FDA Forced to Retract Statements Saying Ivermectin Does Not Work Against COVID

[boevans]

WTF??

are you mentally ill or what??

I said after they were vaccinated,,

There's that stupidity again. You are wrong.

 

[Billiejeens]

... only because of MAGA stupdity that caused so many to avoid it.

Insanity

 

[boevans]

Insanity

Yes, MAGA insanity is such a virulent issue in America.

 

[Billiejeens]

WTF??

are you mentally ill or what??

I said after they were vaccinated,,

That one is stupid beyond help.

 

[progressive hunter]

There's that stupidity again. You are wrong.

View attachment 929388

I hope youre not trying to tell me no vaccinated person has ever died from covid,,

 

[boevans]

I hope you are not saying you are far less likely to be injured by Covid if you avoid the vax.

 

[Meister]

I stopped reading at
"Ivermectin, 'wonder drug' from Japan: the human use perspective".

Of course you did, can't handle the facts.
No surprise

 

[Meister]

It's being downplayed as an effective drug against covid.

Be ause it is not effective against covid.

Try to focus.

sure, skippy, sure.

 

[Meister]

You are babbling. The FDA was criticized for taking too much authority, not for a misguided finding, like you just did.

what????

 

[boevans]

what????

Reread the OP.

 

[Billiejeens]

I hope you are not saying you are far less likely to be injured by Covid if you avoid the vax.

Everyone says that

 

[Meister]

Reread the OP.

Read post 58.

 

[Leo123]

MAGAs on ivermectin are wrong. The ruling did not affect FDA's finding on the uselessness of ivermectin on Covid.

Wrong about what exactly?

 

[eagle1462010]

Yay. You want to be Sudan now. Stupid fucker.

2.7 billion people less deaths than us. Who is the stupid fucks!

 

[boevans]

Read post 58.

Meister hiding on the wall.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

So when do the apologies come for all those elderly people who died but didn't have to.

‘Blood on Its Hands’: FDA Will Remove Anti-ivermectin Social Media, Website Posts Under Lawsuit Settlement Agreement

The FDA, which denied any wrongdoing, said it will remove content warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 within 21 days. Plaintiffs called the settlement a big win for patients and the patient-physician relationship.

childrenshealthdefense.org

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to take down its website and social media posts warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 under terms of a settlement reached Thursday in a lawsuit alleging the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the drug.

Within 21 days, the agency will remove the consumer update, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which pictures a doctor and a horse. The FDA posted the update on March 5, 2021.

The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”

The FDA will also delete social media posts from Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posted in 2021 and 2022 with messages such as “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.””

Below: FDA post on Twitter implying that Ivermetin was only for livestock

A compendium of existing scientific literature on the use of Ivermectin for COVID, c19ivm.org, has long reported since the start of COVID that when Ivermectin is used:

“Statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies. 61 studies from 55 independent teams in 25 different countries show statistically significant improvements.

Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 85% [77‑90%] lower risk for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results for higher quality studies, primary outcomes, peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 61 of 101 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.”

This is just another example of how WEF/Democrat media does nothing but gaslight Americans

 

[dudmuck]

Why don't you read post #58. That should make it very clear just how stupid you really are, Jack.
You don't know shit, yet you just keep hammering away with a nerf hammer

the medical study in post 58 says nothing about using it for viral infections. There were other drugs that turned out to be more effective for that virus.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Why da fuck would we now bitch? Natural immunity from having covid is better than a clot shot or 5 an still getting it.

Unless it kills you of course, which is the whole point of vaccinations.
Pro-tip why don't you use this theory for polio.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Unless it kills you of course, which is the whole point of vaccinations.
Pro-tip why don't you use this theory for polio.

Polio is a vaxx, the jab is not.

 

[hadit]

So when do the apologies come for all those elderly people who died but didn't have to.

‘Blood on Its Hands’: FDA Will Remove Anti-ivermectin Social Media, Website Posts Under Lawsuit Settlement Agreement

The FDA, which denied any wrongdoing, said it will remove content warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 within 21 days. Plaintiffs called the settlement a big win for patients and the patient-physician relationship.

childrenshealthdefense.org

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agreed to take down its website and social media posts warning people not to use ivermectin to treat COVID-19 under terms of a settlement reached Thursday in a lawsuit alleging the agency exceeded its authority when it directed health professionals and patients not to use the drug.

Within 21 days, the agency will remove the consumer update, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” which pictures a doctor and a horse. The FDA posted the update on March 5, 2021.

The FDA webpage, still live, states repeatedly that the FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for treating COVID-19 and warns the drug can be “unsafe.” The page also includes language warning people not to use ivermectin “intended for livestock.”

The FDA will also delete social media posts from Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram posted in 2021 and 2022 with messages such as “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.””

Below: FDA post on Twitter implying that Ivermetin was only for livestock

A compendium of existing scientific literature on the use of Ivermectin for COVID, c19ivm.org, has long reported since the start of COVID that when Ivermectin is used:

“Statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant for higher quality studies. 61 studies from 55 independent teams in 25 different countries show statistically significant improvements.

Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 62% [51‑70%] and 85% [77‑90%] lower risk for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results for higher quality studies, primary outcomes, peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 61 of 101 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.”

When somebody uses that canard, "horse dewormer" line, ask them if they've drunk any engine coolant today.