heres where you have a problem with he lied under oath and thats why he was convicted because he lied ... the problem you have is you have done any research .... he was never convicted of lying under oath by any court ... I challenge you to find where he was in any court document ... he was convicted of giving misleading testimony and my friend thats not lying under oath thats giving misleading testimony when are you moron going to pull your heads out of your ass ...
Do you have a reading problem? Do you? Where did I say he was conflicted? I said the opposite. The sleazy democrats in congress didn't give a damn about his lying he almost skated. Except he did pay a huge out of court settlement and did lose his law license for five years, BECAUSE HE LIED UNDER OATH. Waving his finger in our collective faces and lying was bad enough but not impeachable, lying under oath, that is a problem.
it appears it is you with a reading problem ... I said CONVICTED NOT CONFLiCTED ... he was never CONVICTED of LYING UNDER OATH ...
back then, We all heard him say I never had sexual relations with that woman while wagging his finger ... the term sexual relations isn't oral sex ... its define back then as sexual intercourse ... so when Clinton was wagging that finger, saying he never had sexual relations with that woman, he was telling you the truth ... he wasn't lying to you ... it also appears that you have a reading problem and a comprehension problem ...this was a misleading testimony to many, because they didn't grasp the Idea that sexual intercourse and oral sex weren't sexual relations ...yes it was misleading , also when he said the same thing under oat it too was misleading ... in court misleading testimony isn't lying... look it up ... the judge allowed him to setttled with the court with misdemeanor by him giving misleading statements, as you said they took his license away for giving misleading testimoney in court and gave him 5 year probation from practicing law ... look it up !!!! there isn't any where in his plee agreement saying anything about lying under oath ... that was my point to many of your types make this false accusation he lied under oath... again I was replying to your false understanding where you stated "Bottom line, Clinton lied under oath and the left wing poo pooed"