Curried Goats
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 31,242
- 11,295
- 1,283
We have hindsight you emotionally frail fucktard. You lost. What am I missing.Her judgement and corrupt decisions were on trial.


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have hindsight you emotionally frail fucktard. You lost. What am I missing.Her judgement and corrupt decisions were on trial.
Of course, Trump's criminal conspiracy to steal an election is a much worse crime. So that should be the focus.The problem isn't her libido... It's her judgement and corruption.
Her and Wade could have had a romantic/sexual relationship without issue.
The terrible judgement was hiring the man she was in a relationship with...the corruption was her financially benefitting from that decision.
The crime was lying under oath to cover up the corruption.
Funny how she thinks no one should be above the law but then also thinks it's OK for her to be above the law.Comment: After Fani voiced her contempt for the Georgia Legislature by refusing to testify...a Georgia Appeals Court agreed to review the case for her removal.
Anyone who believed her testimony in her first removal hearing is gullible as a newborn. Not only should she be removed from the case, she should be removed from office.
![]()
Georgia appeals court agrees to review ruling allowing Fani Willis to stay on Trump election case
Trump and some other defendants in the case had tried to get Willis and her office removed from the case, saying her romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade created a conflict of interestwww.voanews.com
Critical thinking skills.We have hindsight you emotionally frail fucktard. You lost. What am I missing.![]()
![]()
Funny, she is not charged with any crime. What bizarre double standards the cult has.Funny how she thinks no one should be above the law but then also thinks it's OK for her to be above the law.
Try using them. Like connecting the judges ruling to your conclusion, Clown.Critical thinking skills.
Eventually justice will prevail libtards.... get ready for the payback bus bitches....
If a reasonable DA gets appointed, the charges will all be dropped, immediately.Why in God's name would Trump want the idiot removed? Her libido outweighs the rest of her brain.
The ruling?Try using them. Like connecting the judges ruling to your conclusion, Clown.![]()
Maybe that's the ruling as explained to elementary students. Is that how your teacher explained it to you little Timmy?The ruling?
The ruling was "you did nothing wrong but one of you has to go".
That's... not.... what.... critical thinking is....Justify that bullshit.
If they did nothing wrong, why did one of them have to resign?
If they did do something improper... who is more culpable? The guy who was hired, or the woman in charge that used her authority to hire her lover?
Critical thinking.
"While McAfee ruled that Willis did not have an actual conflict of interest that warranted her removal, he said there was an appearance of a conflict that required her to make a choice. Willis could either recuse herself and her office from the case or cut ties with Wade, McAfee said. Within hours, Wade had tendered his resignation."Maybe that's the ruling as explained to elementary students. Is that how your teacher explained it to you little Timmy?
That's... not.... what.... critical thinking is....I mean first you'd have to comprehend what the judge actually ruled and why.
Which isn't at all like that emotional shit you posted above. He didn't find she acted corruptly or unfairly towards Trump and the rest of the defendants. Only that her relationship with the special council created an appearance of a conflict that could be cured by one or both of them stepping down. Once one of them did, critical thinking should have you conclude that now even the appearance is gone. That's how the court sees it."While McAfee ruled that Willis did not have an actual conflict of interest that warranted her removal, he said there was an appearance of a conflict that required her to make a choice. Willis could either recuse herself and her office from the case or cut ties with Wade, McAfee said. Within hours, Wade had tendered his resignation."
![]()
Court of Appeals to review DA Fani Willis removal ruling in Trump Georgia election case
The Georgia Court of Appeals decided to review a judge’s ruling allowing District Attorney Fani Willis to remain at the helm of the Fulton County election interference case against former President Donald Trump. The appeal will likely delay trial dates in the case.www.ajc.com
![]()
if a maga prosecutor is named, they will. Trump lobbied the sec of state.If a reasonable DA gets appointed, the charges will all be dropped, immediately.
That's not accurate. The ruling was that there was not enough evidence to show a serious conflict. That only a possible appearance of impropriety existedThe ruling?
The ruling was "you did nothing wrong but one of you has to go
Yep. With mandatory prison time.Is RICO a crime again?
yeah the appearance was he got hired and she got laid. One had to go.That's not accurate. The ruling was that there was not enough evidence to show a serious conflict. That only a possible appearance of impropriety existed
Comment: After Fani voiced her contempt for the Georgia Legislature by refusing to testify...a Georgia Appeals Court agreed to review the case for her removal.
Anyone who believed her testimony in her first removal hearing is gullible as a newborn. Not only should she be removed from the case, she should be removed from office.
![]()
Georgia appeals court agrees to review ruling allowing Fani Willis to stay on Trump election case
Trump and some other defendants in the case had tried to get Willis and her office removed from the case, saying her romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade created a conflict of interestwww.voanews.com
Fani isn't going anywhere.