Father wishes to marry his adopted son

[novasteve]

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

It's not as bad as it sounds, a gay couple, one adopted the other, Now they want to marry. But they want a major exception to how adoption is treated.

 

[bucs90]

Well....governments cannot define marriage....

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

It's not as bad as it sounds, a gay couple, one adopted the other, Now they want to marry. But they want a major exception to how adoption is treated.

ROFLMNAO!

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child... and having formed a 'loving... caring relationship with the child'... the two; the would-be Son and Father... now want to be Married?

What's it been kids? 6 MONTHS? Since the US Federal Gov't Licensed Degeneracy?

 

[ogibillm]

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

It's not as bad as it sounds, a gay couple, one adopted the other, Now they want to marry. But they want a major exception to how adoption is treated.

ROFLMNAO!

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child... and having formed a 'loving... caring relationship with the child... the two; the would-be Son and Father... now want to be Married?

What's it been kids? 6 MONTHS?

You're an idiot.
The adoption happened so their relationship have some legal rights.
It would not have happened if they had just been allowed to marry

 

[WorldWatcher]

ROFLMNAO!

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child... and having formed a 'loving... caring relationship with the child... the two; the would-be Son and Father... now want to be Married?

What's it been kids? 6 MONTHS? Since the US Federal Gov't Licensed Degeneracy?

Well you just proved you didn't even bother to read the link in the OP to be able to intelligently discuss the issue.

The couple are in their 70's and had been together for 40 years when they used adoption to at least try to have some legal protections under the law.


No children involved.


>>>>

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

ROFLMNAO!

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child... and having formed a 'loving... caring relationship with the child... the two; the would-be Son and Father... now want to be Married?

What's it been kids? 6 MONTHS? Since the US Federal Gov't Licensed Degeneracy?

Well you just proved you didn't even bother to read the link in the OP to be able to intelligently discuss the issue.

The couple are in their 70's and had been together for 40 years when they used adoption to at least try to have some legal protections under the law.


No children involved.


>>>>

WOW!!~

I was wrong... When I posted that, I didn't think it was possible for this to get any CREEPIER!

 

[the_human_being]

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

It's not as bad as it sounds, a gay couple, one adopted the other, Now they want to marry. But they want a major exception to how adoption is treated.

Perfectly legal and aboveboard as defined by SCOTUS. In fact, were it his biological son it would be permissible.

 

[skye]

A drop of incest here ... a drop of homosexuality there.... and VOILA! it's all a political correctness progressive heaven !

 

[Arianrhod]

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child...

No.

 

[bucs90]

State cannot define marriage. Period. Extra period. Giant black burned and seared into paper period.

States cannot...CANNOT...define marriage.

Anyone can marry anyone or anything or....well....use imagination.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child...

No.

What it is, is a sexual deviant that adopted a child, who now wants to marry his son.

You'd like to define it otherwise, because nothing makes a cult less acceptable than degeneracy... but the deviant is screwing his own son and the two of them want to be married.

And in terms of creepiness... you idiots have driven clean off the scale, AGAIN!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

State cannot define marriage. Period. Extra period. Giant black burned and seared into paper period.

States cannot...CANNOT...define marriage.

Anyone can marry anyone or anything or....well....use imagination.

That is how the Federal Licensing of Degeneracy reads... no question.

 

[ogibillm]

State cannot define marriage. Period. Extra period. Giant black burned and seared into paper period.

States cannot...CANNOT...define marriage.

Anyone can marry anyone or anything or....well....use imagination.

No. That is idiotic

 

[ogibillm]

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child...

No.

What it is, is a sexual deviant that adopted a child, who now wants to marry his son.

You'd like to define it otherwise, because nothing makes a cult less acceptable than degeneracy... but the deviant is screwing his own son and the two of them want to be married.

And in terms of creepiness... you idiots have driven clean off the scale, AGAIN!

Again, you can't be bothered with facts.
The couple are 78 and 68. The "son" was adopted at age 65. There were never children involved

 

[Arianrhod]

SO... It's just a sexual deviant, who adopted a child...

No.

What it is, is a sexual deviant that adopted a child, who now wants to marry his son.

No.

Post it a third time. Or just default to your usual script.

Or open your mind enough to let a little bit of light in and ask "Why? That's what it looks like to me. Explain."

 

[bucs90]

State cannot define marriage. Period. Extra period. Giant black burned and seared into paper period.

States cannot...CANNOT...define marriage.

Anyone can marry anyone or anything or....well....use imagination.

No. That is idiotic

No....that is LAW. Thank Obama.

State cannot define marriage. Period. Law. Hard fact. Settled.

Dude wants to marry his own child....he can.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

No.

It is LITERALLY: a sexual deviant that adopted a child, who now wants to marry his son.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

I don't suppose their last name is Allen ?

 

[Geaux4it]

what perverts

-Geaux

 

[Pop23]

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

It's not as bad as it sounds, a gay couple, one adopted the other, Now they want to marry. But they want a major exception to how adoption is treated.

Perfectly legal and aboveboard as defined by SCOTUS. In fact, were it his biological son it would be permissible.

If they were biological, it is indeed possible if they travelled to iowa.

Iowa's marriage law, strange as it sounds, appears to allow immediate family same sex couples to Marry. It's in Iowa Code 595.19.

Iowa Code 595.19

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

Notice no same sex.

This attorney blogs about it as a way to avoid inheritance tax:

Pass Wealth Tax Free by Marrying a Descendant? ~ CPA at Law
The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

The rush for marriage equality created a legal paradox, and since iowa has no residency requirements, and since all 50 states must recognize these marriages, well, you are correct.