FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

[Marener]

Then why not go after Obama or Biden?

Obama never had presidential records let alone classified documents at home.

Biden was thoroughly investigated and Hur determined there was not enough evidence to press charges.

 

[Delldude]

He worked for Trump on his transition team.

And he made it all up......

 

[ThisIsMe]

No, no he didn't.

Nobody was chasing Biden around to return documents, his lawyers returned them voluntarily without anyone asking.

Nobody lied in the notorized statement that all documents were retuened, when they weren't.

Nobody had to raid his residence to get gov documents back,

Nobody was ordered to move document boxes around and erase security tapes to obstruct investigation.

How many years is it going to take you to learn fundamental differences here?

You all just want to skip to the end. You want to ignore that Biden had illegally taken the information in the first place, you want to ignore that he had them stored insecurely. You want to ignore that he had these documents, some, for over 30 years, and nobody ever came looking for them. You want to ignore that as a senator, he wasn’t allowed to take them out of the scif, but had them anyway. Somehow, as the left claims, they got accidentally packed up in his personal belongings as VP, which means they were lying around in accessible areas where staffers and aids, who probably didn’t have security clearances, were able to view them

Just because Biden didn’t put up a fight when they came looking for them doesn’t mean he didn’t not break the law by not returning them when he should have. Does nobody not even question how weird it was that when trump was discovered to have had classified documents that suddenly Biden also discovered he had documents? Strange isn’t it? Why is that?

Now there are stories coming out that the FBI felt they didn’t have probable cause to go after trump but Biden administration pushed to do it.

Also, regarding the declassification process, has anyone found the actual process a president has to go through to declassify? Considering his declassification authority is really broad?

 

[Nostra]

Read the judges ruling.

Of course you won't, and even if I post a link from CNN you'll complain about the link.

So just google your own copy.

Still no link.

 

[Marener]

You all just want to skip to the end. You want to ignore that Biden had illegally taken the information in the first place, you want to ignore that he had them stored insecurely. You want to ignore that he had these documents, some, for over 30 years, and nobody ever came looking for them. You want to ignore that as a senator, he wasn’t allowed to take them out of the scif, but had them anyway. Somehow, as the left claims, they got accidentally packed up in his personal belongings as VP, which means they were lying around in accessible areas where staffers and aids, who probably didn’t have security clearances, were able to view them

Just because Biden didn’t put up a fight when they came looking for them doesn’t mean he didn’t not break the law by not returning them when he should have. Does nobody not even question how weird it was that when trump was discovered to have had classified documents that suddenly Biden also discovered he had documents? Strange isn’t it? Why is that?

Now there are stories coming out that the FBI felt they didn’t have probable cause to go after trump but Biden administration pushed to do it.

Also, regarding the declassification process, has anyone found the actual process a president has to go through to declassify? Considering his declassification authority is really broad?

Everything you said was "ignored" is addressed in the Hur report which ultimately found that none of these issues could add up to a credible case against Biden.

None of it was ignored (some of it just isn't true), it was all carefully considered by a well respected nonpartisan career prosecutor.

 

[Nostra]

You don't understand what you are even talking about. Collusion is not a criminal concept.

When Trump Jr. met with Russian government representative to seek Clinton compromat, it's release timeline and sanctions - THATS COLLUSION,

But Hitlery paying Russia for false information to attack Trump isn’t collusion, right?

Remember when Mueller found=d no evidence of collusion? Good times.

 

[Nostra]

He worked for Trump on his transition team.

Transition team is assembled after the election, dumbass.

 

[Nostra]

They did go after Biden and Mike Pence. But they found they had no intent to retain any classified documents.

That isn’t a requirement to charge, idiot.

 

[Nostra]

Everything you said was "ignored" is addressed in the Hur report which ultimately found that none of these issues could add up to a credible case against Biden.

None of it was ignored (some of it just isn't true), it was all carefully considered by a well respected nonpartisan career prosecutor.

No liar, he said he didn’t charge Biden because he was too for gone to realize he was in a courtroom.

 

[Marener]

No liar, he said he didn’t charge Biden because he was too for gone to realize he was in a courtroom.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And then the raid uncovered precisely the evidence expected to be found and used as PC for the warrant.

So this thread can be left to rot like the turd it is.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Everything you said was "ignored" is addressed in the Hur report which ultimately found that none of these issues could add up to a credible case against Biden.

None of it was ignored (some of it just isn't true), it was all carefully considered by a well respected nonpartisan career prosecutor.

No, and once again, you are jumping to the end. The Hur report said they found that Biden had indeed broken the law. The report never claimed there was no credible evidence, in fact it stated that Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials.

