FBI Dealt Blow By DC Judge; Must Address Measures Taken To Verify Steele Dossier

[Geaux4it]

This should be good

-Geaux
-----------------------

The FBI has been dealt a major blow after a Washington DC judge ruled that the agency must respond to a FOIA request for documents concerning the bureau's efforts to verify the controversial Steele Dossier, before it was used as the foundation of a FISA surveillance warrant application and subsequent renewals.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta - who in January sided with the FBI's decision to ignore the FOIA request, said that President Trump's release of two House Intelligence Committee documents (the "Nunes" and "Schiff" memos) changed everything.

Judge Amit Mehta
Considering that the FBI offered Steele $50,000 to verify the Dossier's claims yet never paid him, BuzzFeed has unsuccessfully tried to do the same to defend themselves in a dossier-related lawsuit, and a $50 million Soros-funded investigation to continue the hunt have turned up nothing that we know of - whatever documents the FBI may be forced to cough up regarding their attempts to verify the Dossier could prove highly embarrassing for the agency.

f Mr. Steele could get solid corroboration of his reports, the F.B.I. would pay him $50,000 for his efforts, according to two people familiar with the offer. Ultimately, he was not paid. -NYT

What's more, forcing the FBI to prove they had an empty hand will likely embolden calls to disband the special counsel investigation- as the agency's mercenary and politicized approach to "investigations" will be laid all the more bare for the world to see. Then again, who knows - maybe the FBI verified everything in the dossier and it simply hasn't leaked.

FBI Dealt Blow By DC Judge; Must Address Measures Taken To Verify Steele Dossier

 

[Weatherman2020]

Crank up the shredders and massive hard drive failures resulting in their destruction.

 

[playtime]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

 

[JakeStarkey]

zerohedge is fake news. Those who know its reputation enable fake news lying.

The FOIA request will squashed higher up the appellate chain.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

 

[CrusaderFrank]

zerohedge is fake news. Those who know its reputation enable fake news lying.

The FOIA request will squashed higher up the appellate chain.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

 

[playtime]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

 

[Stratford57]

 

[mudwhistle]

Crank up the shredders and massive hard drive failures resulting in their destruction.

All of that stuff has been flown to Little Rock Arkansas.

 

[MisterBeale]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

Actually, it happened, but then they went after the personal attorney.

This is sort of old news.

Trump Lawyer Cohen Drops Suits Against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS
BLOOMBERG


And Geaux's claim that the court ruling happened? If you don't trust Zero hedge and you want to attack the source? (A poisoning the well fallacy,) That's fine, but it is easy to do a search to find out if they are lying. Politico has the same court ruling on record, it is real.

Sorry, the story IS TRUE.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000161-9b8b-da6b-ade9-ffbfa8ff0000

 

[CrusaderFrank]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House.

Trump will use this to wipe out the seditious democrat Party this fall

 

[Hellokitty]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

If we hold the FBI Steel Dossier to the standards of Media Bias/Fact Check it would get the same rating as Zero Hedge would it not?

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information,

 

[2aguy]

This should be good

-Geaux
-----------------------

The FBI has been dealt a major blow after a Washington DC judge ruled that the agency must respond to a FOIA request for documents concerning the bureau's efforts to verify the controversial Steele Dossier, before it was used as the foundation of a FISA surveillance warrant application and subsequent renewals.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta - who in January sided with the FBI's decision to ignore the FOIA request, said that President Trump's release of two House Intelligence Committee documents (the "Nunes" and "Schiff" memos) changed everything.

Judge Amit Mehta
Considering that the FBI offered Steele $50,000 to verify the Dossier's claims yet never paid him, BuzzFeed has unsuccessfully tried to do the same to defend themselves in a dossier-related lawsuit, and a $50 million Soros-funded investigation to continue the hunt have turned up nothing that we know of - whatever documents the FBI may be forced to cough up regarding their attempts to verify the Dossier could prove highly embarrassing for the agency.

f Mr. Steele could get solid corroboration of his reports, the F.B.I. would pay him $50,000 for his efforts, according to two people familiar with the offer. Ultimately, he was not paid. -NYT

What's more, forcing the FBI to prove they had an empty hand will likely embolden calls to disband the special counsel investigation- as the agency's mercenary and politicized approach to "investigations" will be laid all the more bare for the world to see. Then again, who knows - maybe the FBI verified everything in the dossier and it simply hasn't leaked.

FBI Dealt Blow By DC Judge; Must Address Measures Taken To Verify Steele Dossier

It is about time. Also, they need to drag in rosenstein, comey, mccabe, lynch and all the obama minions who signed those FISA warrant petitions to the federal judges so they can be thrown in jail for lying to a federal judge.

