FBI Document Shows Joe Biden Took $5M From Burisma As part of a Bribery Scheme

[Faun]

Your public display of pleading your hurt feelings doesn't help you like you want it to.

 

[Rambunctious]

Weak..... as usual....

 

[Hollie]

Your best posts are when you cut and paste cartoons..

 

[Delldude]

How do you know they sat on it for 3 years?

And the while tbe whistleblower isn't speculation, everything he or she told the FBI that was documented in that FD-1023 remains unverified.

The form is dated June 30, 2020..............

 

[Delldude]

again with the bullshit lying through omission?

sigh

"There's a confidential human source that the FBI works with who has proven to be very credible, who reported a conversation with someone else. That confidential human source said that he had no way of knowing about the underlying veracity of the things he was being told.

It's not the source's information, it is the information that he reported from a conversation with someone else that he was not able to verify or authenticate.

That's why we're talking about second-hand hearsay here.

And so it is not the confidential human source who is the origin of the particular claim.

That source is the person who reported that someone else was saying this. And that is why this task force was created that examined it, and they determined there was no reason to move up the chain of investigative procedures."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/06/05/raskin_fbi_document_that_comer_is_talking_about_it_second-hand_hearsay.html

"There's a confidential human source that the FBI works with who has proven to be very credible, who reported a conversation with someone else. That confidential human source said that he had no way of knowing about the underlying veracity of the things he was being told.

It's not the source's information, it is the information that he reported from a conversation with someone else that he was not able to verify or authenticate.

That's why we're talking about second-hand hearsay here.

And so it is not the confidential human source who is the origin of the particular claim.

That source is the person who reported that someone else was saying this. And that is why this task force was created that examined it, and they determined there was no reason to move up the chain of investigative procedures."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/06/05/raskin_fbi_document_that_comer_is_talking_about_it_second-hand_hearsay.html

Rep. Jamie Raskin....................already caught lying about the 1023......

EXCLUSIVE: Bill Barr Confirms Rep. Jamie Raskin Lied About Biden Family Corruption Investigation​

EXCLUSIVE: Barr Confirms Raskin Lied About Biden Bribery Probe

'It’s not true. It wasn’t closed down,' Barr said of an investigation into a CHS's allegation that Biden had agreed to a $5 million bribe.

thefederalist.com

 

[Delldude]

Grassley thrives on innuendo. His judiciary report was debunked.

Link or bullshit?

Grassley thrives on innuendo. His judiciary report was debunked

None of that proves Joe Biden has done anything illegal. '

Yet

Lot's of conclusions drawn, not on hard proof but suspicion.

Yet

This is why Garland hasn't assigned an SC for the laptop.

No shit, he helped Biden get elected, why would 'they' do anything to unseat him?

 

[Rumpole]

Link or bullshit?

FBI Document Shows Joe Biden Took $5M From Burisma As part of a Bribery Scheme

Your public display of pleading your hurt feelings doesn't help you like you want it to. :boohoo:

www.usmessageboard.com

Yet

You haven't fornicated with a porn star and paid her hush money

Yet.

Yet

You haven't taken a $10 million bribe


Yet

No shit, he helped Biden get elected, why would 'they' do anything to unseat him?

Garland has ruled twice in Trump's favor in various litigation.

Garland has allowed the Trump appointed US ATTorney Delaware, appointed by Bill Barr to investigate Hunter Biden, to continue unabated, as did Biden didn't fire him when he first took over the office, noting that it is customary for a new administration to fire all the US Attorneys and replace with his own team.

Garland assigned a Special Counsel to investigate Biden's documents.

Therefore, there is no evidence to impugn the integrity of Garland or Biden. Your comment is dismissed.

 

[Delldude]

FBI Document Shows Joe Biden Took $5M From Burisma As part of a Bribery Scheme

Your public display of pleading your hurt feelings doesn't help you like you want it to. :boohoo:

www.usmessageboard.com

You haven't fornicated with a porn star and paid her hush money

Yet.

You haven't taken a $10 million bribe


Yet

Garland has ruled twice in Trump's favor in various litigation.

