FBI Director DOUBTS San Bernardino Massacre was ISIS Inspired

[Contumacious]

Many observers found it odd that so many law enforcement officers converged on the scene, so quickly, so well-equipped. Law enforcement had armored vehicles, robots and a huge officer presence on the scene very rapidly. If that was par for the course in this age of terrorism, then that is great news. However, many have asked if there was some advance notice, or if it was merely a coincidence that SWAT training exercises were being conducted nearby, which is the police chief’s explanation.

They weren't fast enough, the shooters were already gone.

Think about this. Two people shot 35 people, and escaped unnoticed by the police. They then disappear for four hours.



What ever happened to " we shall respond within 4 minutes and will not wait for the SWAT team?!?!?!?!?

 

[Contumacious]

So if this was planned by our gvt to scare the pajesus out of us, was Obama NOT in the KNOW, not informed and that's why he is playing it down?

This conspiracy makes no sense?

And the FBI Comey SAYING THERE WAS NO SOCIAL MEDIA posts, only private messages, how does that play in to this conspiracy theory?

At this point in time we are demanding that they answer our questions and provide the EVIDENCE.


I REFUSE TO TAKE THE GOVERNMENT'S VERSION AS GOSPEL TRUTH.

LIBERTARIANS LIKE TO QUESTION AUTHORITY

 

[OKTexas]

Many observers found it odd that so many law enforcement officers converged on the scene, so quickly, so well-equipped. Law enforcement had armored vehicles, robots and a huge officer presence on the scene very rapidly. If that was par for the course in this age of terrorism, then that is great news. However, many have asked if there was some advance notice, or if it was merely a coincidence that SWAT training exercises were being conducted nearby, which is the police chief’s explanation.

They weren't fast enough, the shooters were already gone.

Think about this. Two people shot 35 people, and escaped unnoticed by the police. They then disappear for four hours.



What ever happened to " we shall respond within 4 minutes and will not wait for the SWAT team?!?!?!?!?

Shooting had already started before the response clock, it doesn't take long to shoot that many people, especially when they are most likely huddled together and many rounds probably got penetration on more than one person.

 

[Contumacious]

Many observers found it odd that so many law enforcement officers converged on the scene, so quickly, so well-equipped. Law enforcement had armored vehicles, robots and a huge officer presence on the scene very rapidly. If that was par for the course in this age of terrorism, then that is great news. However, many have asked if there was some advance notice, or if it was merely a coincidence that SWAT training exercises were being conducted nearby, which is the police chief’s explanation.

They weren't fast enough, the shooters were already gone.

Think about this. Two people shot 35 people, and escaped unnoticed by the police. They then disappear for four hours.



What ever happened to " we shall respond within 4 minutes and will not wait for the SWAT team?!?!?!?!?

Shooting had already started before the response clock, it doesn't take long to shoot that many people, especially when they are most likely huddled together and many rounds probably got penetration on more than one person.

Watch this video. There is an introduction by a reporter, then the video. As the SUV drives slowly down the street, the driver is turning the headlights off and on. Why? There is no shooting at this point. The SUV passes by. Then the shooting starts.


The post-shootout photo of the SUV shows the windshield riddled with bullet holes. These bullet holes came from in front of the SUV. The media report says this: they fired 76 rounds, while police fired 380.

Who did the counting? When? Who verified this?

How did they shoot at police from inside the SUV? For how long? How long would it take to fire 76 rounds with semi-automatics? This time includes replacing empty clips. We are supposed to believe that it took 380 rounds to kill them. If so, these are not sharpshooters.

The two are dead. So, there is no legal liability for naming them the killers. There is no “alleged” visible in the media. This ends all discussion. Of course they acted alone. Everyone knows this.

 

[Rustic]

Was The San Bernardino Massacre Really ISIS-Inspired?


****************

And I doubt weather the massacre was committed by Tashfeen Malik, and/or Syed Farook.

