Father of Raped Daughter not Allowed to Speak at Loudoun County School Board

There is no conflict between the two. We, as a society, could easily have maintained the old way of doing things, ie USE THE RIGHT FUCKING BATHROOM, and then if he raped a girl, no matter where or when, we lock him up.


You are envisioning a conflict where there is none.
Life is mixed in nature. Why not us? The body hating church made people to not be content with the body they were born with fighting clothing optional tooth and nail. The church caused what is,
 
Your words do not actually match what the article says.

"On the day of the incident, Smith says the school told him to come to the campus because his daughter had been physically assaulted. They did not say she had been sexually assaulted.

Once he got there, he says school staff told him they would handle it internally, choosing not to call the police for an as-yet unexplained reason.

He was enraged by the decision and challenged them on it. The school board then did call the police but to report Smith, not the boy, for making a scene.

'I went nuts. I called the principal a p****. Six cop cars showed up like a f****** SWAT team,' he said.

The school's principal sent out an alert that day warning parents of what had happened involving Smith, but it said nothing of the sexual assault allegations in the bathroom.

It's unclear exactly what happened next but Smith ended up at the hospital with his daughter.

There, they told doctors what happened and a rape kit was performed.

'Thank God that I drew enough attention to it, without getting arrested, that we got an escort to the hospital and they administered a rape kit that night,' he said.

The rape kit verified his daughter's claim so they took it to the police and a case was opened.

The teenager was arrested two months later - after the school board meeting - after an investigation by the sheriff's office."


So, the school did NOT report it to the police.



The problem is that our schools are more concerned with being "woke" then protecting our children.


To the point of letting the be raped by crazy rapists, and then covering it up, and arresting parents that dare have the nerve to be pissed off that their little girl was raped.

would locking him up be a better deterrent than trying to keep him out of the ladies room?
Locking him up AFTER letting him into the girls’ room, where he raped someone, is too late. He already committed the horrible crime.
 
Ok so girl gets raped by a dude in a dress in the bathroom the school let him go in, dad finds out, school says they want to not call the cops and instead "handle it themselves", dad flips out and he is arrested?

The school won't call the cops on a tranny serial rapist? But they will call the cops on some poor dad upset his daughter got raped?

The principal and everyone should be the ones getting arrested for not reporting a rape of a minor to the authorities.
Both incidents were reported immediately to the police...


The school board can't do much as there is an on going investigation by the Sheriff's Office...

Because these are under age the names are kept private, even the school board don't know...

These are very tricky cases and if the school act the immediately interfere with due process...

Was Ziegler honest in June? who knows... The details a very loose to say the least... Looks like there something dodgey but hard to say at this point..
 
BlindBoo They not only covered it up, they sent the Skirt Boy Rapist TO ANOTHER SCHOOL where he promptly raped another girl in the bathroom. The school officials involved should be fired and charged with aiding and abetting a criminal.
 
I like your signature line about Democrats who became Republicans. I myself was once a Democrat, but now that they’ve gone full-blown Marxist, I will never vote for another Dem

Locking him up AFTER letting him into the girls’ room, where he raped someone, is too late. He already committed the horrible crime.
should i lock him up before he does something wrong?

and now we are back to a NO TRANSGENDERS ALLOWED stopping this crime OF WHICH i've already said i don't believe it will.
 
The gender identification bullshit has caught on for predatory males to manipulate and it’s open season in libbie land
 
Locking him up AFTER letting him into the girls’ room, where he raped someone, is too late. He already committed the horrible crime.
You think the rapist wouldn't have gone in there because there was a sign? Seriously, do ye know anything about sexual assault cases...
 
