Favorite PC Game

I do single player only, have no desire to deal with anyone else playing a computer game.
But this is all, Battlefield is about.
Then why do they have a single player campaign........ Uuummmm.......
That´s just a bonus.
I don't play well with others....... :D
A matter of experience. When I started in BF2, I suffered many deaths.
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
 
But this is all, Battlefield is about.
Then why do they have a single player campaign........ Uuummmm.......
That´s just a bonus.
I don't play well with others....... :D
A matter of experience. When I started in BF2, I suffered many deaths.
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
For me, Multiplayer is the best modus to play shooter. I recommend you to give it a try.
 
Then why do they have a single player campaign........ Uuummmm.......
That´s just a bonus.
I don't play well with others....... :D
A matter of experience. When I started in BF2, I suffered many deaths.
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
For me, Multiplayer is the best modus to play shooter. I recommend you to give it a try.
Not a team player so pretty sure it wouldn't work for me.
 
That´s just a bonus.
I don't play well with others....... :D
A matter of experience. When I started in BF2, I suffered many deaths.
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
For me, Multiplayer is the best modus to play shooter. I recommend you to give it a try.
Not a team player so pretty sure it wouldn't work for me.
Most of them aren´t team players. Sometimes, it is disturbing to see your team losing just because everybody does only what he wants, while the clan in the other team rolls up the battlefield. That often results in a victory of a team that has almost all tickets left at the end of a match.
 
I don't play well with others....... :D
A matter of experience. When I started in BF2, I suffered many deaths.
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
For me, Multiplayer is the best modus to play shooter. I recommend you to give it a try.
Not a team player so pretty sure it wouldn't work for me.
Most of them aren´t team players. Sometimes, it is disturbing to see your team losing just because everybody does only what he wants, while the clan in the other team rolls up the battlefield. That often results in a victory of a team that has almost all tickets left at the end of a match.
Exactly why I choose not to play multiplayer, I don't want to be responsible for the team losing because I'm off doing what I know is the best tactic and no one else agrees with me because we have to hold a specific objective and they think sitting around the actual objective waiting for an attack to come is is the best defense....... I prefer to be mobile and take the fight to the enemy before they have a chance to develop their attack. I'd probably do good as a sniper in those type of games.
 
A matter of experience. When I started in BF2, I suffered many deaths.
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
For me, Multiplayer is the best modus to play shooter. I recommend you to give it a try.
Not a team player so pretty sure it wouldn't work for me.
Most of them aren´t team players. Sometimes, it is disturbing to see your team losing just because everybody does only what he wants, while the clan in the other team rolls up the battlefield. That often results in a victory of a team that has almost all tickets left at the end of a match.
Exactly why I choose not to play multiplayer, I don't want to be responsible for the team losing because I'm off doing what I know is the best tactic and no one else agrees with me because we have to hold a specific objective and they think sitting around the actual objective waiting for an attack to come is is the best defense....... I prefer to be mobile and take the fight to the enemy before they have a chance to develop their attack. I'd probably do good as a sniper in those type of games.
No need to waste too many thoughts on how to play. It is just a funny hunt for kills for everyone.
 
It's not that, I do my own thing my own way even within the campaign environment as much as possible. I also don't use and don't know how to use any communication commands and even if I did I wouldn't be communicating with anyone.
For me, Multiplayer is the best modus to play shooter. I recommend you to give it a try.
Not a team player so pretty sure it wouldn't work for me.
Most of them aren´t team players. Sometimes, it is disturbing to see your team losing just because everybody does only what he wants, while the clan in the other team rolls up the battlefield. That often results in a victory of a team that has almost all tickets left at the end of a match.
Exactly why I choose not to play multiplayer, I don't want to be responsible for the team losing because I'm off doing what I know is the best tactic and no one else agrees with me because we have to hold a specific objective and they think sitting around the actual objective waiting for an attack to come is is the best defense....... I prefer to be mobile and take the fight to the enemy before they have a chance to develop their attack. I'd probably do good as a sniper in those type of games.
No need to waste too many thoughts on how to play. It is just a funny hunt for kills for everyone.
Who knows, I might change my mind someday but right now I wouldn't hold my breath if I was you.
 
After getting used to Multiplayer, all the rest will appear to be boring. I do not play shooters offline a lot.
 
