HIs rhetoric is not racist or hateful.
And he will get the majority of the white vote.
Why aren't organizations worried about pissing them off?
His rhetoric is most definitely hateful and racist.
It is NOT common sense to restrict Muslim immigration. In fact it's harkens back to WWII when western counties refused to accept Jews who desperately tried to escape Germany. When asked how many Jews that Canada would take, the then Immigration Minister said "None is too many". Canadians are determined to do things differently this time.
Americans are in more danger from white guys with guns that they are from Muslims, but say the word "terrorist" and they freak. School shootings are the price you pay for the 2nd Amendment, but if one Muslim kills somebody, all Muslim immigration must stop. This isn't even logical, not to mention, it violates the Constitution.
He will NOT get the majority of the white vote. I have a lot of American friends, almost all of whom are white, and NONE of them will vote for Trump. Not one.
Organizations aren't worried about Trumps supporters because they don't want to offend the 60% who aren't voting for him.
1. His rhetoric is not hateful or racist.
2. Mexico is not 1939 Nazi Germany. Try to be less dishonest.
3. Your lack of Trump supporting friends just shows how you have limited your social circle to exclude anyone who is different than you. Trump is polling ahead in the white vote.
4. Organizations aren't worried about offending the half of the country that WILL vote for Trump, because if their officials are lefties, they put their personal political feelings ahead of their professional responsibilities.
#2 was about Syrian Muslims, not Mexicans. Try to keep up.
I don't pick my friends according to their political beliefs. I pick them because they are good people, who treat others with respect. Most are liberal, but some are devoted Republicans, and none of them are voting for Drumpf either.
Remember that few polling companies call cell phones, which skews their results. Older voters have land lines. Younger voters don't have a land line.
Last election, you believed polls which said Mittens was going to win. How'd that work out for you?
2. Fine. Most muslim nations are not Nazi Germany 1939. And Muslims are not Jews. And banning Muslims is just common sense.
3. But you judge who is a good person based on your political beliefs, that you cannot imagine anyone would disagree with without being stupid or evil.
4. No, I didn't. I
hoped that Romney would win. I am well aware that the left's near complete dominance of the media and pop culture allow them to be very effective with propaganda combined with their long term strategy of importing Third World Voters has given them the electoral advantage and it is growing.
4b And nearly ever time I recall a poll being WRONG, it was underestimating the Republican.
More whining, ridiculous excuses, and lies from the reprehensible right.
The ‘left’ has no ‘dominance’ of the media and pop culture, ‘near complete’ or otherwise.
And no one is ‘importing Third World Voters,’ the notion is delusional, ignorant nonsense.
American citizens – naturalized or natural born of immigrant parents – are voting for democratic candidates because, unlike the GOP, the democratic party is not pursuing an agenda hostile to immigrants, Hispanic immigrants in particular.
Hispanic Americans aren’t stupid – they correctly understand exactly what motivates the right’s animosity toward Hispanic immigrants: the unwarranted fear, hate, and bigotry directed at Hispanic immigrants common to far too many conservatives, the fear, hate, and bigotry exhibited by the likes of Trump.