BlindBoo They not only covered it up, they sent the Skirt Boy Rapist TO ANOTHER SCHOOL where he promptly raped another girl in the bathroom. The school officials involved should be fired and charged with aiding and abetting a criminal.
Some father is going to have to sacrifice himself for the common good and blow some heads off school officials and they will begin to correctly sense they can’t cover this up and look the other way anymore
 
should i lock him up before he does something wrong?

and now we are back to a NO TRANSGENDERS ALLOWED stopping this crime OF WHICH i've already said i don't believe it will.
Your logic is completely crazy. You suggested that locking up the scumbag would have deterred him from raping the girl. So you’re right…..you can’t lock him up BEFORE he rapes. So that begs the question: how does locking him up deter him? He already committed the crime!
 
The gender identification bullshit has caught on for predatory males to manipulate and it’s open season in libbie land
It’s what those of us who were opposed to the transgender policy predicted would happen. Now that it did, leftists tried to cover it up. Seems that the “woke” contingent are so determined to protect transgenders’ feelings (by allowing them into the girls‘ room) that they are willing to take the risk that a boy will put on a dress and rape a girl there.

This is what happens when people (leftists) divide people into specific groups, rank them according to “oppression,” and then bend over backwards to excuse, hide, or downplay when one of the oppressed group does wrong (or, in this case, when a policy designed to favor a protected group over others does harm).
 
Your logic is completely crazy. You suggested that locking up the scumbag would have deterred him from raping the girl. So you’re right…..you can’t lock him up BEFORE he rapes. So that begs the question: how does locking him up deter him? He already committed the crime!
how does a "do not enter" sign keep him from doing it?
 
Locking him up AFTER letting him into the girls’ room, where he raped someone, is too late. He already committed the horrible crime.
So you think someone who has yet to commit a crime should be locked up?

Minority Report stuff?
 
Some father is going to have to sacrifice himself for the common good and blow some heads off school officials and they will begin to correctly sense they can’t cover this up and look the other way anymore
You are a danger to society. You just told some nutjob to commit mass murder
 
great. we can deal with the policies 2nd. but first, prosecute to the fullest extend and penalty of law and *that* policy will slow things down.

what you are advocating i don't disagree with, but simply feel if you attack closer to the source of the problem, these things stop by nature.

their illegal action of rape should be enough to warrant tossing him in jail. all the sideshow noise diminishes going after the dude who did it.


Teh people in the school administration has demonstrated that their goal in such a situation is to protect the criminal and arrest people that make a fuss about the crimes.


Ignoring that, is actually "encouraging more crimes".
 
how does a "do not enter" sign keep him from doing it?
The ODDS of him doing it go down If the rule is no boys in the girls’ room. We should adjust policies to reduce the odds of girls being raped in school, in the bathroom. rather than allow a policy that enables a rape because liberals care more about those in an “oppressed” group than regular, ordinary girls.
 
It’s what those of us who were opposed to the transgender policy predicted would happen. Now that it did, leftists tried to cover it up. Seems that the “woke” contingent are so determined to protect transgenders’ feelings (by allowing them into the girls‘ room) that they are willing to take the risk that a boy will put on a dress and rape a girl there.

This is what happens when people (leftists) divide people into specific groups, rank them according to “oppression,” and then bend over backwards to excuse, hide, or downplay when one of the oppressed group does wrong (or, in this case, when a policy designed to favor a protected group over others does harm).
Your WHOLE argument is based on the claim that transgendered people are somehow more inclined to rape than non trans people.

Do you have any stats on that? Or is this just pure emotion mixed with politics...
 
Teh people in the school administration has demonstrated that their goal in such a situation is to protect the criminal and arrest people that make a fuss about the crimes.


Ignoring that, is actually "encouraging more crimes"
great. now show me where i said to ignore what they did?

not sure where this is going because basically you are more anti-transgender than anti-rape, as it seems to me. it seems you and others are using this topic to prove you were right about transgenders raping people the ladies room.

not an argument i care to be involved in, so i'll check out now.
 
Teh people in the school administration has demonstrated that their goal in such a situation is to protect the criminal and arrest people that make a fuss about the crimes.
Horse shit. The rapist was arrested...for rape.

The father was arrested because of his actions at that meeting.
 

Forum List

Back
Top