I’d be pleased to try to educate you, but be honest first.
You will quibble. Groan. Bitch. Moan. Cry. Lie. And so forth, in response. Your sole form of discussion.
To charge “RICO” in Georgia the persecutor must cite two “predicate acts” and is allowed to charge as few as just one person in the alleged “scheme.”
For a dope like you to have any hope of ever grasping the Ga. RICO law, in the context of that silly case, you need to understand what Fani has claimed in that indictment. So, do some homework.
When you’re completed that assignment you may then try to understand how and why (for example) Fani chose to call it a part of the alleged “enterprise” that witnesses who testified before legislators in Ga and other states but didn’t charge them Trump with that crime perjury.
Obviously, her “theory” is that others lied “for” Trump, not that
he committed the crime (see count 3). So why charge him with count 1? Duh. She is casting a wide net.
But does this mean that the alleged members of the “enterprise” shared the same goal in all of the many supposed “acts?” Come on.
Get off it.
If this trial doesn’t get scuttled by the SCOTUS (or if it doesn’t take place prior to the election in which case it will probably end up getting dumped by the White House no matter who wins), it is a tragically ridiculous theory.
See:
Flashy, but probably not a good choice
www.sidebarsblog.com