 

[Dragonlady]

This should be good

-Geaux
-----------------------

The FBI has been dealt a major blow after a Washington DC judge ruled that the agency must respond to a FOIA request for documents concerning the bureau's efforts to verify the controversial Steele Dossier, before it was used as the foundation of a FISA surveillance warrant application and subsequent renewals.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta - who in January sided with the FBI's decision to ignore the FOIA request, said that President Trump's release of two House Intelligence Committee documents (the "Nunes" and "Schiff" memos) changed everything.

Judge Amit Mehta
Considering that the FBI offered Steele $50,000 to verify the Dossier's claims yet never paid him, BuzzFeed has unsuccessfully tried to do the same to defend themselves in a dossier-related lawsuit, and a $50 million Soros-funded investigation to continue the hunt have turned up nothing that we know of - whatever documents the FBI may be forced to cough up regarding their attempts to verify the Dossier could prove highly embarrassing for the agency.

f Mr. Steele could get solid corroboration of his reports, the F.B.I. would pay him $50,000 for his efforts, according to two people familiar with the offer. Ultimately, he was not paid. -NYT

What's more, forcing the FBI to prove they had an empty hand will likely embolden calls to disband the special counsel investigation- as the agency's mercenary and politicized approach to "investigations" will be laid all the more bare for the world to see. Then again, who knows - maybe the FBI verified everything in the dossier and it simply hasn't leaked.

FBI Dealt Blow By DC Judge; Must Address Measures Taken To Verify Steele Dossier

If true, and since it’s Zero Hedge, odds are it isn’t, it does not mean what you think it means. And its not the FBI who is going to be shitting themselves.

It appears that your joy is based on the belief that the FBI never paid Steele, proving the Dossier was never verified. Survey says: WRONG.

Steele was hired as an FBI source. Sources don’t provide verification on their own intel. Agents confirm intel not sources. If the source is lying, he can probably fake a document to support his lie. When intel is verified, that means that the FBI has investigated the information provided and has confirmed what the source told them.

You also seem to think that Dossier has never been verified. Survey says: WRONG.

Trump denounced the Steele dossier as fake, but many of its contents are turning out to be true

Since this piece was published, it had been confirmed that Michael Cohen did indeed go to Prague. Cohen had launched two defamation suits over this allegation and after proof was published, quietly withdrew them. That leaves the Pee Tape.

Two strikes. One more wrong answer and you’re out of the game.

You appear to believe that the FBI doesn’t want to respond to the FOI request because they used unverified information and they’ve been caught. Survey says: WRONG

The FBI doesn’t want their sources or methods revealed. Once they’re outed, they can no longer be used as sources. Their cover is blown and their lives are endangered.

That’s three strikes. You’re out of the game. As a consolation prize, you can pick up a MAGA hat on your way out the door for $20. Thank you for playing.

 

[2aguy]

This should be good

-Geaux
-----------------------

The FBI has been dealt a major blow after a Washington DC judge ruled that the agency must respond to a FOIA request for documents concerning the bureau's efforts to verify the controversial Steele Dossier, before it was used as the foundation of a FISA surveillance warrant application and subsequent renewals.

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta - who in January sided with the FBI's decision to ignore the FOIA request, said that President Trump's release of two House Intelligence Committee documents (the "Nunes" and "Schiff" memos) changed everything.

Judge Amit Mehta
Considering that the FBI offered Steele $50,000 to verify the Dossier's claims yet never paid him, BuzzFeed has unsuccessfully tried to do the same to defend themselves in a dossier-related lawsuit, and a $50 million Soros-funded investigation to continue the hunt have turned up nothing that we know of - whatever documents the FBI may be forced to cough up regarding their attempts to verify the Dossier could prove highly embarrassing for the agency.

f Mr. Steele could get solid corroboration of his reports, the F.B.I. would pay him $50,000 for his efforts, according to two people familiar with the offer. Ultimately, he was not paid. -NYT

What's more, forcing the FBI to prove they had an empty hand will likely embolden calls to disband the special counsel investigation- as the agency's mercenary and politicized approach to "investigations" will be laid all the more bare for the world to see. Then again, who knows - maybe the FBI verified everything in the dossier and it simply hasn't leaked.

FBI Dealt Blow By DC Judge; Must Address Measures Taken To Verify Steele Dossier

If true, and since it’s Zero Hedge, odds are it isn’t, it does not mean what you think it means. And its not the FBI who is going to be shitting themselves.

It appears that your joy is based on the belief that the FBI never paid Steele, proving the Dossier was never verified. Survey says: WRONG.

Steele was hired as an FBI source. Sources don’t provide verification on their own intel. Agents confirm intel not sources. If the source is lying, he can probably fake a document to support his lie. When intel is verified, that means that the FBI has investigated the information provided and has confirmed what the source told them.

You also seem to think that Dossier has never been verified. Survey says: WRONG.

