FBI agents seized smashed computer hard drives from the home of Florida Democratic Rep. Debbie Wass

[Freewill]

Why are Democrat Leaders Covering Up the Crimes of these Staff Members?


Her former IT team has long been under suspicion for a series of very serious crimes. However, Schultz ran interference for her IT team for months and even fought to keep investigators from gathering evidence of their crimes.

“Imran Awan Debbie's cohort in crime is suspected of much more, including the possible theft of sensitive information from the office computers of numerous Democratic Party lawmakers and sending that data to a secret server. It is a major scandal almost completely ignored by the establishment media.”

As Trump has pointed out, loyalty is a virtue, it would only be nice if DWS was loyal to America, as with most liberals.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

1. BASED ON WHAT??? How is that established by something about Schultz's hard drives and IT guys? Are the two somehow mutually exclusive? What the **** is the short circuit in your head that makes you say lunatic nonsense like that?

2. NO IT DID NOT, there is ZERO indication special prosecutor has any interest in Schultz. You are making bullshit up.

3. What freaking leaks?

4. you are totally insane, what do you base your assertions on? Seems like you reach into your asshole and just pull out whatever your fantasies cook up.

Ummmm, unlike your halfbaked claims about trump, this person was actually......um....you know.....ARRESTED! Wake the hell up you twit!

WHAT WAS HE ARRESTED FOR?

Any of you have ANY idea?

No, because the indictment hasn't been made public yet. But my point still stands. You have been blathering on for weeks and to date nothing. The one person arrested is a DNC operative. Doesn't look good for you.

He was arrested for falsifying information on a loan application. Nothing remotely close to the BS being tossed around.

This thread should be moved to the conspiracy section.

It's obvious you're clueless as to the events leading up to his arrest

Explain it to us professor and please provide links.

 

[depotoo]

Then why even have primaries? Are you not familiar what went on at the the nominating convention when Obama and Clinton were facing off? If not, you just might want to thoroughly research it.

Do you not see they did to Sanders what they did to Hillary in 2008? Surely, you aren't that blind.

I didn't follow the Sanders race that closely but from the photographs he was winning by a landslide. No way should Hillary have been nominated. Of course, the Democrats know that now. Hindsight is 20/20. The only ones they have to blame is themselves. Sanders actually had crowds comparable to Trump's. It would have been a much closer race.

I didn't follow the Sanders race that closely but from the photographs he was winning by a landslide.

Photographs?

WTH?

Photographs. You know. Those things that Journalists add to their story to bring it to life? Yes. Photographs. Sanders had huge crowds. Hillary's meetings looked like a commercial for the Maytag man. Or lady in this case.

Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.
Photographs and crowd sizes have nothing to do with that.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

 

[Papageorgio]

Do you not see they did to Sanders what they did to Hillary in 2008? Surely, you aren't that blind.

I didn't follow the Sanders race that closely but from the photographs he was winning by a landslide. No way should Hillary have been nominated. Of course, the Democrats know that now. Hindsight is 20/20. The only ones they have to blame is themselves. Sanders actually had crowds comparable to Trump's. It would have been a much closer race.

I didn't follow the Sanders race that closely but from the photographs he was winning by a landslide.

Photographs?

WTH?

Photographs. You know. Those things that Journalists add to their story to bring it to life? Yes. Photographs. Sanders had huge crowds. Hillary's meetings looked like a commercial for the Maytag man. Or lady in this case.

Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.
Photographs and crowd sizes have nothing to do with that.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

So your party chooses the candidate before the primaries. What is the point of the primaries then?

 

[dannyboys]

This is HUGE!!!!!

Huge for the capitol hill police maybe.

Huge for Mueller. He had nothing to investigate until this happened.

Mueller won't have anything to do with a second SC's investigation.
He had his chance to 'get' Trump and he found **** all.
The second SC investigation will focus solely on the DNC's corruption/Lynch/illegal unmasking/Comey/the Clintons.
Rudi has already agreed to lead the second investigation.
I hope Debbie likes prison-*****.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Do you not see they did to Sanders what they did to Hillary in 2008? Surely, you aren't that blind.

Photographs?

WTH?

Photographs. You know. Those things that Journalists add to their story to bring it to life? Yes. Photographs. Sanders had huge crowds. Hillary's meetings looked like a commercial for the Maytag man. Or lady in this case.

Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.
Photographs and crowd sizes have nothing to do with that.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

So your party chooses the candidate before the primaries. What is the point of the primaries then?

They back the candidate most likely to win the primaries. That's how it's always been done by both parties. You don't recall Trump crying about how he felt that he wasn't getting the support from the RNC that he thought he should have? They certainly didn't want Trump as the nominee.

You don't recall Trumps claims that it was "rigged" against him?

Donald Trump vs. RNC: Reince Priebus pushes back - CNNPolitics.com


Trump blasts 'rigged' rules on picking Republican delegates


Should we now investigate the RNC as well?

 

[Papageorgio]

Do you not see they did to Sanders what they did to Hillary in 2008? Surely, you aren't that blind.