No building surveillance or dashcam videos.


Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


I smell a scam so gun grabbers can introduce legislation banning "assault" type rifles.


.

Too bad the dumbass progressives have no clue what a real assault weapon is.

 

[Contumacious]

Was The San Bernardino Massacre Really ISIS-Inspired?


****************

And I doubt weather the massacre was committed by Tashfeen Malik, and/or Syed Farook.

No building surveillance or dashcam videos.


Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


I smell a scam so gun grabbers can introduce legislation banning "assault" type rifles.


.

Too bad the dumbass progressives have no clue what a real assault weapon is.

They want to ban "assault" weapons using any means necessary.


.

 

[Rustic]

Assault weapon...

 

[Contumacious]

Assault weapon...

BEFORE Pearl Harbor Americans were opposed to join the world war , after the attack they approved of the US entering WWII. So these motherfuckers are experts at manipulating public opinion.


.

 

[Katzndogz]

Many observers found it odd that so many law enforcement officers converged on the scene, so quickly, so well-equipped. Law enforcement had armored vehicles, robots and a huge officer presence on the scene very rapidly. If that was par for the course in this age of terrorism, then that is great news. However, many have asked if there was some advance notice, or if it was merely a coincidence that SWAT training exercises were being conducted nearby, which is the police chief’s explanation.

It wasn't a coincidence. The training center was always conducting training exercises.

 

[OKTexas]

Many observers found it odd that so many law enforcement officers converged on the scene, so quickly, so well-equipped. Law enforcement had armored vehicles, robots and a huge officer presence on the scene very rapidly. If that was par for the course in this age of terrorism, then that is great news. However, many have asked if there was some advance notice, or if it was merely a coincidence that SWAT training exercises were being conducted nearby, which is the police chief’s explanation.

They weren't fast enough, the shooters were already gone.

Think about this. Two people shot 35 people, and escaped unnoticed by the police. They then disappear for four hours.



What ever happened to " we shall respond within 4 minutes and will not wait for the SWAT team?!?!?!?!?

Shooting had already started before the response clock, it doesn't take long to shoot that many people, especially when they are most likely huddled together and many rounds probably got penetration on more than one person.

Watch this video. There is an introduction by a reporter, then the video. As the SUV drives slowly down the street, the driver is turning the headlights off and on. Why? There is no shooting at this point. The SUV passes by. Then the shooting starts.


The post-shootout photo of the SUV shows the windshield riddled with bullet holes. These bullet holes came from in front of the SUV. The media report says this: they fired 76 rounds, while police fired 380.

Who did the counting? When? Who verified this?

How did they shoot at police from inside the SUV? For how long? How long would it take to fire 76 rounds with semi-automatics? This time includes replacing empty clips. We are supposed to believe that it took 380 rounds to kill them. If so, these are not sharpshooters.

The two are dead. So, there is no legal liability for naming them the killers. There is no “alleged” visible in the media. This ends all discussion. Of course they acted alone. Everyone knows this.

Why did he flash his lights, maybe to signal to the vehicles ahead to get out of the way? No one will know for sure. As for who shot how many rounds, that's determined by the ballistics lab from ejector markings on the casings and police inventories. Also the shooting started just as the suv passed in front of the camera, I'm assuming that's when she started shooting out the back of the suv at the cops.

 

[Contumacious]

Many observers found it odd that so many law enforcement officers converged on the scene, so quickly, so well-equipped. Law enforcement had armored vehicles, robots and a huge officer presence on the scene very rapidly. If that was par for the course in this age of terrorism, then that is great news. However, many have asked if there was some advance notice, or if it was merely a coincidence that SWAT training exercises were being conducted nearby, which is the police chief’s explanation.

They weren't fast enough, the shooters were already gone.

Think about this. Two people shot 35 people, and escaped unnoticed by the police. They then disappear for four hours.



What ever happened to " we shall respond within 4 minutes and will not wait for the SWAT team?!?!?!?!?

