Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the age of consent is sixteen this should be available to sixteen year olds, too.
But KMAN would rather have the government enforcing morals thereby protecting his...what a chump.
Why not? Anyone can buy condoms.Absolute horseshit
Under 18 = minor.... there is NO WAY that this should be given to any minor without parental consent
Why not? Anyone can buy condoms.Absolute horseshit
Under 18 = minor.... there is NO WAY that this should be given to any minor without parental consent
There is almost no difference between a condom and the morning after pill. Both merely prevent conception.Why not? Anyone can buy condoms.Absolute horseshit
Under 18 = minor.... there is NO WAY that this should be given to any minor without parental consent
Funny.... there is a difference... just as there is between a batch of gunpowder, brass, a firing pin, a barrel, etc and a loaded weapon
And funny... seems like things like Sudafed require ID, kids can't just go buy it... but a morning after pill is not??
Give me a break
After thinking about this I don't believe there should be an age restriction at all. A parent forcing a minor to give birth against her will would be guilty of child abuse, imo.
Yes.
A 17-year old of today has more information and knowledge about the world and themselves than a 35 year old during the 1980s would have had.
I think they should lower it to 15 to be honest. Who is a parent to say that a 15-year old must stay pregnant and deliver a baby?
If the parents have no control over their seventeen year old's sexual activity, they failed as parents and made themselves irrelevant.
After thinking about this I don't believe there should be an age restriction at all. A parent forcing a minor to give birth against her will would be guilty of child abuse, imo.
Yes.
A 17-year old of today has more information and knowledge about the world and themselves than a 35 year old during the 1980s would have had.
I think they should lower it to 15 to be honest. Who is a parent to say that a 15-year old must stay pregnant and deliver a baby?
Totally disagree. Do you think condoms should only be sold to eighteen year olds and above as well?After thinking about this I don't believe there should be an age restriction at all. A parent forcing a minor to give birth against her will would be guilty of child abuse, imo.Yes.
A 17-year old of today has more information and knowledge about the world and themselves than a 35 year old during the 1980s would have had.
I think they should lower it to 15 to be honest. Who is a parent to say that a 15-year old must stay pregnant and deliver a baby?
A parent is responsible for the behavior, well being, and guidance/direction of the child. Hence they are in the custody of the parent or guardian....
Forcing a child to have sex, that would be abuse. Deciding for the child to give birth instead of murdering the unborn is not abuse. Just as deciding on other moral and medical issues is not abuse.
18 year old... they can make their personal decisions.. .get emancipated, and they can make their own decisions... but as a minor, no way in hell
Absolute horseshit
Under 18 = minor.... there is NO WAY that this should be given to any minor without parental consent
Totally disagree. Do you think condoms should only be sold to eighteen year olds and above as well?After thinking about this I don't believe there should be an age restriction at all. A parent forcing a minor to give birth against her will would be guilty of child abuse, imo.
A parent is responsible for the behavior, well being, and guidance/direction of the child. Hence they are in the custody of the parent or guardian....
Forcing a child to have sex, that would be abuse. Deciding for the child to give birth instead of murdering the unborn is not abuse. Just as deciding on other moral and medical issues is not abuse.
18 year old... they can make their personal decisions.. .get emancipated, and they can make their own decisions... but as a minor, no way in hell
After thinking about this I don't believe there should be an age restriction at all. A parent forcing a minor to give birth against her will would be guilty of child abuse, imo.
Yes.
A 17-year old of today has more information and knowledge about the world and themselves than a 35 year old during the 1980s would have had.
I think they should lower it to 15 to be honest. Who is a parent to say that a 15-year old must stay pregnant and deliver a baby?
Absolute horseshit
Under 18 = minor.... there is NO WAY that this should be given to any minor without parental consent
Why not?
Can a minor drive a car? Get married? Have sex?
The answer to all three are: Yes.
So why can't a minor decide if she wants to prevent pregnancy? Please note: The morning after pill is NOT an abortion pill.