FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[Delldude]

Nah. You lost the argument when you tried to claim the DoJ lied on the warrant for Mar a Lago and couldn’t back it up.

I never said that, prove I said that.

Loser.....

 

[AntonToo]

And so did Biden, but we don’t talk about that

No, no he didn't.

Nobody was chasing Biden around to return documents, his lawyers returned them voluntarily without anyone asking.

Nobody lied in the notorized statement that all documents were retuened, when they weren't.

Nobody had to raid his residence to get gov documents back,

Nobody was ordered to move document boxes around and erase security tapes to obstruct investigation.

How many years is it going to take you to learn fundamental differences here?

 

[AntonToo]

https://conservativebrief.com/bidens-fbi-2-97479/

​

Biden’s FBI Had No ‘Probable Cause’ To Raid Mar-a-Lago: Memos​

Rob, what the hell do you think the court issued a warrant for if not probable cause?

You seriously think it was AN ACCIDENT that durinng the raid there were documents recovered that the warrant was issued for?


Stop reading ludecrous horseshit and start using you head.

 

[Delldude]

No, no he didn't.

Nobody was chasing Biden around to return documents, his lawyers returned them voluntarily without anyone asking.

Nobody lied in the notorized statement that all documents were retuened, when they weren't.

Nobody had to raid his residence to get gov documents back,

Nobody was ordered to move document boxes around and erase security tapes to obstruct investigation.

How many years is it going to take you to learn fundamental differences here?

Biden stole classified documents.

 

[AntonToo]

Biden stole classified documents.

Cool story, good luck proving it to 12 jurors after Biden volantarily returned them without anyone even asking.

Proving that Trump stole them? Just play the tape of the degenerate mouthing off publicly about how government documents belong to him.

 

[progressive hunter]

Cool story, good luck proving it to 12 jurors after Biden volantarily returned them without anyone even asking.

Proving that Trump stole them? Just play the tape of the degenerate mouthing off publicly about how government documents belong to him.

possessing them was the crime for biden not returning them after 10 yrs when he gets caught,,

POTUS has authority to give himself any document he wishes,,

 

[Delldude]

You seriously think it was AN ACCIDENT that durinng the raid there were documents recovered that the warrant was issued for?

It was a non specific warrant.

Cool story, good luck proving it to 12 jurors after Biden volantarily returned them without anyone even asking.

Biden knowingly and voluntarily broke the law.
Trump didn't.
Even Bob Hur told him he should have known better.
But because Biden wasn't playing with a full deck, they chose not to prosecute.

 

[AntonToo]

possessing them was the crime for biden not returning them after 10 yrs when he gets caught,

Wrong, wrong again, stop making up bullshit and go read declination to prosecute.

Nobody gets prosecuted for mishandling without established intent. Not Biden, not Pence.

It takes a total degenerate like Trump to **** around with clear National Archives requests for documents for a year, to submit false official statements that everything was returned, to obstruct investigation and get caught red handed with highly classified national security documents.

 

[westwall]

That is just silly.

Warrant was granted by the court - meaning JUDGE who reviewed it DID find probable cause and whatever doubts anyone had were gone when illegally retained documents were confiscated at Mar-A-Lago.

Yes, you are silly. We've been discussing the lawfare waged against Trump for YEARS.

It might behoove you to pull your head out of your ass before it's too late.

 

[westwall]

That's a stupid, baseless fantasy.

Obama ordered a report on Russian meddling in election; there was nothing about arriving at any specific conclusions about Trump or anyone else.

It's a fact, and you're pissing up a rope.

 

[AntonToo]

It's a fact, and you're pissing up a rope.

Prove it bullshit peddler.

 

[Mick2]

Nobody gets prosecuted for mishandling without established intent. Not Biden, not Pence.

Guy, there is audio of Biden discussing the matter of the classified documents he had in his home with his ghost writer years ago. Of course there was f*cking intent. He knew he had them. Hur referenced this point and that audio.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes, you are silly. We've been discussing the lawfare waged against Trump for YEARS.

It might behoove you to pull your head out of your ass before it's too late.

Lawfare is when they raid your place, find nothing and try to prosecute you anyway.

Accountability is when you **** around with National Achive requests, lie about having returned everything and then get caught with boxes full of highly classified documents while obstructing investigation.

If you had any ******* clue you'd be able tell the difference.

 

[AntonToo]

Guy, there is audio of Biden discussing the matter of the classified documents he had in his home with his ghost writer years ago. Of course there was f*cking intent. He knew he had them. Hur referenced this point and that audio.

Guy, it's all in Hur's declination to prosecute, just READ IT.

How the ghostwriter of Biden's memoirs ended up in the center of a classified documents probe

President Joe Biden worked so closely with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer that he is accused of sharing government secrets with him.

apnews.com

 

[progressive hunter]

Wrong, wrong again, stop making up bullshit and go read declination to prosecute.

Nobody gets prosecuted for mishandling without established intent. Not Biden, not Pence.

It takes a total degenerate like Trump to **** around with clear National Archives requests for documents for a year, to submit false official statements that everything was returned, to obstruct investigation and get caught red handed with highly classified national security documents.

biden admitted his intent was to profit from the documents he was not legally allowed to have,,
also his crime was possession not what he intended to do with them, thats a whole other crime,,
FFS he had them as a private citizen in his unsecured garage and an office he was never at,,


a request has no legal authority,, and POTUS can declassify and give documents to who ever he wants to,,

 

[Mick2]

Guy, it's all in Hur's declination to prosecute, just READ IT.

How the ghostwriter of Biden's memoirs ended up in the center of a classified documents probe

President Joe Biden worked so closely with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer that he is accused of sharing government secrets with him.

apnews.com

Are you denying that Biden told his ghostwriter about the classified documents he had in possession? Mind you, this was BEFORE Biden was ever President and had the authority to declassify anything he wanted.

 

[AntonToo]

Are you denying that Biden told his ghostwriter about the classified documents he had in possession? Mind you, this was BEFORE Biden was ever President and had the authority to declassify anything he wanted.

I don't give a shit what half thoughts you have about it.

Hur had a job - to professionaly review all this and see if he could make a case beyond reasonable doubt before the jury in a court of law. He concluded that he could not and wrote a report for you to read.

You want to keep beliving Biden should've been prosecuted? Go ahead, make a thread about how Trump DOJ is failing to indict Biden instead of poluting this one with your irrelavant whataboutisms.

 

[Mick2]

I don't give a shit what half thoughts you have about it.

You being the half-twit at the top of the list.

Let's use the prosecutor's own words, not your words you goofy sob, on why the prosecutor didn't prosecute Biden for his crimes:

“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” Hur wrote.

“Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

Hur at no point says that Biden did't commit a crime that shouldn't be prosecuted.....or even suggest weak evidence. He's ENTIRE decision not to prosecute was pinned entirely on Biden being old, talking soft, and being highly confused and senile. Jurors would have a difficult time coming to a conviction in that mental and physical state.

Now waddle away to your insane la la land where you think Joe Biden didn't commit a crime. He certainly did. He got off because he was old and senile.


Mic drop!

 

[AntonToo]

Hur at no point says that Biden did't commit a crime that shouldn't be prosecuted

You are saying that Hur...in his DECLANATION TO PROSECUTE...doesn't say that Biden shouldn't be prosecuted.

That mic must've dropped on your head from a very tall building.

 

[Mick2]

You are saying that Hur...in his DECLANATION TO PROSECUTE...doesn't say that Biden shouldn't be prosecuted.

Your reading comprehension is 4 year old level, chump. I suggest you read Hur's words I quoted and then get back to us. You appear really stupid.