Shooting had already started before the response clock, it doesn't take long to shoot that many people, especially when they are most likely huddled together and many rounds probably got penetration on more than one person.

Watch this video. There is an introduction by a reporter, then the video. As the SUV drives slowly down the street, the driver is turning the headlights off and on. Why? There is no shooting at this point. The SUV passes by. Then the shooting starts.


The post-shootout photo of the SUV shows the windshield riddled with bullet holes. These bullet holes came from in front of the SUV. The media report says this: they fired 76 rounds, while police fired 380.

Who did the counting? When? Who verified this?

How did they shoot at police from inside the SUV? For how long? How long would it take to fire 76 rounds with semi-automatics? This time includes replacing empty clips. We are supposed to believe that it took 380 rounds to kill them. If so, these are not sharpshooters.

The two are dead. So, there is no legal liability for naming them the killers. There is no “alleged” visible in the media. This ends all discussion. Of course they acted alone. Everyone knows this.

Why did he flash his lights, maybe to signal to the vehicles ahead to get out of the way? No one will know for sure. As for who shot how many rounds, that's determined by the ballistics lab from ejector markings on the casings and police inventories. Also the shooting started just as the suv passed in front of the camera, I'm assuming that's when she started shooting out the back of the suv at the cops.

Meanwhile we are supposed to believe that Enrique Marquez, this goofy looking son of a bitch , bought two AR-15's?!?!?!?!?!?

BULLSHIT.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Farook was radicalized before 2010, before ISIS was much of an 'item'.

 

[Contumacious]

Farook was radicalized before 2010, before ISIS was much of an 'item'.

Again, that is pure bullshit.

In 2010 ISIS was known as ALQaeda and in Syria it was known as the Syrian Resistance.


If you find a historical document referring to ISIS in 2010 post it.


.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Farook was radicalized before 2010, before ISIS was much of an 'item'.

Again, that is pure bullshit.

In 2010 ISIS was known as ALQaeda and in Syria it was known as the Syrian Resistance.


If you find a historical document referring to ISIS in 2010 post it.


.

I have no idea what you're talking about, which at this point is probably one of the few things you and I have in common.

 

[Contumacious]

Farook was radicalized before 2010, before ISIS was much of an 'item'.

Again, that is pure bullshit.

In 2010 ISIS was known as ALQaeda and in Syria it was known as the Syrian Resistance.


If you find a historical document referring to ISIS in 2010 post it.


.

I have no idea what you're talking about, which at this point is probably one of the few things you and I have in common.

OK, how did you conclude that he was radicalized?

And if he was radicalized, it was not by Dae'sh/ISIS, which at the time did not exist.


.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Any doubt the director has is based on the White Houses insistence that ISIS is contained. Remember when they were the "JV team" ?

 

[mikegriffith1]

Humm, well, I wonder how he would explain the fact that Farook told his dad that he supported ISIS and the fact that Malik pledged allegiance to ISIS on Facebook.

 

[Meathead]

I think they were upset because Molly & Mike was cancelled.

 

[TooTall]

"Marquez" !? BAN ALL HISPANICS !!

HUH?


WTF?

Did they ban all white folks after DAHMER, GACY, Bundy, Bush II?


.

It's called sarcasm . I'm mocking the right wing.

"Marquez" !? BAN ALL HISPANICS !!

HUH?


WTF?

Did they ban all white folks after DAHMER, GACY, Bundy, Bush II?


.

It's called sarcasm . I'm mocking the right wing.

You are trying to mock, but all you are doing is showing your ignorance.

 

[TooTall]

Has any of the government controlled media asked the powers-that-be WHY there are No building surveillance or dashcam videos.??

soooo, you are implying two innocent people were driving down a San Bernardino street with an arsenal in their car and the cops just murdered them just because those two muslimes couldn't wait to start shooting up the town, after they killed 14 people.

are you an idiot or just stupid

He is both!