us into war.
Its sick how these traiters to america like him and Eisenhower are put on a pedastal and put on our coins. how those two corrupt ever made it on our coins is just sick. Its a joke how the sheep in america think that FDR created jobs and got out of a depression,the asshole FUELED the depression.
So ninety years after the fact, two UCLA professors have decided they have the answer to the Great Depression. America and FDR should have waited until the UCLA book came out before feeding the hungry and trying to alleviate conditions. I wonder how if the UCLA economists have now come up with a plan to prevent depressions and recessions?
FDR and Abe shit all over our Constitution and Americans from all sides worship them. Blows my goddamn mind.
same as warmongers Ike and Reagan.....