We have recently seen in Volume V of a Senate Report that a number of rogue FBI Agents were probably used as a vehicle by Trump Administration opponents to generate a three year long phony story about Russia Collusion. Page 955 of the report reads as follows:
“While this Volume did not find evidence of collusion between President Trump and the Russians, it does detail a stunning accounting of the FBl’s sloppy work and poor judgment. In 2016, the Democratic Party, using a series of arm’s length transactions, hired a foreign citizen to seek out dirt on a political opponent, provided by foreign sources. This Volume confirms that Christopher Steele used information gained from sources in Russia-some with direct ties to the Russian Government. That unverified, uncorroborated, foreign information was then actively circulated with the press to disparage a U.S. political candidate.”
And here we are today, with an FBI Agent, suspiciously picking Brandon Straka out of a crowd of hundreds, and charging this high profile figure who has been a thorn in the side of the communist/socialist controlled democrat party leadership who started the Walkaway campaign which “. . . encourages and supports those on the Left to walk away from the divisive tenets endorsed and mandated by the Democratic Party of today . . . “
Seems pretty suspicious that, of all those who, without question, actually entered the building and engaged in the activities mentioned in the Complaint, Brandon Straka, from the video evidence, appears to have never crossed the line which defines criminal conduct and yet was singled out for prosecution.
After viewing the video mentioned in the FBI Agents complaint:
And then carefully reading the FBI Agent’s CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, I am left with the following questions which, as a jurist, I would certainly want answered.
A ___Where, in the video, is the evidence of Straka “impeding a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder”?
B ___What is the evidence of Straka " knowingly entering and remaining on restricted grounds" . . . keep in mind the “Capitol Grounds” were not closed to the public, and Straka is not reported to have entered the building.
C ___How did Straka “engage in disorderly conduct with intent to disturb a hearing before Congress” when he never entered the building and Brandon’s intent appears to be covering the event?
My personal opinion is, I think a 1st year criminal law student could easily get this case kicked out of court and have the FBI Agent reprimanded by the Court for bringing a frivolous case before the Court. The FBI’s action appears to be a classic case of a frivolous and malicious prosecution. But hey, I can only go by the video evidence and trumped up charges in the complaint.
JWK
The Latino walkaway movement is the socialist/communist controlled democrat leadership’s worse nightmare
“While this Volume did not find evidence of collusion between President Trump and the Russians, it does detail a stunning accounting of the FBl’s sloppy work and poor judgment. In 2016, the Democratic Party, using a series of arm’s length transactions, hired a foreign citizen to seek out dirt on a political opponent, provided by foreign sources. This Volume confirms that Christopher Steele used information gained from sources in Russia-some with direct ties to the Russian Government. That unverified, uncorroborated, foreign information was then actively circulated with the press to disparage a U.S. political candidate.”
And here we are today, with an FBI Agent, suspiciously picking Brandon Straka out of a crowd of hundreds, and charging this high profile figure who has been a thorn in the side of the communist/socialist controlled democrat party leadership who started the Walkaway campaign which “. . . encourages and supports those on the Left to walk away from the divisive tenets endorsed and mandated by the Democratic Party of today . . . “
Seems pretty suspicious that, of all those who, without question, actually entered the building and engaged in the activities mentioned in the Complaint, Brandon Straka, from the video evidence, appears to have never crossed the line which defines criminal conduct and yet was singled out for prosecution.
After viewing the video mentioned in the FBI Agents complaint:
And then carefully reading the FBI Agent’s CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, I am left with the following questions which, as a jurist, I would certainly want answered.
A ___Where, in the video, is the evidence of Straka “impeding a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder”?
B ___What is the evidence of Straka " knowingly entering and remaining on restricted grounds" . . . keep in mind the “Capitol Grounds” were not closed to the public, and Straka is not reported to have entered the building.
C ___How did Straka “engage in disorderly conduct with intent to disturb a hearing before Congress” when he never entered the building and Brandon’s intent appears to be covering the event?
My personal opinion is, I think a 1st year criminal law student could easily get this case kicked out of court and have the FBI Agent reprimanded by the Court for bringing a frivolous case before the Court. The FBI’s action appears to be a classic case of a frivolous and malicious prosecution. But hey, I can only go by the video evidence and trumped up charges in the complaint.
JWK
The Latino walkaway movement is the socialist/communist controlled democrat leadership’s worse nightmare