FBI Leaked To Wash Post / WSJ, Media Reported The Info, & The FBI Used The Stories As Evidence / Justification For The Raid - SSDD

[konradv]

This is some weapons-grade sanctimony and a serious lack of self-awareness.

I just know when somebody’s trying to get me to not pay attention to “the man behind the curtain”. Distraction is all Trump and his minions have now.

 

[marvin martian]

"We don’t need to read the docs; we’d just like to know that there’s more support for the report than the leak to The Washington Post that Trump had “classified documents relating to nuclear weapons.” Or more than the speculative rantings of Maggie Haberman on Twitter. Or more than the Wall Street Journal story leaked by the Feds in their tried-and-true continuous feedback loop.

This loop starts with leaks to the media, the media dutifully report them, and the FBI uses the stories as “evidence” in their warrant applications. See how that works? They pulled this trick in the Alfa-Bank, Steele Dossier Gretchen Whitmer, and Russian Collusion cases."

Former FBI Director admitted to leaking info to his college professor pal who then gave Comey's info to the media so that the Russia Collusion investigation could begin.

The FBI's use of media stories from their leaked propaganda / lies as evidence / Justification for needing search warrants and subpoenas is criminal, tactics for which the FISA Court has rebuked the FBI in the past.
(Such 'evidence' fails to meet the requirements to obtain FISA Court search / spying warrants, yet the FBI was caught doing it several times.)

Today the judge makes his decision on whether or not to allow everyone to see the affidavit, the reason he was given by the FBI to get the search warrant and why he approved it.

Personally, I am not going to hold my breath waiting for tge judge to order / approve the release of the affidavit.

BOMBSHELL: Outing of Trump Raid 'Leaker' Shatters FBI Document Excuse, Now All Eyes Are on Affidavit Hearing

pjmedia.com

This is the Steele Dossier scenario all over again.

 

[bripat9643]

I just know when somebody’s trying to get me to not pay attention to “the man behind the curtain”. Distraction is all Trump and his minions have now.

puhleeze. No one distracts more than the Dims and the fake nooze.

 

[konradv]

puhleeze. No one distracts more than the Dims and the fake nooze.

You seem to be ignoring Trump’s violation of espionage laws.

 

[bripat9643]

You seem to be ignoring Trump’s violation of espionage laws.

When was he convicted of that?

 

[easyt65]

I think it’s pretty obvious that Trump has been a danger to the security of the country through his laxness with regard to sensitive documents and dumb luck, if nothing was actually compromised. Be ready for days of distraction from the real crimes that were committed here

Much like yet far less than Hillary, or the leaking FBI who engaged in a failed coup attempt and illegally spied on Americans.


You partisan hatred and demented obsession with Trump that has led you and other snowflakes to defend proven criminals and traitors are far more dangerous than Trump has ever been closed to being.

 

[jc456]

They already listed statutes that they’re investigating violations of.

but those aren't illegal. why would they want to investigate what isn't a crime?

 

[jc456]

You seem to be ignoring Trump’s violation of espionage laws.

when?

 

[Marener]

but those aren't illegal. why would they want to investigate what isn't a crime?

Violating criminal statutes is illegal.

 

[easyt65]

but those aren't illegal. why would they want to investigate what isn't a crime?

Shhhhh. Democrat dupes get all excited when you say Trump 'violated' anything, illegal or not.

 

[easyt65]

Violating criminal statutes is illegal.

Seems like violating LEGAL statutes would be illegal but violating CRIMINAL statutes would be ok...

 

[jc456]

Violating criminal statutes is illegal.

if there are no statutes how can it be illegal?

 

[Marener]

Seems like violating LEGAL statutes would be illegal but violating CRIMINAL statutes would be ok...

There are statutes and they are listed in the warrant.

You are really slow.

 

[jc456]

There are statutes and they are listed in the warrant.

You are really slow.

not for a president. you're still struggling and so are they.

 

[easyt65]

if there are no statutes how can it be illegal?

Since laws don't apply to Democrats why don't we just make that apply to everyone? We would save a helluva lot of money on investigations, committee hearings, special Counsel salaries, etc...?!

 

[easyt65]

There are statutes and they are listed in the warrant.

You are really slow.

How did jc456's comment get credited to me?


____________

"Marener​

if there are no statutes how can it be illegal?"

Funny how that happened...

Hey Marener, were you 'doctoring' the post, switching me in for jc456?

 

[Marener]

not for a president. you're still struggling and so are they.

He’s not president.

 

[The Original Tree]

Why does this sound so familiar?

Operation Russian Collusion Crossfire Hurricane was started precisely in the same way.
The FBI and DOJ still refuse to give up the documents on it and are still in violation of a FEDERAL COURT ORDER to do so for the past two years.

 

[konradv]

when?

Right now!

 

[jc456]

He’s not president.

he was when those documents were created. So his. Executor. Look it up