The only reason they didn’t bring it to trial is because Hur thought the jury would be sympathetic to an elderly man with a poor memory.

 

[Marener]

No, and once again, you are jumping to the end. The Hur report said they found that Biden had indeed broken the law. The report never claimed there was no credible evidence, in fact it stated that Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials.

The only reason they didn’t bring it to trial is because Hur thought the jury would be sympathetic to an elderly man with a poor memory.

They didn't bring it to trial because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he willfully retained and disclosed classified material beyond a reasonable doubt.

Although there was some evidence to support charges, it was ultimately decided that the evidence was inadequate.

The Hur report didn't decide whether Biden broke the law or not. That's the job of a jury. Hur's job was to decide whether the evidence could support a prosecution. It didn't.

 

[AntonToo]

You all just want to skip to the end. You want to ignore that Biden had illegally taken the information in the first place, you want to ignore that he had them stored insecurely. You want to ignore that he had these documents, some, for over 30 years, and nobody ever came looking for them. You want to ignore that as a senator, he wasn’t allowed to take them out of the scif, but had them anyway. Somehow, as the left claims, they got accidentally packed up in his personal belongings as VP, which means they were lying around in accessible areas where staffers and aids, who probably didn’t have security clearances, were able to view them

Just because Biden didn’t put up a fight when they came looking for them doesn’t mean he didn’t not break the law by not returning them when he should have. Does nobody not even question how weird it was that when trump was discovered to have had classified documents that suddenly Biden also discovered he had documents? Strange isn’t it? Why is that?

Now there are stories coming out that the FBI felt they didn’t have probable cause to go after trump but Biden administration pushed to do it.

Also, regarding the declassification process, has anyone found the actual process a president has to go through to declassify? Considering his declassification authority is really broad?

Read your post and tell me which part of it refutes that Trump refused to return gov documents, lied about having returned them, that his house was raided by the book and that this search resulted in confiscation of highly classified gov documents.

If no part then go take your deflections, whataboutisms and complaints that Trump administration is not sufficiently prosecuting Biden to another thread.

 

[westwall]

Papadapolous was, in the end, a criminal convicted in a court of law for lying to investigators.

Papadalolous was convicted because he couldn't remember a small detail. He lied about nothing, but decided to plea to a minor crime before he was driven to bankruptcy.

 

[Failzero]

“FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal”​

FBI doubted probable cause for Mar-a-Lago raid but pushed forward amid pressure from Biden DOJ, emails reveal

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI did not believe it had probable cause to raid President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in 2022, but moved forward amid pressure from the Biden Justice Department.

www.foxnews.com

Lawfare Democrats like Garland need to pay a heavy price for their actions. These criminals cannot be allowed to continue with their Soviet style show trials.

This gettin out most likely cost Dan Bongino his job for forcing the Info out

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Papadalolous was convicted because he couldn't remember a small detail. He lied about nothing, but decided to plea to a minor crime before he was driven to bankruptcy.

Thats a dumb lie.

He admitted he lied.

Now youre a liar, too. Congrats.

 

[AntonToo]

Papadalolous was convicted because he couldn't remember a small detail. He lied about nothing, but decided to plea to a minor crime before he was driven to bankruptcy.

Papadapolous PLED GUILTY to lying.

He did not plead innocence based on not remembering something.

Papadopoulos said he realizes now that what he did was wrong.

"In January 2017, I made a terrible mistake for which I have paid dearly and I am terribly ashamed," he said. "My entire life has been turned upside down."

He added that he hoped to signal to other witnesses that "this investigation has global implications and the truth matters."

Federal Judge Randy Moss acknowledged the time and energy this had cost the government.

"It took six months before Mr. Papadopoulos corrected the record and he did so in the face of proof that he lied," he said. But the judge called the sentence he'd handed down on Friday appropriate.




When are you going to stop posting stupid bullshit already?

 

[postman]

But Hitlery paying Russia for false information to attack Trump isn’t collusion, right?

Remember when Mueller found=d no evidence of collusion? Good times.

Hillary didn't pay Russia.

And remember, it was the republicans who ordered the Steel Dossier.

 

[Nostra]

They didn't bring it to trial because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he willfully retained and disclosed classified material beyond a reasonable doubt.

Although there was some evidence to support charges, it was ultimately decided that the evidence was inadequate.

The Hur report didn't decide whether Biden broke the law or not. That's the job of a jury. Hur's job was to decide whether the evidence could support a prosecution. It didn't.

No, Biden was a vegetable and wouldn’t know WTF was going on.