Photographs. You know. Those things that Journalists add to their story to bring it to life? Yes. Photographs. Sanders had huge crowds. Hillary's meetings looked like a commercial for the Maytag man. Or lady in this case.

Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.
Photographs and crowd sizes have nothing to do with that.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

So your party chooses the candidate before the primaries. What is the point of the primaries then?

They back the candidate most likely to win the primaries. That's how it's always been done by both parties. You don't recall Trump crying about how he felt that he wasn't getting the support from the RNC that he thought he should have? They certainly didn't want Trump as the nominee.

You don't recall Trumps claims that it was "rigged" against him?

Donald Trump vs. RNC: Reince Priebus pushes back - CNNPolitics.com


Trump blasts 'rigged' rules on picking Republican delegates


Should we now investigate the RNC as well?

I didn't listen to Trump much during the election, nor did I listen much to Clinton, didn't care, I wasn't voting for them.

So who was the Republican candidate that the Republican Party backing? I must have missed that.

So the Democratic Party backs guy that is most likely to win the primaries? How do they know who will win? In one election it seems the Dems had a different leader every week. Howard Dean seemed to be a shoe in, yet he didn't make it.

Sorry not buying your excuses.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Do you not see they did to Sanders what they did to Hillary in 2008? Surely, you aren't that blind.

Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.
Photographs and crowd sizes have nothing to do with that.
RealClearPolitics - 2016 Democratic Popular Vote

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

So your party chooses the candidate before the primaries. What is the point of the primaries then?

They back the candidate most likely to win the primaries. That's how it's always been done by both parties. You don't recall Trump crying about how he felt that he wasn't getting the support from the RNC that he thought he should have? They certainly didn't want Trump as the nominee.

You don't recall Trumps claims that it was "rigged" against him?

Donald Trump vs. RNC: Reince Priebus pushes back - CNNPolitics.com


Trump blasts 'rigged' rules on picking Republican delegates


Should we now investigate the RNC as well?

I didn't listen to Trump much during the election, nor did I listen much to Clinton, didn't care, I wasn't voting for them.

So who was the Republican candidate that the Republican Party backing? I must have missed that.

So the Democratic Party backs guy that is most likely to win the primaries? How do they know who will win? In one election it seems the Dems had a different leader every week. Howard Dean seemed to be a shoe in, yet he didn't make it.

Sorry not buying your excuses.

It's not an excuse. It's not my fault that you're susceptible to suggestion and are unable to think your way through this.

Trump was screaming it was " rigged" for months and you want to investigate the DNC?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

So does it bother you kooks that none of your hundreds of idiot conspiracy theories has ever panned out?

Not a bit. After every failure, you just move on to the next kook conspiracy theory.

Thanks for doing what you normally do....contributing nothing.

Shultz was forced out for reasons everyone agrees to....

That was no conspiracy theory.

It likely cost Hillary the election.

You lost

Suck on it.

 

[Papageorgio]

Do you not see they did to Sanders what they did to Hillary in 2008? Surely, you aren't that blind.

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

So your party chooses the candidate before the primaries. What is the point of the primaries then?

They back the candidate most likely to win the primaries. That's how it's always been done by both parties. You don't recall Trump crying about how he felt that he wasn't getting the support from the RNC that he thought he should have? They certainly didn't want Trump as the nominee.

You don't recall Trumps claims that it was "rigged" against him?

Donald Trump vs. RNC: Reince Priebus pushes back - CNNPolitics.com


Trump blasts 'rigged' rules on picking Republican delegates


Should we now investigate the RNC as well?

I didn't listen to Trump much during the election, nor did I listen much to Clinton, didn't care, I wasn't voting for them.

So who was the Republican candidate that the Republican Party backing? I must have missed that.

So the Democratic Party backs guy that is most likely to win the primaries? How do they know who will win? In one election it seems the Dems had a different leader every week. Howard Dean seemed to be a shoe in, yet he didn't make it.

Sorry not buying your excuses.

It's not an excuse. It's not my fault that you're susceptible to suggestion and are unable to think your way through this.

Trump was screaming it was " rigged" for months and you want to investigate the DNC?

You listen to Trump? Interesting.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

WTF are you talking about?

Why do you find it nefarious for a national party establishment to back it's chosen establishment candidate? That's what they do.

Sanders isn't even a Democrat.
You people are nuts.

So your party chooses the candidate before the primaries. What is the point of the primaries then?

They back the candidate most likely to win the primaries. That's how it's always been done by both parties. You don't recall Trump crying about how he felt that he wasn't getting the support from the RNC that he thought he should have? They certainly didn't want Trump as the nominee.

You don't recall Trumps claims that it was "rigged" against him?

Donald Trump vs. RNC: Reince Priebus pushes back - CNNPolitics.com


Trump blasts 'rigged' rules on picking Republican delegates


Should we now investigate the RNC as well?

I didn't listen to Trump much during the election, nor did I listen much to Clinton, didn't care, I wasn't voting for them.

So who was the Republican candidate that the Republican Party backing? I must have missed that.

So the Democratic Party backs guy that is most likely to win the primaries? How do they know who will win? In one election it seems the Dems had a different leader every week. Howard Dean seemed to be a shoe in, yet he didn't make it.