Trump denounced the Steele dossier as fake, but many of its contents are turning out to be true

Since this piece was published, it had been confirmed that Michael Cohen did indeed go to Prague. Cohen had launched two defamation suits over this allegation and after proof was published, quietly withdrew them. That leaves the Pee Tape.

Two strikes. One more wrong answer and you’re out of the game.

You appear to believe that the FBI doesn’t want to respond to the FOI request because they used unverified information and they’ve been caught. Survey says: WRONG

The FBI doesn’t want their sources or methods revealed. Once they’re outed, they can no longer be used as sources. Their cover is blown and their lives are endangered.

That’s three strikes. You’re out of the game. As a consolation prize, you can pick up a MAGA hat on your way out the door for $20. Thank you for playing.

That is the whole freaking point.... the FBI did not verify the information before they gave it to a judge to get the FISA warrants...they lied to the judge.... they also lied when they told the judge that other news sources found the same information INDEPENDENTLY, from FBI..... those news sources were also using the Steele dossier and the FBI knew it.... they lied again....

The entire leadership of the FBI and the Department of Justice lied to Federal Judges about the source of the Steele dossier and they lied about verifying the information....anyone who signed off on those warrants presented to those judges committed felony...

 

[playtime]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House.

Trump will use this to wipe out the seditious democrat Party this fall

you think i am jake? silly you.

 

[playtime]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

Actually, it happened, but then they went after the personal attorney.

This is sort of old news.

Trump Lawyer Cohen Drops Suits Against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS
BLOOMBERG


And Geaux's claim that the court ruling happened? If you don't trust Zero hedge and you want to attack the source? (A poisoning the well fallacy,) That's fine, but it is easy to do a search to find out if they are lying. Politico has the same court ruling on record, it is real.

Sorry, the story IS TRUE.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000161-9b8b-da6b-ade9-ffbfa8ff0000

i am saying that there was a CONspiracy that it was a set up to try & stop trump from getting the whitehouse & hillary is somehow behind it all.

 

[playtime]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

If we hold the FBI Steel Dossier to the standards of Media Bias/Fact Check it would get the same rating as Zero Hedge would it not?

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information,

lol...

 

[MisterBeale]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

Actually, it happened, but then they went after the personal attorney.

This is sort of old news.

Trump Lawyer Cohen Drops Suits Against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS
BLOOMBERG


And Geaux's claim that the court ruling happened? If you don't trust Zero hedge and you want to attack the source? (A poisoning the well fallacy,) That's fine, but it is easy to do a search to find out if they are lying. Politico has the same court ruling on record, it is real.

Sorry, the story IS TRUE.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000161-9b8b-da6b-ade9-ffbfa8ff0000

i am saying that there was a CONspiracy that it was a set up to try & stop trump from getting the whitehouse & hillary is somehow behind it all.

Wow, does it matter who is behind it?

Look at your fecking signature. If you know the truth, why feed into lies?

 

[playtime]

zerohedge?


dismissed.

Jake, it happened. You can't dismiss it like a poll showing that Trump has no path to the White House

Zero Hedge
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:

CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

History

Launched in 2009, Zero Hedge is a finance blog founded by Colin Lokey also known with the pseudonym “Tyler Durden,” Daniel Ivandjiiski, and Tim Backshall. According to a Bloomberg Interview the Zero Hedge founders/authors were anonymous until 2016. A Professional Service Subscription is required to read the rest of the interview from Bloomberg, however a New Yorker article also covered their history.

Zero Hedge wrote a rebuttal article regarding the Bloomberg interview that can be found here. A quote from the rebuttal reads: “Zero Hedge hired Colin when he approached us over a year ago begging for a job after he was fired with cause from Seeking Alpha, following a fight with a co-worker.”

Funded by / Ownership

The website is registered in Bulgaria under the name Georgi Georgiev, a business partner of Krassimir Ivandjiiski.

According to Rationalwiki the only writer “conclusively” identified is “Dan Ivandjiiski, who conducts public interviews on behalf of Zero Hedge.” The blog generates revenue from online advertising.
[...]

Zero Hedge - Media Bias/Fact Check



dis...



missed.

Actually, it happened, but then they went after the personal attorney.

This is sort of old news.

Trump Lawyer Cohen Drops Suits Against BuzzFeed, Fusion GPS
BLOOMBERG


And Geaux's claim that the court ruling happened? If you don't trust Zero hedge and you want to attack the source? (A poisoning the well fallacy,) That's fine, but it is easy to do a search to find out if they are lying. Politico has the same court ruling on record, it is real.

Sorry, the story IS TRUE.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000161-9b8b-da6b-ade9-ffbfa8ff0000

i am saying that there was a CONspiracy that it was a set up to try & stop trump from getting the whitehouse & hillary is somehow behind it all.

Wow, does it matter who is behind it?

Look at your fecking signature. If you know the truth, why feed into lies?

i'm not feeding into anything.

i'll believe our intel over president grift weasel, any day of the week.

tick tock.