The collapse of that snakepit FAUX Snooze continues unabated.
Nolte: Newsmax TV Tops Fox News for First Time
The garbage pile that is Fox News just lost for the first time to Newsmax TV. Had you predicted that six weeks ago, you would have been laughed at.www.breitbart.com
The garbage pile that is Fox News just lost for the first time to Newsmax TV. It was only one metric, during one day, during a single hour. What matters, though, is that had you predicted such a victory was possible even six weeks ago, you would have felt the hot breath of laughter in your stupid face.Well, who’s laughing now? LOL!The answer to that question has to be especially humiliating for the garbage pile that is Fox News, because who’s laughing now is Newsmax TV, me, and CNNLOL’s Brian “Tater” Stelter, who is laughing all over the news that:In the key 25- to 54-year-old demographic prized by advertisers, “Greg Kelly Reports” on Newsmax out-rated “The Story with Martha MacCallum” on Fox.The margin was narrow — Kelly averaged 229,000 viewers in the demo and MacCallum averaged 203,000 — but it is still a milestone in the cable news industry.I’m not going to link the CNNLOL piece. As you know, I’m dedicated to stopping the spread of fake news and misinformation, and Tater tells so many lies in this piece, it would be irresponsible to send anyone over there, but still: LOL! Fox News! LOL!And let’s not forget that unlike Fox News, Newsmax TV can be streamed live from a number of platforms, like Pluto TV (which is free and awesome), and these ratings numbers do not include streaming viewers.In between all his lies, Tater points out something that should worry Fox News above all else: Newsmax TV is a comer… Prior to Election Night, when the garbage pile that is Fox News meddled in the election with fake calls, some of which had to be retracted, in order to defeat President Trump, Greg Kelly’s Newsmax TV show drew only about 10,000 25-54 demo viewers and 100,000 total viewers.On Monday, he drew nearly a million viewers.Things are booming over there.
Do you buy or sell advertising on television?
No?
Well then what anybody's ratings are is IRRELEVANT. Dafuck do you think ratings are FOR? GREAT BIG HINT: it has ZERO to do with "veracity". If that were the case, fake wrestling, onstage paternity suits and naked people traipsing around on an island forced to eat bugs............ WOULD NOT EXIST.
Dumbass.
The bottom line is this: If Fox Noise's (or anybody's) ratings go down here's what it means:
It means the next advertiser doing business with them will get a better price than they got last quarter.
THAT'S IT.
Sure, but the only way Trump or his drones know to judge veracity is with tv ratings. That's not really how it works, but they are too stupid to know that. If crowds were the same as credibility, Elton John or Paul McCartney would be president.
I'm thinking maybe the word "ratings" sails over their pointed little heads. They must think there's some guy behind a curtain pulling levers "rating" networks on quality or some wackadoo shit.
I do know one thing about ratings. Get woke go broke.
What in the wide world of blue fuck is that supposed to mean?
Are ya stupid!!!
Never mind we already know the answer.