Sorry not buying your excuses.

It's not an excuse. It's not my fault that you're susceptible to suggestion and are unable to think your way through this.

Trump was screaming it was " rigged" for months and you want to investigate the DNC?

You listen to Trump? Interesting.

You deny it ever happened? Not really interesting. That's what you types always do.
Deny reality in favor of rw media lunacy.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Her logic is totally flawed when she is trying to get the DC Chief of Police to hand over the device with the DNC corruption on it.

If anything that someone owns is evidence in a crime, it doesn't matter if the owner is the one charged with the crime.

If someone uses a knife that I own to kill someone, I don't get the murder weapon back just because I am not a suspect.

What the **** kind do stupid bullshit is that?

 

[mamooth]

So, it's the next day.

The Alex Jones cultists are still babbling, egging each other on to ever-greater heights of stupidity. Cult members get big brownie points for saying the craziest things, so they all compete to do so.

Nobody else is paying any attention to them.

That is, same old same old.

So, cultists, how's the Seth Rich conspiracy theory going? How's it tie into this one? You know you want to tell us, and we could use the laughs.

 

[NYcarbineer]

But on a positive note, I hear Dooley's off the hook...

If you're O L D and NY, you get it. lol

 

[jon_berzerk]

That's what always threw me on the Trump/Russia thing. Why would they support Trump when they have owned the democrats for decades?

Doesn't add up. Doesn't follow logic and 75 years of what we know about Russia, Communism, and the Democrat Party.

I knew there was some major fuckery going on in this country.

the communist party threw in with the democrats this last election

--LOL

check out the leftard rallies some time

it is filled with communist slogans and such

--LOL

i dont know who they think they are kidding

We damn near voted in a candidate that was running on communism but when he lost we got all concerned about Russia and shit. Because socialism is bad you know. Unless it's single payer healthcare, free college and a shitload of other stuff. ******* Russians ruining our chance to be just like them.

except the DNC elite decided they would rather run a criminal then a communist

little did they know at the time they could of had both with bernie

--LOL

You find it odd that the DNC chose a stalwart Democrat rather than an Independent?

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Doesn't add up. Doesn't follow logic and 75 years of what we know about Russia, Communism, and the Democrat Party.

I knew there was some major fuckery going on in this country.

the communist party threw in with the democrats this last election

--LOL

check out the leftard rallies some time

it is filled with communist slogans and such

--LOL

i dont know who they think they are kidding

We damn near voted in a candidate that was running on communism but when he lost we got all concerned about Russia and shit. Because socialism is bad you know. Unless it's single payer healthcare, free college and a shitload of other stuff. ******* Russians ruining our chance to be just like them.

except the DNC elite decided they would rather run a criminal then a communist

little did they know at the time they could of had both with bernie

--LOL

You find it odd that the DNC chose a stalwart Democrat rather than an Independent?

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

The will of the people was expressed clearly when Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.

 

[JGalt]

the communist party threw in with the democrats this last election

--LOL

check out the leftard rallies some time

it is filled with communist slogans and such

--LOL

i dont know who they think they are kidding

We damn near voted in a candidate that was running on communism but when he lost we got all concerned about Russia and shit. Because socialism is bad you know. Unless it's single payer healthcare, free college and a shitload of other stuff. ******* Russians ruining our chance to be just like them.

except the DNC elite decided they would rather run a criminal then a communist

little did they know at the time they could of had both with bernie

--LOL

You find it odd that the DNC chose a stalwart Democrat rather than an Independent?

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

The will of the people was expressed clearly when Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.

...and likewise, when we elected Trump. So there you have it.

 

[jon_berzerk]

the communist party threw in with the democrats this last election

--LOL

check out the leftard rallies some time

it is filled with communist slogans and such

--LOL

i dont know who they think they are kidding

We damn near voted in a candidate that was running on communism but when he lost we got all concerned about Russia and shit. Because socialism is bad you know. Unless it's single payer healthcare, free college and a shitload of other stuff. ******* Russians ruining our chance to be just like them.

except the DNC elite decided they would rather run a criminal then a communist

little did they know at the time they could of had both with bernie

--LOL

You find it odd that the DNC chose a stalwart Democrat rather than an Independent?

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

The will of the people was expressed clearly when Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.

sure pal sure

 

[ColonelAngus]

Debbie is the epitome of the D.C. Swamp.

She is a corrupt witch who should be in prison.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

We damn near voted in a candidate that was running on communism but when he lost we got all concerned about Russia and shit. Because socialism is bad you know. Unless it's single payer healthcare, free college and a shitload of other stuff. ******* Russians ruining our chance to be just like them.

except the DNC elite decided they would rather run a criminal then a communist

little did they know at the time they could of had both with bernie

--LOL

You find it odd that the DNC chose a stalwart Democrat rather than an Independent?

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

i find it odd that the party disregarded the will of the people

The will of the people was expressed clearly when Clinton won the primary by nearly four million votes.

...and likewise, when we elected Trump. So there you have it.

Which has nothing to do with the discussion at hand, of course.