Garland has allowed the Trump appointed US ATTorney Delaware, appointed by Bill Barr to investigate Hunter Biden, to continue unabated, as did Biden didn't fire him when he first took over the office, noting that it is customary for a new administration to fire all the US Attorneys and replace with his own team.

Garland assigned a Special Counsel to investigate Biden's documents.

Therefore, there is no evidence to impugn the integrity of Garland or Biden. Your comment is dismissed.

Red herring.....LOL

 

[Delldude]

Therefore, there is no evidence to impugn the integrity of Garland or Biden. Your comment is dismissed.

Get back to your handlers.......

 

[Rumpole]

Wray is simply an errand boy for Biden. You somehow missed it but Wray doesn't work under the Trump administration.

Incompetent rebuttal; ad homs have no argumentative value.

 

[Delldude]

Incompetent rebuttal; ad homs have no argumentative value.

How's the revelation on some 17 odd tapes of the Biden's compromising themselves and an asst FBI deputy director not wanting to talk about it.....LOL

 

[Rumpole]

That's exactly what needs to happen... I've thought this way for quite a while now. Otherwise is there not a "fail stop" when the nation succumbs to a tyrannical failed government ??

If not, then why not ? I mean I bet that the leftist damned sure wished that there would have been a fail stop, otherwise if they new that they were 100% right about Trump. Right ? In their case they'd be wrong about Trump, just as they've been proven wrong everytime they came at Trump, but that doesn't matter to them.

Now if the Republican majority is right about Biden being compromised, and this all due to alledged bribes being taken, then yes a fail safe method to protect the nation should be activated of course. The 25th amendment would be a great starting point.

There is no conclusive proof that Biden received a bribe or money from his son's dealings.

 

[Rumpole]

How's the revelation on some 17 odd tapes of the Biden's compromising themselves and an asst FBI deputy director not wanting to talk about it.....LOL

Well, put up or shut up. I'll be waiting.

 

[Delldude]

Well, put up or shut up. I'll be waiting.

CSPAN hearing......LOL

Your handlers didn't brief you?

 

[Faun]

The form is dated June 30, 2020..............

That's not actually evidence they sat on it for 3 years. Could also mean there's been no further intel on that subject matter in 3 years.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

And you wonder why Democrats hold the right in contempt. There is no evidence of that. Your mind is in the gutter.

Trump has to pay $5 million, he was held liable for sex abuse and defamation, not to mention
he has been accused by 25 women of sex abuse, one was a child who claim he raped her with Epstein, and we have
photos of Trump hanging out with Epstein, we have tape of Trump bragging about sexually harassing and abusing women and another tape of him bragging about barging into teen pageant participant's dressing rooms in their various stages of dress because 'he owns the place and has a right to'.

Your fake outrage is noted.

And yet sockpuppet you and idiot for all don’t want to talk about the Photos of Clinton with Epstein,the fact clinton was on the flight logs of Epstein’s private jet and trump was not,nor the picture found at Epstein’s house with clinton dressed in a woman’s dress or the photo of with him maxwell boarding Epstein’s jet,nor all the documented cases of women coming out way before clinton was potus talking about him raping them,all the Arkansas state troopers that witnessed his cocaine drug parties and all those women you mention on trump you mention just came out of nowhere when trump was potus where women claimed harassment from Clinton was before he was president abusing them,

You never talk about the corruption of the Dems or all the things clinton did you accuse trump of that no e hard evidence ever emerged of yet ignore all the hundreds of people connected to clinton who got arkansawed off fir knowing too much.

You have been exposed fir the dnc paid shill you are.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Yes, and you impugn the character of Joe Biden

without evidence.

Hypocrite.

Your nose continues to grow miles long in every post everytime you fart same as Biden and Clinton’s HYPOCRITE sockpuppet from Langley.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

They impeached Trump on actual evidence.

No evidence has been provided anywhere that Joe Biden did anything illegal.

How do you say that with a strait face.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Incompetent rebuttal; unsubstantive lazy retorts do not merit a proper response.

Kinda like all of your posts.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Okay, he's a sex abuser. that better?

Now, repeat after me:

Trump is a sex abuser, conman, fraudster, criminal who loves Putin, the 'poorly educated', not to mention that he despises democracy and has betrayed America
Suck on this:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.3.0.pdf

YOU just described biden to the tee.