I went to Black Ops1 Multiplayer (Death Match), that was kinda cool but I have no idea if the other players on the team were real or computer generated.
 
Last edited:
I only know about bots in online Multiplayer games that do not really exist. In BF2, some servers maintain bots to not to get into the out-of match mode. The mode is activated when the minimum number of players isn´t reached.
 
Smite is a great game. You get to pick 1 of over 60 mythical gods from around the world in different multiplayer settings or challenge 1 v 1. You can learn the game by playing against bots.

If your a bit of a role playing geek, ddo Dungeons and Dragons Online, is just endless fun. hard to solo anything, but once you know your way around that gets easier. I have the most fun in groups that play together.

Smite and ddo are both f2p
 
Smite is a great game. You get to pick 1 of over 60 mythical gods from around the world in different multiplayer settings or challenge 1 v 1. You can learn the game by playing against bots.

If your a bit of a role playing geek, ddo Dungeons and Dragons Online, is just endless fun. hard to solo anything, but once you know your way around that gets easier. I have the most fun in groups that play together.

Smite and ddo are both f2p
I don´t like f2p. The whole concept destroys the games.
 
I only play single player games, because I know I would not survive long playing against a loads of wiz kids.
I am having enough trouble surviving against one of the bosses in ' deus ex'. It is a computer character playing a computer animated character (if you get what I mean). But she is not human in the game, therefore very hard to kill. I have unloaded 100 rounds from a chain gun into her with no effect.
 
I went ahead and tried MoH Modern Warfare 3 multiplayer, deathmatch with online players, got my ass kicked constantly but did manage to get 7 kills. Played again today and did much better, 12 kills and I didn't die as much.
 
Last edited:
Dammit ! there is no God mode cheat for 'Deus ex' and I cannot beat one of the bosses. I just keep dying.
 
Dammit ! there is no God mode cheat for 'Deus ex' and I cannot beat one of the bosses. I just keep dying.
dood, it's just a game, but this little girl thinks
youlooser.jpg
 
Microsoft Flight Simulator 10, 11 is due out next year.
IL2 1946, WW2 combat flight sim.
War In The Pacific - strategy game with incredible depth.

Far Cry3, Far Cry 4, Tomb Raider 2013. The state of the art for graphics and huge free roam world. Far Cry 3 and 4 have to be seen to be believed.

I played a lot of Call of Duty multiplayer, the first couple games. Also very well done.
 
Dammit ! there is no God mode cheat for 'Deus ex' and I cannot beat one of the bosses. I just keep dying.
dood, it's just a game, but this little girl thinks
youlooser.jpg

Oh yea ! Nuts to you and your offspring, I am not such a loser because I finally fragged the bitching boss. Now I can move on in the game. I did not want to abandon it, because I have invested two weeks of playing time into it.
 
I am currently playing Far Cry 3. After I fell in love with the pointless Far Cry 2 I feared all the features of FC3 would have destroyed the game. But this is not the case. There is now a crafting system, other role play elements and much more. And the game is expected to last far more time than CoD titles do. The graphics ain´t better than in Far Cry 2, though.
 
I disagree about the graphics, they are light years ahead of FC2, as is FC4.

Looking forward to FC5 in about a year. The open world aspect of Far Cry 3 and 4 are so well done it is the standard other games have to come up to. Animals act like animals, water like water. I had passed over the Far Cry series until a few months ago as it looked like a mediocre shooter. I was quite wrong. I recommend this game to anyone.

There is a great story and you have to battle 'enemies' across the map, sometimes they're out driving around on patrol, sometimes they set up road blocks, sometimes on walking patrol. And they have key bases or outposts across the Islands that you have to liberate. You have a myriad of SMG's, LMG's, bow and arrow, sniper rifles, knives, grenades, Molotov cocktails, mines, C4. The way to use all these things is nearly endless. Set mines at key points and bait the enemy to drive or walk over them. Plant C4 and wait for or bait enemies to their doom. Drive around in various vehicles and take out enemies that way or run them off the road. Or you can use all stealth and a knife and never fire a shot. The whole thing is very well done and there is a ton of stuff to do along with the story, in 3 and 4. And watch out for the sharks, tigers, bears, wild dog packs, snakes...

I'm a big COD fan and the mechanics of FC3 and 4 rival and surpass that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom